• 제목/요약/키워드: 치조능확장술

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.017초

치조능확장술과 자가치아골이식술을 이용한 치조능 수평증대술: 증례보고 (Horizontal Ridge Augmentation using Ridge Expansion and Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft: A Case Report)

  • 김영균;이양진
    • 구강회복응용과학지
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.109-115
    • /
    • 2011
  • 점차적으로 폭경이 증가하는 나사들을 이용하여 치조능확장술을 시행하고 임프란트를 식립하였다. 임상적으로 양호한 결과를 얻었으며 수술 중 협측 피질골판 골절은 발생하지 않았다. 임프란트 주변 결손부와 협측 피질골판 상방에 자가치아골이식재를 이식함으로써 부가적인 치조능 확장 효과와 동시에 협측 피질골판 흡수를 보상하였다. 치조능 폭경이 협소한 부위에 임프란트를 식립할 때 나사를 이용한 확장술은 성공적이고 예측 가능한 술식이며 자가치아골이식재는 치조능증대술과 골유도재생술을 위해 사용될 수 있다.

좁은 치조골에 변형된 치조능 분할술/확장술을 이용한 임플란트 동시 식립 : 3 가지 증례보고 (Simultaneous Implant Placement with Modified Ridge Splitting/Expansion Technique in the Narrow Edentulous Alveolar Ridge : 3 Cases Report)

  • 이종빈;이재홍;김영택
    • 대한치과의사협회지
    • /
    • 제53권8호
    • /
    • pp.545-557
    • /
    • 2015
  • The modified ridge splitting/expansion technique combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) for implant surgery is used to expand the narrow and atrophied edentulous alveolar ridge. Also, the simultaneous implant placement after ridge splitting/expansion technique can reduce the treatment and healing time. This case report includes three patients with a narrow edentulous alveolar ridge of the 2 to 4mm. All three patients underwent a fracture of thin buccal cortical bone plate, and these defects were corrected by the use of the guided bone regeneration (GBR). After 7 to 18 months, all surgical area was stable, and all implant showed a good healing state on the clinical and radiographic examination. In conclusion, though this surgical method is technique sensitive, the modified ridge splitting/expansion technique combined with GBR for implant surgery is recommended for a horizontal augmentation in the narrow edentulous alveolar ridge.

매우 얇은 치조골에서 치조능 분할 확장술을 통한 임플란트 치료 (Ridge split for implant placement in very thin alveolar ridge)

  • 김신근;이희성;박종욱;남종훈;복성철;박기남;최동주
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제37권3호
    • /
    • pp.229-233
    • /
    • 2011
  • For implant treatment there must be sufficient bone to house the implant body. At least 5mm wide residual bone is needed and usually a 6mm width is preferred by clinicians. However, surgeons sometimes find patients with a narrow ridge, which makes it difficult to place an implant. Therefore, many clinicians perform bone graft or a ridge splitting technique to overcome these poor conditions. The time and cost can be reduced using the ridge splitting technique with immediate implant placement. Recently, many studies reported reliable consequences of ridge splitting technique. This paper reports a successful of implant placement with a ridge splitting technique in a very thin alveolar ridge.

치조능확장골절단술을 이용한 임프란트 식립술의 유용성 평가 (Evaluation of the Availability of Implant placement using Ridge Expansion Osteotomy (REO))

  • 김영균;윤필영;김범수
    • 대한치과의사협회지
    • /
    • 제46권4호
    • /
    • pp.243-247
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose : Ridge expansion osteotomy (REO) has been introduced when it is necessary to expand narrow crestal ridge with simultaneous implant placement. This study has designed to evaluate the clinical availability of REO. Materials and methods : Subject were patients who had visited Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from July. 2003 to December, 2005 for implant placement using REO by one surgeon. Intraoperative and postoperative complication, failure of initial osseointegration and marginal bone resorption were estimated using electronic medical record and periapical radiography. Twenty?three patients, 8 males and 15 females, mean age 51, ranged 18 to 72, were treated for mean 26 months, ranged from 16 months to 46 months. Results : Mean diameter and length of implants placed at upper anterior, were 3.72mm and 13.32mm each other. Guided bone regeneration and ridge splitting were accompanied in this study. Five cases of cortical bone fracture, three cases of crestal bone loss more than 2mm, 2cases of gingival recession, and 2 cases of infection were noted, but there were no implants removed because of disintegration. Success rate of implant was 91.7%, even if survival rate of implant was 100%. In addition, there were no statistical significance between the success rate of REO and bone graft(p>0.05). Conclusion : Based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that REO technique is reliable for implant placement at atrophic ridge with adequate height compared to bone graft and other osteotomies for ridge expansion, but care should be taken of esthetic problem such as gingival recession because of crestal bone resorption from trauma by osteotome.

  • PDF