• Title/Summary/Keyword: 코나투스

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Research About 10Port Coil Lift Controller Using Bluetooth (블루투스를 이용한 10포트 코일리프트 콘트롤러에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Jeong-Ho;Bae, Joung-Il
    • Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
    • /
    • 2008.07a
    • /
    • pp.1724-1726
    • /
    • 2008
  • 본 연구는 릴레이의 코일 접점 신호의 검출을 송신기에서 코일의 데이터를 검출하고 4-20mA데이터를 1/5,000까지의 분해능으로 환산하되 블루투스를 이용한 무선통신으로 전송할 수 있도록 하여 송신기의 각 코일에서 검출된 데이터 값을 인디케이터에 전송하고 다시 릴레이 코일 신호로 만들어 표시하고 제어하도록 한 것이다. 데이터의 전송은 1Port 에서 10 Port까지 릴레이 코일 및 4-20mA 물리량을 이용하여 검출대상의 접점 리액턴스를 각각 측정하여 블루투스를 이용한 무선통신 데이터 값을 송신하는 코일의 접점 송신수단과 상기 릴레이 접점 송신수단으로부터 전송된 데이터 값을 블루투스를 이용하여 무선통신으로 수신한 후, 상기 릴레이 접점에서 전송된 각각의 데이터 값과 전체 물리량으로 연산 처리된 데이터 값을 디스플레이 하고, 데이터의 디스플레이된 값을 통해 리액턴스 출력, 경보음출력, RS232, 4-20mA 출력이 발생되게 하는 인디케이터로 구성하는 블루투스를 이용한 10 Port 코일 리프트 제어 콘트롤러이다.

  • PDF

A Study on the 'Activity' in Spinoza and Toegye (스피노자와 퇴계의 '능동성'-논고)

  • Sung, Hoe-kyung
    • Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
    • /
    • v.137
    • /
    • pp.225-247
    • /
    • 2016
  • This research examines the philosophy of Toegye and Spinoza in the postneo-Confucian and post-modern perspective in emphasizing the activity of Ri(理) and reason beyond the similarities of system in their thought. There is no disagreement in viewing Toegye and Spinoza as balanced opposites in their attempts to harmonize man and nature. In this discussion, I will infer the similarities of Toegye and Spinoza in terms of an 'activity-passivity' thesis.

An inquiry concerning early philosophy of G. Deleuze (초기 들뢰즈 철학에 관한 연구)

  • Jin, Gi-haeng
    • Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
    • /
    • v.123
    • /
    • pp.409-440
    • /
    • 2012
  • It is well known that Deleuze began his philosophical work from researching the biographies of many predecessors' such as D. Hume, Lucretius, I. Kant, B. Spinoza, F. W. Nietzsche, H. Bergson, and etc. Among them, especially Spinoza, Nietzsche, and Bergson constitute a foundation supporting the whole idea of Deleuze. He declared that the goal of his early biographical work is a theme converging the identity of two philosophers, Spinoza and Nietzsche, and it shows that these two philosophers had such a huge significance to Deleuze, at least by then. However, we may point out two issues here. The first is why Deleuze, who is recognized as a philosopher of 'difference', deals the identity. The other issue is, what kind of identity exists between the two philosophers, Spinoza and Nietzche. In a common sense, their ideas contradict to each other. Spinoza puts God at the center of his philosophical system, whereas Nietzsche declared 'God is dead'. Though Nietzsche expressed a concurrent opinion with Spinoza at first, it is well known that he turned his side against him soon after and criticized him sharply. There is a conflict at the core of this criticism concerning the existence or non-existence of God. Many think that Spinoza, however, cannot be free from the argument that his philosophy allows a possibility of atheism. Deleuze, who also called Spinoza an atheist, suggested a new viewpoint of the philosophy of Spinoza based on his attribution to the concept of 'power'. On the other hand, Deleuze reinterpreted Nietzsche, where he analyzed 'the will to power' in a totally inventive way. Likewise, the reciprocal communication of ideas connected by the concept of 'power' gives a foundation of identifying the two philosophers to Deleuze. In this paper, considering this reciprocal communication, I intent to reveal the foundation of identity of the two philosophers, Spinoza and Nietzsche, and as a result, investigate what the concept of identity means to Deleuze, the philosopher of difference. Furthermore, we will also take a look at how Deleuze presents a new perspective on the conflict on the existence of God of the two philosophers in the process of validating the identity.