• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.60-67
• /
• 1994

본 연구는 아동의 자기-효능감을 측정할 수 있는 검사도구를 개발하는데 그 목적을 두고 있다 연구대상자는 554명의 국민학교 5, 6학년 아동들로서, 선행연구를 중심으로 구성 한 문항들에 대한 몇 차례의 예비조사를 통하여 최종 23문항을 선정하였고 척도 구성을 위 한 검증 결과는 다음과 같다. 척도의 문항 양호도 검증을 위한 문항의 반응율과 변별도 분 석결과는 대체로 양호하게 나타났으며 척도의 타당도 검증을 위한 요인분석 결과 본 검사도 구가 세 요인으로 구성되어 있는 것으로 확인되었다. 신뢰도 분석 결과는 Cronbach's a 값 이 .62에서 .79로 나타났다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.67 no.2
• /
• pp.61-84
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to develop the Post-bereavement Growth Inventory(PBGI) for the elderly and to evaluate its validity. The items for developing PBGI were compiled from a literature search, content validity review, and a preliminary survey. A main survey of 308 widowed persons(aged 60+) was conducted. The results were as follows. First, an exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors of the PBGI. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure for the final 24 scale items of scale. Second, in terms of concurrent validity, the PGBI compared favorably with the "Personal Growth" scale from The Hogan Grief Reaction Checklist (HGRC: Hogan and Schimdt, 2001). Third, the results of contrast group validity tests demonstrated that the group scoring in the upper 30% on the scales of Psychological Well-being (PWB, Ryff and Keyes, 1995) and the Grief Reaction Inventory (GRI: Remondet and Hansson, 1987) showed a significantly higher degree of post-bereavement growth (PBG) than the group scoring in the lower 30%. Fourth, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ values for the five factors were between .649-.856 and .907 overall, indicating high internal consistency. Finally, education had the most significant influence on PBG. All results indicated the high validity of the PBGI. The findings from this study could provide the rationale for practical interventions from a growth-oriented perspective for widowed persons, as well as an objective assessment tool for practitioners in clinical areas.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.59 no.4
• /
• pp.245-272
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to create and validate Scale of Resilience to Burnout and Scale of Burnout Risk for social workers in medical settings. For the purpose, instrument development model, a kind of mixed methods research was used. In the first phase, six dimensions of resilience(: professional competency, accomplishment and worthwhileness, firm belief and value about their profession, good teamwork, support by their agency, and individual resources) and six dimensions of risk to burnout(: dissatisfaction with organizational condition, interpersonal stress among team members, organizational conflict, work related stress, deficiency of professionalism, and individual stress) were suggested thorough the preceding papers with qualitative approaches. The second phase involved analysis of a survey of 185 participants that appeared to validate the dimensions of the measures. The construct validity and reliability of each measure were tested. And it was founded that there were its own factors in each concept, although resilience to burnout related negatively to burnout risk. The results of this study suggest mixed methods research is useful to develop measures reflecting voices in the social work field.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 1995

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 가족 연구와 가족생활교육 및 가족상담 장면에서 활용될 수 있는 가족의 건강도 척도를 개발하는 것이다. 선행연구 및 관련 척도 고찰을 통하여 하위 요인 및 문항을 구성하였고, 문항의 적합도와 안면 타당도 검증 과정을 거쳐 예비조사 도구 100문항이 구성되었다. 가족생활주기별로 344명의 어머니를 대상으로 하였으며, 문항양호도를 파악하기 위하여 X^2$ 값과 Cramer의 V계수를 산출하였고, 척도의 구인타당도를 검증하기 위하여 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 4개 요인(가족간의 의사소통, 가족간의 몰입, 가족원의 적응력, 가족 가치관)이 추출되었으며, 이들은 전체적으로 57%의 설명력을 갖는다. 또한 회귀분석을 실시하여 각 요인별 문항을 선정함으로서 최종적으로 34문항이 구성되었다. '가족 건강도' 척도 및 그 하위 요인과 ${\ulcorner}Family\;Adaptability\;and\;Cohesion\;Evaluation\;Scale{\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}Family\;Stengths\;Scale{\lrcorner}$과의 상관계수는 .25에서 .56사이로 나타나 본 척도의 공인타당도가 입증되었다. 척도의 신뢰도는 Cronbach의 a계수 .94로 나타났으며, 하위요인별로는 .80에서 .91로 만족스럽게 나타났다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.48 no.2
• /
• pp.97-119
• /
• 2017

The current study aims to validate Employment Hope Scale (EHS), a dimension of Psychological Self-Sufficiency (PSS) scale, among self-sufficiency program participants in South Korea. Self-sufficiency has been understood primarily from an economic perspective in both policies and studies, with which the process participants changes has been ignored and neglected. This study suggests psychological approach to self-sufficiency programs for the paradigm shift to 'client-centered' practice. In this regard, this study tests the validity of EHS using exploratory factor analsysi (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in South Korea, developed from a bottom-up client-centered approach and found a 4-factor 17-item structure as Korean EHS(K-EHS). The study results indicate that the K-EHS can be used as a valid supplementary process evaluation tool for self-sufficiency programs.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare
• /
• no.36
• /
• pp.231-259
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Parental Satisfaction Scale for Child Care Centers, which modified the Client Satisfaction Scale (CSS; Kim, 2009). The subjects of the study were 652 parents of children who were between the ages of one to five and who attended child care centers. The five-point rating scale consisted of 21 items with two sub-dimensions. The results from an exploratory factor analysis identified that there are two dimensions in this scale. Thus, in terms of the face validity of this scale, a two-dimensional scale with 21 items is found to be appropriate. However, the items that consist of the two sub-dimensions are found to be different from that of CSS. The concurrent validity and internal consistency reliability of the revised scale are relatively high. Also, the mean between the upper and lower groups with regard to item discrimination show significant difference. We conclude that the original CSS with minor revisions can be used as a valid and reliable instrument to assess parental satisfaction on child care centers.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.59-78
• /
• 2012

This study confirmed the structural concept and preliminary statements based on concept definition of archival service quality, conducted statistical analysis, and developed the service quality scale equipped with validity and reliability. Developing the scale is unique for pubic institutions and expected to play a practical role in presenting for each archive more effective operation method to enhance service quality by diagnosing its status and identifying the differences from other archives.

• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.27 no.12
• /
• pp.1141-1154
• /
• 2000

본 논문에서는 Java 프로그램의 복잡도를 측정하기 위해 필요한 인자들을 제안하였다. 이러한 인자들을 추출하기 위해 Java 프로그램을 분석하여 객체지향 설계 척도 값들을 계산하고 통계적 분석을 수행하였다. 그 결과 기존의 연구에서 발견되었던 클래스의 크기 인자 외에도 메소드 호출 빈도, 응집도, 자식 클래스의 수, 내부 클래스 및 상속 계층의 깊이가 주요 인자임이 파악되었다. 클래스의 크기 척도로 분류되었던 자식 클래스의 수는 다른 크기 척도들과 다른 성질을 가진다는 것을 발견하였다. 또한 프로그램의 크기가 커지고 결합도가 높아질수록 응집도가 떨어진다는 것을 입증하였다. 그리고 인자 분석을 바탕으로 인간의 인지 능력과 인자의 상관관계를 고려한 가중치를 적용하기 위해 인자별로 회귀분석을 수행하였다. 보다 적은 척도를 가지고 인자를 설명할 수 있는 회귀식을 도출하였다. 두 그룹에 대한 교차 검증 결과 회귀식이 높은 신뢰도를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 논문에서 제안한 인자들을 이용하는 경우 Java 프로그램의 복잡도를 측정할 수 있는 새로운 척도로 사용할 수 있다.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.345-368
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to develop the School Multicultural Climate(SMC) scale for students and to evaluate its reliability and validity. This study comprises of both qualitative and quantitative research. Preliminary items were developed based on the theoretical literature and interviews with students. The scale was evaluated with students in grades 4 through 6 in the seven elementary schools. Exploratory factor analysis was determined that the scale was composed of four components: Equal Status, Mutual Cooperation, Friendly Relations, Supportive Norms. The scale demonstrated that Cronbach's alpha=.943 for the internal consistency of total items. And the standard error of the measurement, another way of evaluating reliability, was 3.33. Criteria-related validity was evaluated by showing that the differences of the students' recognition of the school multicultural climate level, which depend on the availability of the multiculture-related policy, was statistically significant. The correlation analysis for the convergent validity was performed with the theoretically related variables such as self esteem and school adjustment. It was found that the SMC scale was a reliable and valid measure for evaluating the multicultural climate level of elementary school.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.595-616
• /
• 2023

The Critical Consciousness Scale (CCS) is a scale developed by Diemer and colleagues (2017) that can measure the capacity of the oppressed or marginalized people to critically analyze their social and political conditions, support societal equality, and take action to change the perceived inequities. In this study, we validated the CCS for Korea by adapting and localizing the scale and validating it among university students. Content validity was verified by having five individuals with master's and doctoral degrees in psychology evaluate the suitability of the translated items. Afterwards, reliability and validity were verified through a survey of 314 university students nationwide using the CCS, along with the opportunity inequality recognition scale, recognition of the need for environmental change scale, social participation scale, and belief in a just world scale. To verify the scale's validity, exploratory factor analysis was conducted, confirming three subfactors. Then, a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out, where 14 items out of the original 22 were retained. The construct validity and reliability of these 14 items were found to be satisfactory. Additionally, in the correlation analysis between the CCS and similar scales, a significant clear relationship was found. The CCS showed a positive correlation with scales such as opportunity inequality recognition, need for environmental change recognition, and social participation, and a negative correlation with the belief in a just world scale. Based on these results, the CCS can be considered valid and reliable. Finally, the limitations and significance of this study were discussed.