• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.34 no.8 s.387
• /
• pp.90-91
• /
• 2001

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 1998.02c
• /
• pp.37-45
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2000.06a
• /
• pp.191-196
• /
• 2000

• Journal of the Korean Society of Costume
• /
• v.13
• /
• pp.80-103
• /
• 1989

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.258
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 1999

• Proceedings of the Costume Culture Conference
• /
• 2002.06a
• /
• pp.54-55
• /
• 2002

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.321
• /
• pp.12-12
• /
• 2002

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.38
• /
• pp.475-500
• /
• 2005

• Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
• /
• no.19
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 1999

This study is about the Characteristics of the Medievalism expressed in the German Architectural Expressionism. The concept of Medievalism is an attitude to revive the social and physical settings on Middle Ages. The social situation and architectural style in the Middle Ages were similar to the German Expressionism in the early 20th-century. The Medieval Characteristics of the German Architectural Expressionism were expressed in two ways -first, organic or sculptural style and second, fantastic or Crystal style. The architects such as Hermann Finsterlin, Henry van de Velde, Erich Mendelsohn, Rudolf Steiner, Hugo H ring, Hans Poelzig belonged to the first tendency, and such as Paul Scheerbart, Bruno Taut, Otto Bartning, Dominikus B hm belonged to the second tendency. The Medieval concept of the German architectural Expressionism was succeeded to Modern Architecture in 1950-1960s'. The architects in 1950-1960's such as Hans Scharoun, Gottfried B hm, Alvar Aalto, J rn Utzon intended to express organic and fantastic mass which was closely connected with the Medival concept of the German architectural Expressionism.

• Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
• /
• no.41
• /
• pp.163-171
• /
• 2003

The scope of the study involves comparison of theaters in the west and those in the east, which experienced almost no exchange between them in the past, due to diverse restrains including a geographical one. The focus was put on the two types of these theaters whose similarities are meager historically and technologically, and whose link was not verified yet. However, similarities ,if any, will be identified among characteristics of these theaters so that the links such as liberalism, nomadic and participatory nature, non-linear space, ambivalence, mobile space-which are modern characteristics- could be connected from the past to the present, and those modern characteristics can be studied as a process where they could be sensed from the past structure or from each different target.