• Title/Summary/Keyword: 중심 X선 입사각도

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Error Analysis of General X-ray Examination by Using Simulation Training (시뮬레이션 교육을 통한 일반 X선 검사의 오류 분석)

  • Seoung, Youl-Hun
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.12 no.7
    • /
    • pp.919-927
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study was to present simulation training model for general X-ray examinations and to analyze the errors that occur during the simulation training. From 2012 to 2018, a total of 183 students (77 men and 106 women) participated. The simulated X-ray system used computed radiography (CR) system. The contents of simulation training were patient's care, X-ray examinations accuracy, images stability, etc. As a result, it were found that the patient's position setting error, the accuracy error of the X-ray beam central ray, the image receptor's size and setting error, the error of the grid use, the marking error, and the error of X-ray exposure technical factors. It is expected that improved practical general X-ray examinations training of radiographer will be needed, focusing on these errors, so that we could contribute to the health care of the people by providing precise examinations and high quality medical service.

The Assessment of Tube Incidence Angle for Minimizing the Patellofemoral Joint Overlap Distance in Merchant View (Merchant 검사 시 슬개대퇴관절 겹침 최소화를 위한 중심 X선 입사각에 대한 평가)

  • Ko, Ye-Weon;Joo, Young-Cheol;Kim, Min-suk;Go, Yu-Rim
    • Journal of radiological science and technology
    • /
    • v.43 no.3
    • /
    • pp.161-167
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study aimed to found out the effect of patellofemoral overlap distance by changing femur thickness and center X-ray angles in Merchant method images. Based on the femur thickness, it suggested tube angle minimizes overlap. It was conducted by Merchant method, a knee tangential view, and the image was obtained by changing the thigh thickness from 14 to 20 cm and the center ray angle from 60°, 57°, 55°. The images were measured by five researchers using a method of measuring the overlap, which was designed by them. The results showed at 60°, 57°, 55° angle, the patellofemoral overlap distance resulted in 0.47±0.66 to 20.89±0.65 cm, 2.26±0.28 to 15.73±0.62 cm, 1.39 ± 0.83 to 12.49 ± 0.37 cm. However, for 57° and 55°, no overlap in thickness under 14.5 and 14 to 15.5 didn't appear. it showed high correlation between femur thickness and overlap. The difference in the mean value of overlap in each group showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01), all were classified as independent groups in the post-hoc test. In all images, the patellofemoral overlap distance increased as the thickness increased, and at the average thickness of Korean men and women, overlap decreased when reducing center ray. When conducting Merchant tests on Koreans, it was suggested it would be useful to use 57° angle because it minimize the effects of overlap and intrusions of tibia.

A Study on the Accuracy and Convenience of Imaging Method Using Support Device in Knee Joint Lateral Radiography (슬관절의 측면 방사선 촬영에서 보조기구를 이용한 검사방법의 정확성과 편의성에 대한 연구)

  • Uhm, Soyeong;Cho, Yongkeun;Kang, Sungjin
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.11 no.4
    • /
    • pp.253-262
    • /
    • 2017
  • In lateral projection imaging method of knee joint, a method that adjusts the incidence angle of central X-ray toward the head side to $5{\sim}7^{\circ}$ in true lateral position which is existing recommended is called imaging method A, Method of imaging the central X-ray perpendicular to the horizontal plane of the examination table toward the knee is called imaging method B, and a method in which the central X-ray is perpendicularly applied to the joints while the lateral side of the distal tibia is compensated by radiolucent materials is called as method C. After tests each imaging method to classified study subject respectively, the joint space distance and the distance between lateral and medial condyle of femur were measured and compared as the quantitative index from the three imaging methods. In addition, the convenience of each imaging method was confirmed through questionnaires to practician. According to the result of the quantitative index, there is no statistically significant difference in imaging method A and C(p>0.05). However, imaging method B showed a significant difference in both A and C(p<0.05). As a result of evaluating the convenience of the imaging method, imaging method A was relatively assessed lower in all items than imaging methods B and C, and as a small difference, imaging method B is assessed higher than C. In this study suggested new knee joint lateral projection imaging method, by using a simple support device, could describe joint space as not much different as existing recommended method without some complex process, and could increase convenience of the practician in the process of the imaging.