• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.1052-1058
• /
• 2002

본 연구의 목적은 만국 주식시장에서 코스닥이 도입된 이후 거래소 시장과 코스닥 시장의 경쟁상황에 대한 동태적 실증 분석을 실시하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 주식시장에 투자하는 투자자의 자금을 획득하기 위해 서로 경쟁하는 두 시장간의 관계를 경쟁상황을 고려한 확산 모형인 Lotka-Volterra 모형을 사용하여 모형화 하고. 일별 자료를 이용하여 각 연도별 확선 곡선을 추정하였다. 또한 추정된 곡선식의 계수들에 대한 분석을 통해서 두 시장간의 경쟁관계의 특성을 규명해 보았다. 분석 결과, 두 시장의 경쟁관계는 코스닥 시장이 도입된 직무에는 코스닥 시장이 정부의 중소벤처기업 지원 활성화와 투자자들의 많은 관심으로 인해 우위를 선점하다가, 이후 두 시장이 공생의 관계로 변모하였고. 최근에는 순수경쟁관계로 변화하고 있다는 사실이 실증적으로 도출되었다. 본 연구는 국내 주식시장이 경험하고 있는코스닥 시장 도입 이후의 시장구조 변화를 경쟁적 확산모형의 관점에서 모형화 하고, 이를 실증적으로 분석하여 경쟁관계의 동태적 변화 상황에 대한 해석을 시도하였다는 점에서 그 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.9 s.148
• /
• pp.24-29
• /
• 2005

올 상반기 코스닥 DC기업들은 매출액이 소폭 증가한 반면 기업 건전도의 잣대가 되는 당기 순이익은 크게 감소했다. 이는 DC분 야가 전체 IT 성장 동력으로 부각되고는 있지만 경기침체의 영향에서 벗어나지 못했기 때문인 것으로 분석된다. 특히 올 상반기 실적을 분석한 결과 DC업종 간 편차가 더욱 커져가고 있는 가운데 동일 업종에서도 업체간 우열이 뚜렷해지는 양상을 보였다.

• The Magazine for Energy Service Companies
• /
• s.18
• /
• pp.48-52
• /
• 2002

지난 5월 15일 ㈜이앤이시스템은 에너지절약전문기업으로서는 최초로 코스닥 등록심사를 통과했다. 지난 92년 ESCO제도가 도입된 지 10년만에 이루어진 이 ESCO의 사례는 에너지절약기기 제조 및 설치 등 에너지산업의 투자촉진 및 성공가능성을 알리는 계기로 작용하고 있다. 매년 $100\%$ 이상의 매출신장으로 업계의 주목을 끌고 있는 이 회사의 성공비결을 분석해본다

• The Optical Journal
• /
• s.148
• /
• pp.41-43
• /
• 2013

광학 전문기업 해성옵틱스가 지난 11월 6일 한국거래소 코스닥시장에 상장됐다. 한국거래소 서울사옥 홍보관에서 열린 이날 기념식은 해성옵틱스 이을성 대표를 포함해 한국거래소 최홍식 부이사장, 코스닥협회 김원식 부회장, 우리투자증권 IB사업부 정영채 대표 등이 참석한 가운데 진행됐다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.1-34
• /
• 2010

Recently, failure rates of Kosdaq IPO firms are increasing and their survival rates tend to be very low, and when these firms do fail, often times backed by a number of governmental financial supports, they may inflict severe financial damage to investors, let alone economy as a whole. To ensure investors' confidence in Kosdaq and foster promising and healthy businesses, it is necessary to precisely assess their intrinsic values and survivability. This study investigates what contributed to the failure of IPO firms and analyzed how these elements are factored into corresponding firms' stock returns. Failure risks are assessed at the time of IPO. This paper considers factors reflecting IPO characteristics, a firm's underwriter prestige, auditor's quality, IPO offer price, firm's age, and IPO proceeds. The study further went on to examine how, if at all, these failure risks involved during IPO led to post-IPO stock prices. Sample firms used in this study include 98 Kosdaq firms that have failed and 569 healthy firms that are classified into the same business categories, and Logit models are used in estimate the probability of failure. Empirical results indicate that auditor's quality, IPO offer price, firm's age, and IPO proceeds shown significant relevance to failure risks at the time of IPO. Of other variables, firm's size and ROA, previously deemed significantly related to failure risks, in fact do not show significant relevance to those risks, whereas financial leverage does. This illustrates the efficacy of a model that appropriately reflects the attributes of IPO firms. Also, even though R&D expenditures were believed to be value relevant by previous studies, this study reveals that R&D is not a significant factor related to failure risks. In examing the relation between failure risks and stock prices, this study finds that failure risks are negatively related to 1 or 2 year size-adjusted abnormal returns after IPO. The results of this study may provide useful knowledge for government regulatory officials in contemplating pertinent policy and for credit analysts in their proper evaluation of a firm's credit standing.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.45-73
• /
• 2007

The empirical results are summarized as follows : First, In relation to effects of ownership structure on firm value, there is the non-linear relationship between major(and foreign) shareholder's holdings and firm value. So the results(the compromise hypothesis) by prior researches(Morck et al. 1988 and so forth) is supported. However Institutional shareholder's holdings do not show the significant results. Second, In relation to effects of outside directors on firm value, equally the results of prior researches(Vafeas 2000, Choi et al. 2004), the higher the ratio of outside directors in the board, the higher firm value. Also there is the non-linear relationship between outside directors ratio and firm value. Furthermore, the higher the possibility of outside directors election in the board, the higher the relationship between ownership structure and firm value. As the economic importance of KOSDAQ is more increase, the researches of KOSDAQ should be more realized.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.677-683
• /
• 2009

This study measures the relative efficiency and productivity change of IT firms received policy fund using DEA model and Malmquist Index for 2006-2007. The main results of this study can by summarized as follows. First, in case of efficiency of CCR for 2006-2007, the number of efficient firms(CCR value is one) are six firms, six firms, respectively. Second, in case of efficiency of BCC for 2006-2007, the number of efficient firms(BCC value is one) are eleven firms, thirteen firms respectively. Third, In case of return to scale for 2006-2007, DRS are fifteen firms and fourteen firms respectively. IRS are two firms and one firm respectively. DRS firms can improve efficiency by the reduction of scale and IRS Firms can improve efficiency by the increase of scale. Fourth, Mean value of Malmquist Index representing productivity change for 2006-2007 are bigger than 1.00. This imply that productivity increase was achieved.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.239-270
• /
• 2017

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and the intensity of R&D expenditures of a firm by analyzing the panel data composed of 553 manufacturing firms in KSE(Korea Stock Exchange) and KOSDAQ listed firms for the period of 2007-2014. The major findings are as follows; (1) Regarding the relationship between CEO stockholding and R&D intensity, we find the inverted-U shape relationship in KOSDAQ firms, consistent with the theoretical discussion and empirical studies on U.S. firms. The result suggests that management stockholding reduces agency problem at the R&D margin. On the contrary, the insignificant result in KSE firms seems to be due to the scant stockholding of most 'non-owner' CEOs. (2) Regarding the relationship between the largest shareholder's portion and R&D intensity, KSE firms exhibit negatively significant relationship, suggesting the existence of serious agency problem between the largest shareholder and the minor shareholders. This agency problem seems to be alleviated in KOSDAQ firms mainly because the founders with technology expertise are still in charge of the business. (3) Foreign investors seem to fail in effectively encouraging R&D expenditures in either KSE or KOSDAQ listed firms. This study contributes to the existing literature by showing for the first time that ownership structure affects R&D activities in different ways between KSE and KOSDAQ firms.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.323-347
• /
• 2006

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is, as to verify the effect of IR announcements, the IR activity to look at the usefulness. In previous study, they found that the IR announcement leads to reductions in information asymmetry, effect to positive stock price. This study examine the abnormal returns between group by corporate characteristics. The data used in this study are daily stock market returns taken from the KOSDAQ listed company with IR announcements during the 2005-2012 year(8 year). We find that follows. First, the capital market is accepted IR activity as the positive information. Second, abnormal returns of small company is higher than big size that. We show the difference of abnormal returns between the venture company and general company, the venture company's high. The abnormal returns of corporate with high ownership is above the group of low ownership. Additionally, consider interaction by firm characteristics, we show the interaction between firm size and business type. The result of two-way ANOVA is that venture corporate with big size are more abnormal returns than others. Also, we demonstrate that firm location is the factor of difference on information effect in venture firm.