• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.38 no.3 s.248
• /
• pp.197-203
• /
• 2005

Homograft aortic valve replacement (AVR) has many advantages such as excellent hemodynamic performance, faster left ventricular hypertrophy regression, resistance to infection and excellent freedom of thromboembolism. To find out the results of homograft AVR, we reviewed our surgical experiences. Material and Method: Eighteen patients (male female=16 : 2, mean age=39.3$\pm$16.2 years, range: 14$\~$68 years) who underwent homo-graft aortic valve replacement between May 1995 and May 2004 were reviewed. The number of homografts was 20 (17 aortic and 3 pulmonic homografts) including two re-operations. Ten patients had a history of previous aortic valve surgery. Indications for the use of a homograft were native valve endocarditis (n=7), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n=5), or Behcet's disease (n=8). The homograft had been implanted predominantly as a full root except in one patient in the subcoronary position. Result: Mean follow-up was 41.3 $\pm$ 26.2 months. There was one operative mortality. Postoperative complications included postoperative bleeding in 3 patients, and wound infection in 1. There was no late death. Three patients underwent redo-AVR. The etiology of the three reoperated patients was Behcet's disease (p=0.025). Freedom from reoperation was $87.5\pm8.3\%$, $78.8\pm11.2\%$ at 1, 5 years respectively, In patients with infective endocarditis, there was no recurrence of endocarditis. There was no thromboembolic complication. Conclusion: Although longer term follow-up with larger numbers of patients is necessary, the operative and mid-term results for homograft AVR was good when we took into account the operative risks of Behcet's disease or infective endocarditis. Behest's disease was a risk factor for reoperation after the homograft AVR. We think homograft AVR is the procedure of choice, particularly in patients with infective endocarditis.

• Proceedings of the KTCVS Conference
• /
• 1998.10a
• /
• pp.155-155
• /
• 1998

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.38 no.7 s.252
• /
• pp.507-509
• /
• 2005

Open heart surgery via right thoracotomy can be accomplished in atrial septal defects, and mitral valve diseases. Recently, thoracoscopic atrial septal defect closure, mitral valve repair, Maze operation, and minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) are accomplished with AESOP 3000. However, there is no report of thoracoscopic aortic valve replacement in Korea. We report a successful thoracospic aortic valve replacement assisted with AESOP 3000 in a 31-year-old female patient.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.25 no.9
• /
• pp.921-924
• /
• 1992

기계판막의 가장 빈번하고 치명적인 결함이 판막혈전이다. 판막혈정의 적절한 조기 치료를 위해서는 조기진단이 선행되어야만 한다. Cineradiography는 조기에 손쉽고, 빠르게 기계판막의 기능장애를 진단하는 방법으로 사료되며 저자들은 42세된 남자 환자에서 29mm Carbomedics 판막으로 승모판막 치환술을 시행한 1례와 58세된 여자 환자에서 승모판막 및 대동맥판막에 각각 25mm, 19mm Carbomedics 판막으로 치환술 후 각각 18개월, 20개월 후 기계판막 혈전이 발생하여 cineradiography로 손쉽게 진단하여 치료하였으므로 보고하는 바이다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.33 no.11
• /
• pp.863-868
• /
• 2000

배경: Cox-Maze III (CM-III) 술식은 복잡한 심방 절개로 인한 긴 수술시간 때문에 다른 개심 수술과 병행하여 시행하기 어려운 단점이 있다. 대상 및 방법: 저자들은 CM-III 술직을 다음과 같이 변형하여 시행하고 그 임상성적을 분석하였다. \circled1 좌심방이를 절제하는 대신 좌심방이를 외부에서 결찰하고, \circled2 폐정맥 분리 절개선과 좌심방이 사이에 냉동절제술을 시행하며, \circled3 우심방이를 절제하는 대신에 우심방 외측 절개선을 우심방이까지 연장하고, \circled4 후종 우심방 절개 하부에서 우심방 외측을 지나 삼첨판막륜으로 향하는 T-자 절개선을 생략하였다. 저자들이 시행한 변형 술식의 용이성과 효율성을 평가하기 위하여, 우리나라에서도 빈도가 높은 류마치스성 승모판막 질환에서, 전통적인 Cox-III 술식(그룹 I)의 임상결과와, 변형된 CM-III 술식(그룹 II)의 임상결과를 비교하였다. 결과: 그룹 I(n=18)에서 동반된 수술은 승모판막 치환술 10례, 승모판막 성형술3례, 승모판막 치환술과 삼첨판막륜 성형술3례, 승모판막 재치환술 2례 등이었다. 그룹II(n=23)에서 동반된 수술은 승모판막 치환술 7례, 승모판막 성형술 5례, 승모판막 치환술과 삼첨판막륜 성형술 1례, 승모판막 재치환술 10례 등이었다. 그룹 I과 그룹 II에서 평균 대동맥 차단 시간(ACC)은 각각 135$\pm$29분과 104$\pm$18 분, 심패바이패스(CPB) 시간은 각각 240$\pm$33분과 185$\pm$42분이었다. 그룹 I과 그룹 II의 평균 추적 관찰 기간은 각각 47$\pm$14 개월과 29$\pm$4 개월이었다. 그룹 I에서는 16례(88.9%)에서 정상 동율동으로 회복되었고 1례에서 심방세동이 남아 있었으며, 다른 1례는 서맥증후군(sick sinus syndrome)으로 인공 심박조율기를 삽입하였다. 그룹 II에서는 21례(91.3%)에서 정상 동율동으로 회복되었고 2례는 심방세동이 지속되었다. 그룹 I에서 정상동율동으로 회복된 16례는 100%(16/16)에서 우심방의 수축을 심장 초음파검사에서 확인할 수 있었으며, 좌심방의 수축은 75%(12/16)에서 확인할 수 있었다. 그룹 II에서는 정상 동율동으로 회복된 21례 중 100%(21/21)에서 우심방의 수축을 확인할 수 있었으며, 좌심방의 수축은 76.2%(16/21)에서 확인할 수 있었다. 결론: 변형 CM-III 술식은 전통 CM-III 술식에 비하여 ACC time(p<0.005)과 CPB time(p<0.001)을 의미있게 줄이면서도 필적할 만 한 정상 동율동 전환율과 심방 수축력의 회복을 보여주었다.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.34 no.9
• /
• pp.680-685
• /
• 2001

Background: Tricuspid valve replacement is very rarely performed procedure and its long-term result is not yet satisfactory. Moreover, it is not well known whether bioprosthesis or mechanical prosthesis is the best selection for artificial valve. We reviewed 72 cases of tricuspid valve replacements in 71 patients between January 1989 and December 1998, trying to analyze the overall results and risk factors for mortality and morbidity. Material and Method: Average age of the patients at the time of operation was 42$\pm$13 years(range 16 to 65 years) and the sex ratio of male versus female was 32/39. Primary diagnosis consisted of 50 cases of aquired valvular heart disease and 18 cases of congenital heart disease, such as Ebstein’s anomaly. 4 cases had isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation. Implanted valves were 69 mechanical prosthesis and 3 bioprosthesis. Concomitant mitral or aortic valve replacements were performed in 50 cases. One patient received concomittant pulmonary valve replacement. Result: There were 7(9.72%) operative deaths and 7(13.0%) late deaths. Actuarial survival at 10 years was 59.2$\pm$7.2%. Prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis occurred 11 times in 5 patients. Reoperation for prosthetic tricuspid valve failure was performed in 1 patient. In this case, examination of the explanted prostheses showed that the tricuspid stenosis was the result of valve thrombosis. Among the 47 survivors, 46 patients(98%) were in functional class I or II. Conclusion: In our ten-year experience of tricuspid valve replacement, mortality and morbidity were satisfactory. Mechanical prosthesis in tricuspid position showed comparable clinical results as bioprosthesis.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.40 no.3 s.272
• /
• pp.232-235
• /
• 2007

We present 2 cases of patients who underwent surgical repair and replacement of an injured aortic valve that was secondary to nonpenetrating trauma. Primary repair was undertaken on an 18-year old boy, but he had persistent moderate aortic regurgitation for five years after surgery. Another 64-year old man was treated successfully with surgical replacement of the aortic valve via employing a prosthetic mechanical valve. Attempts at valvuloplasty for the treatment of traumatic aortic valve injury have not been uniformly successful, and prosthetic valve replacement is recommended for repair, except for highly selected cases.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.102-112
• /
• 2002

This study was undertaken to analyze the outcome of composite valve graftreplacement(CVGR) for the treatment of aneurysms of the ascending aorta involving the aortic root. Material and Method: Between April 1995 and June 2001, 56 patients had replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic root with a composite graft valve and were reviewed retrospectively. Aortic regurgitation was present in 50 patients(89%), Marfan's syndrome in 18 patients(32%), and bicuspid aortic valve in 7(12.5%). The indications for operation were annuloaortic ectasia(AAE) in 30 patients(53.6%), aortic dissection in 13(23.2%), aneurysms of the ascending aorta involving aortic root in 11(19.6%), and aortitis in 2(3.6%). Cardiogenic shock due to the aortic rupture was present in 2 patients. Nine patients(16%) had previous operations on the ascending aorta or open heart surgery. The operative techniques used for CVGR were the aortic button technique in 51 patients(91%), the modified Cabrol technique in 4, and the classic Bentall technique in 1. The concomitant procedures were aortic arch replacement in 24 patients(43%), coronary artery bypass graft in 8(14.3%), mitral valve repair in 2, redo mitral valve replacement in 1, and the others in 7 The mean time of circulatory arrest, total bypass, and aortic crossclamp were 21$\pm$14 minutes, 186$\pm$68 minutes, and 132$\pm$42 minutes, respectively. Result: Early mortality was 1.8%(1/56). The postoperative complications were left ventricular dysfunction in 16 patients(28.6%), reoperation for bleeding in 7(12.5%), pericardial effusion in 2, and the others in 7. Fifty-three patients out of 55 hospital survivors were followed up for a mean of 23.2 $\pm$ 18.7 months(1-75 months). There were two late deaths(3.8%) including one death due to the traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, and CVGR-related late mortality was 1.9%. The 1- and 6-year actuarial survival was 98.1$\pm$1.9% and 93.2$\pm$5.1%, respectively. Two patients required reoperation for complication of CYGR(3.8%) and two other patients required subsequent operations for dissection of the remaining thoracoabdominal aorta. The 1- and 6-year actuarial freedom from reoperation was 97.8$\pm$2.0% and 65.3$\pm$26.7%, respectively.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.170-177
• /
• 2013

Total elbow arthroplasty is still in its infancy compared with other arthroplasties, such as knee or hip arthroplasties. Implant design has been evolving with clinical experiences; however, there are only limited data on the long-term clinical outcome of elbow arthroplasty in the literature. The design of total elbow prostheses can be divided into three categories: linked (constrained or semi-constrained), unlinked (unconstrained), and convertible types. The choice between an unlinked (unconstrained) implant and a linked (semi-constrained) implant depends on joint stability and adequacy of the bone stock. Linked elbow arthroplasty has provided high patient satisfaction, and pain relief thanks to proper patient selection, advancement of implant design, improvement in cement techniques, meticulous surgical technique, and appropriate postoperative rehabilitation. Concerns remain about the use of this implant in young or high-demand patients. This article focuses on the linked (semi-constrained) prostheses, which provides an overview of the current state of linked total elbow arthroplasty.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.35 no.5
• /
• pp.356-364
• /
• 2002

Background: This study was undertaken to investigate the outcome of composite graft aortic root replacement using coronary button reimplantation technique for the treatment of aneurysms of the ascending aorta involving the aortic root. Material and Method: Between April 1995 and September 2001, 54 patients having aortic root replacement with a composite valve graft using direct coronary button reimplantation were reviewed retrospectively. Left ventricular dysfunction was present in 14 patients(25.9%), aortic regurgitation in 48(89%), and Marfan's syndrome in 17(31.5%). The indications for operation were annuloaortic ectasia in 29 patients(53.7%), aortic dissection in 11(20.4%), aneurysms of the ascending aorta involving aortic root in 12(22.2%), and aortitis in 2(3.7%). Six patients(11.1%) had previous cardiac or ascending aortic operations. Concomitant procedures were arch replacement in 21 patients(38.9%), coronary artery bypass graft in 7(13%), mitral valve repair or replacement in 4(7.4%), and others in 6. The mean time of circulatory arrest, total bypass, and aortic crossclamp were 18 $\pm$ 9 minutes, 177 $\pm$ 42 minutes, and 127 $\pm$ 31 minutes, respectively. Result: There was 1 early death(1.9%). Mean follow-up was 24.6$\pm$ 19.5 months. There were two late deaths(3.8%) including one death due to the traumatic cerebral hemorrhage. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 98.0 $\pm$ 2.0% and 93.1 $\pm$ 5.1% at 1 and 6 years, respectively. Two patients required reoperation owing to a false aneurysm at the root anastomosis site and a malfunction of prosthetic aortic valve(3.8%). Staged operation for dissection of the remaining thoracoabdominal aorta was performed in 1 patient. The freedom rate from reoperation was 97.8 $\pm$ 2.0% and 65.3 $\pm$ 26.7% at 1 and 6 years, respectively.