• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The aim of this study is to calculate U-factor of the window using international standard methods and compare quantitative and tendency difference focused on ISO standard 15099 and ISO standard 10077. And the result of ISO standard calculation methods is verified using thermal performance experiment to evaluate applicability of domestic certification system. This study is utilized a basis for activation of domestic window certification system. Method: First, 16 cases are selected that is combined a variety of frame, Glazing, spacer, etc. The selected cases were simulated using WINDOW&THERM based on ISO 15099 and 10077 calculation method. Second, experiment was conducted based on Korean standard condition. Then, it was compared the error of experiment and simulation results. Through this process, ISO 15099 and 10077 calculation methods were evaluated accuracy and utilization. Result: The results show that the difference of ISO 15099 and ISO 10077-2 is maximum 5.4%. The results of comparing U-factor errors based on the Korea standard experiment test found 2.4%. Consequently, it will be possible to combination calculation methods of ISO 15099 and ISO 10077 for a single window.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2018년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.306-307
• /
• 2018

In Korea, The thermal resistance test of window sets is performed according to KS F 2278 standard, and is performed only on a specimen size of 2000 × 2000 (mm). In this study, a standard panel measuring 4000 × 3000 (mm) size was used to measure the heat flux in each part of the specimen, and to calculate the resistance to heat transfer And to seize whether the KS F 2278 standard is applicable to large Specimen.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.79-85
• /
• 2016

Purpose: It is difficult to calculate frame U-value because of the two reason. First is selection of air properties in cavity. Second is calculation method in window frame. For this reason, it is important to decide cavity properties in window frame. However, international standards offered different method(ISO 15099, ISO 10077) and air properties was changed according to the two methods. The aim of this study was to suggest method for deriving accurate frame U-value using international standard methods and CFD simulation. Method: First, this study conducted analysis calculation method of ISO 15099 and ISO 10077. And, CFD simulation conducted based on same condition. Finally, ISO calculation and CFD simulation results were verified through comparison with real experiment results. Result: The results show that effective conductivity of ISO 15099 was the highest value. ISO 10077 and CFD result followed. The convergent values of ISO 10077 was the highest. ISO 15099 and CFD followed. ISO calculation reflecting CFD simulation results will reduce error with experimental results.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.43-51
• /
• 2015

현재 우리나라의 중소창호업계는 글레이징과 창프레임 제조가 별도의 산업체로 분리되어 있다. 그러나, 창호에너지소비효율 등급제와 건물의 에너지절약설계기준에 따르면, 창호의 열관류율 기준은 글레이징과 창프레임을 일체화시킨 창세트에 의해 정의된다. 대부분의 창호제조 중소업체는 글레이징과 프레임부분을 통합하는 생산체계를 갖추지 못하고 있으며, 대부분의 공사현장에서 창호는 별도로 납품된 유리와 프레임을 설치하는 방식으로 시공된다. 이러한 현실과 제도를 연결할 수 있는 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 우선 창호에너지소비효율등급제의 현장상황을 조사 분석하였다. 그 결과, 창호에너지소비효율 등급제에 대한 이해도는 전반적으로 높았으나, 만족도는 낮았으며, 공사현장에서는 공장제조된 일체화된 시스템의 창호가 아니라 현장조립에 의한 창호를 사용하는 것이 일반적으로, 현재의 등급제가 현장에서 잘 적용된다고 확신하지 못하는 상황이었다. 따라서, '창호에너지소비효율등급제'는 산업현장의 현실성을 돌이켜보고, 이론적으로 치우칠 것이 아니라, 현실적인 대안을 제시해야 한다.