• Title/Summary/Keyword: 치조제 보존술

Search Result 20, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Periimplant bone change after alveolar ridge preservation: radiographic retrospective study (발치와 치조제 보존술 후 식립한 임플란트 주위 골 변화: 후향적 방사선학적 분석)

  • Shim, Da-Eun;Pang, Eun-Kyoung
    • The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
    • /
    • v.59 no.3
    • /
    • pp.281-290
    • /
    • 2021
  • Purpose. The aim of this study is to evaluate bone change around the implant in patients who underwent alveolar ridge preservation for implantation in the posterior teeth using radiographic data measuring changes of mesial, distal crestal bone level according to post-implantation, post-final prosthesis delivery and follow-up periods. Materials and methods. In total, 36 implants were placed in 32 patients. The mesial and distal crestal bone level of all the areas where alveolar ridge preservation was performed uses panoramic images taken post-implantation, post-final prosthesis delivery, and follow-up period each was measured and evaluated as a vertical value. The following factors were analyzed: associations between changes of crestal bone level and factors (e.g., age, sex, systemic diseases, dentist, implant location, tooth, bone type, membrane). The statistical analysis was performed using the mean, standard deviation and independent t-test, paired t-test (P < .05). Results. Analysis of crestal bone level differences between periods shows statistically significant differences (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference when the changes of crestal bone level between post-implantation, post-final prosthesis delivery and follow-up periods were correlated with each factors. Conclusion. After alveolar ridge preservation, bone around the implant remained stable during the maintenance period without being affected by the patient and surgical factors, and alveolar ridge preservation is considered a clinically usable procedure.

The use of granulation tissue for the esthetic implant restoration for missing tooth due to alveolar bone loss (치조골 소실로 발치하게 된 치아의 심미적인 임플란트 수복을 위한 granulation tissue의 활용)

  • Lee, Chang Kyun
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-39
    • /
    • 2021
  • When maxillary anterior tooth is extracted due to alveolar bone loss, the augmentation of alveolar ridge is very important for esthetic implant restoration. Because alveolar bone loss increases after extraction, the ridge preservation performed right after tooth extraction is meaningful for esthetic implant restoration. However, no achievement of primary closure during ridge preservation can negatively affect bone regeneration. To overcome this problem, we can use granulation tissue in the extraction socket for primary closure. This case report confirmed that primary closure using granulation tissue resulted in not only ridge preservation but also ridge augmentation by providing an environment more advantageous of bone regeneration than the open wound.

Alveolar ridge preservation using granulation tissue for esthetic implant restoration on maxillary anterior tooth (상악 전치부의 심미적 임플란트 수복을 위한 육아 조직(Granulation tissue)을 이용한 치조제 보존술)

  • Lee Chang Kyun
    • Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
    • /
    • v.32 no.1
    • /
    • pp.16-22
    • /
    • 2023
  • Esthetic factors are very important in the success of maxillary anterior implant restoration. However, achieving esthetic results is difficult, especially in cases where periodontitis has resulted in severe alveolar bone loss. In the case of maxillary anterior teeth, the alveolar ridge resorption that begins immediately after tooth extraction interferes with the esthetic implant restoration. Therefore immediate implant placement can be performed to minimize the alveolar ridge resorption. However, in severe bone loss cases, immediate implant placement could result in esthetic failure, and this result might cause irreparable problems. We can also perform alveolar ridge preservation and then place implants later. On JCP published in 2019, there is the consensus of European academy of periodontology on the extraction socket management and the timing of implant placement. This consensus states that alveolar ridge preservation should be considered when there is severe labial bone loss in an esthetically important area such as maxillary anterior region. On performing the alveolar ridge preservation, we cannot obtain the primary wound closure, so secondary wound healing is induced with open membrane technique or soft tissue grafting should be performed for primary wound closure. However, the secondary wound healing can have a negative impact on bone regeneration, and soft tissue grafting such as FGG or CT graft can be burdensome for both patients and dentists. On the other hand, by using the granulation tissue in the extraction socket, primary closure can be achieved without soft tissue grafting. Also some studies have shown that granulation tissue in periodontal defects contains stem cells that may help in tissue regeneration. Based on this, implant restorations were performed on maxillary anterior teeth with severe alveolar bone loss by alveolar ridge preservation using granulation tissue. In spite of the severe bone defect of the extraction socket, relatively esthetic results could be obtained in implant restorations.

Retrospective radiographic and clinical analysis of implant survival placed after alveolar ridge preservation (발치와 치조제 보존술 시행 후 식립한 임플란트의 방사선학적 및 임상적 후향적 연구)

  • Lee, Sung-Jo;Jang, Hyun;Shin, Hyun-Seung;Park, Jung-Chul;Song, Young-Gyun;Cho, In-Woo
    • Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
    • /
    • v.34 no.3
    • /
    • pp.167-174
    • /
    • 2018
  • Purpose: The purpose of present study was to retrospectively analyze the survival rate of implant placed after alveolar ridge preservation by initial stability and radiographic measurements. Materials and Methods: In total, 19 patients who received 21 sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) implants were enrolled in this retrospective study. Implants placed after alveolar ridge preservation technique (ARP) 2 - 3 months healing period, Periotest value (PTV) measured at implant placement and before placed prosthodontics. Marginal bone level (MBL) was measured at implant placement and final recall check. Results: Overall survival rate of implant was 100%. Mean PTV at implant placement was $-0.06{\pm}8.33$ and mean PTV before placed prosthodontics was $-5.75{\pm}1.7$. The range of MBL change was from -0.55 mm to 1.6 mm (Mean: $0.19{\pm}0.58mm$). Conclusion: The findings of present study suggest that the implant paced after alveolar ridge preservation appear high survival rates and stable MBL.