• Title/Summary/Keyword: 최대 배리어 침입거리

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Bumper Stay Design for RCAR Front Low Speed Impact Test (RCAR 전방 저속 충돌시험 대응 범퍼 스테이 설계)

  • Kang, Sungjong
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.191-197
    • /
    • 2016
  • RCAR low speed impact test estimates repair cost of the impacted vehicle. In this study, for a mid-size vehicle front body model, structural performance for RCAR low speed impact were analyzed with changing the bumper stay shape and size. First, for improving the impact load transfer mechanism to side member the stay rear section shape at connecting area with side member was modified and the stay outer was redesigned to be normal to the barrier. Next, the investigation on stay thickness effect was carried out and the performances of several models with different forming shape were compared. The final design showed 13mm decrease in the maximum barrier intrusion distance and greatly reduced side member deformation. Additional analyses explained the validity of the final design.

Design of Bumper Backbeam Center Reinforcement Bracket for IIHS Full Overlap Bumper Test (IIHS 풀 오버랩 범퍼 시험 대응 범퍼 백빔 중앙 보강재 설계)

  • Kang, Sungjong
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Automotive Engineers
    • /
    • v.23 no.1
    • /
    • pp.105-111
    • /
    • 2015
  • Since 2007, Insurance Institute of Highway Safety(IIHS) has conducted the new bumper test using bumper barrier to estimate the repair cost of impacted vehicle. In this study, for the front body FE model of a medium size passenger car analyzes were carried out to optimize the shape of backbeam center reinforcement bracket. First, overlap effect was examined with changing the overlap magnitude and spot welds were added along the backbeam center line for reducing the section shear deformation. Next, for an overlap model design parameter study was performed for the bracket. Thickness effect was examined and an inner reinforcement was added to the bracket. Also, the lower part of bracket was deleted and additionally the bracket length was extended. The results were discussed in terms of backbeam backward deflection, barrier backstop intrusion and weight. Compared with the current design, the final model showed 44.1% bracket weight reduction with 30.0% decrease of backbeam deflection.