• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.1-31
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 LISREL모형을 이용하여 우리나라 266개 상장기업을 대상으로 기업다각화와 기업가치간의 영향관계를 분석하고, 다각화 및 기업가치 결정요인을 분석하였다. 분석결과 첫째, 90년대 초반까지는 다각화가 초과가치를 발생시켰지만, 90년대 중반 이후에는 다각화에 의한 사업운영방식이 부의 초과가치를 발생시켜 기업가치에 부정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 다각화는 기업의 시장가치에 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나, 시장에서는 다각화된 기업을 전문화된 기업보다 더 높게 평가하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 기업의 다각화수준에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 외부대주주지분을, 레버리지비율, 기업설립연수, 기업규모, 계열기업 여부 등으로 파악되었다. 90년대 초반까지는 외부대주주지분율이 높고, 기업설립연수가 오래되고, 계열기업에 속해 있고, 규모가 작은 기업의 경우 다각화수준이 낮게 나타났지만, 90년대 중반 이후에는 이와 같은 특성을 가진 기업의 다각화수준이 높아지는 것으로 분석되었다. 레버리지비율은 기업의 다각화수준과 일관되게 정의 영향관계를 보여, 차입자금을 이용하여 다각화를 추진하는 우리나라 기업의 현실적 상황을 확인할 수 있었다. 넷째, 다각화의 초과가치에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 외부대주주지분을, 레버리지비율, 기업규모, 계열기업 여부 등으로 파악되었다. 90년대 초반에는 외부대주주지분율이 높고, 기업규모가 작고, 계열기업에 속한 기업들이 다각화를 통해 정의 초과가치를 획득할 수 있었지만, 90년대 중반 이후에는 외부대주주지분율이 낮고, 기업규모가 크고, 계열기업에 속하지 않은 기업이 다각화에 의해 초과가치를 얻을 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 레버리지는 그 비율이 높을수록 다각화의 초과가치가 크게 나타나는 것으로 분석되어, 다각화 기업이 더 많은 부채부담능력을 가질 수 있고, 부채의 세금절감효과에 의해 기업가치를 증가시킬 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.5
• /
• pp.8-17
• /
• 2017

Using 1855 observations from 5 years-371 firms panel data during 2010 to 2014 in Chinese stock exchanges, this study examines the impact of managers' ownership on R & D expenditures. The empirical study finds that when firms are state-owned, managers' ownership have negative relation with the level of R & D expenses as well as the likelihood of executing R & D investment, implying that managers are less likely to invest in high risky projects due to managerial ownership's entrenchment effects to pursue private benefits rather than alignment of interest effect as shareholders. The empirical study also finds that when firms are private-owned, managerial ownership are inverse U shaped related to the level of R & D expenses, implying that managers are less likely to invest in high risky projects due to increasing risk aversion resulting from concentration of private wealth at its high level while managers are more likely to invest in high risky projects due to increasing incentives as shareholders at its low level. The results support that the effects of managerial ownership on R & D expenses may be different according to the ownership type of Chinese listed firms.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.145-158
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of the ownership structure of unlisted firms on KOSDAQ listing. There are few studies analyzing the characteristics of listing success based on ownership structure. For startup executives, there is not enough data to refer to the ownership structure that can increase the possibility of listing. This paper examines the effects of ownership structure on IPO success through comparison between listed successful and failed companies among the companies in application for KOSDAQ listing eligibility review. The major findings are as follows; (1) Venture capital investment and shareholding have a statistically positive effect on the success of KOSDAQ listing. This results indicate that the venture capital's investment alleviate the problem of information asymmetry, and it is a valid signal for market participants. The result means the role of venture capital seems to be important when companies are listed on the KOSDAQ. (2) The largest shareholder's stake has an inverted-U shape relationship with listing success. In other words, the ownership concentration mitigates moral hazard problem, which leads to listing success. However, if the ownership concentration exceeds a certain level, the chances of success in listing will decrease due to concerns over the pursuit of private interests. The result suggests that the largest shareholder's stake reduce agency problem. This study academically contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the ownership structure affects IPOs, and explaining the results based on agent theory and signal theory. Our results provide practical implications for companies preparing for an IPO on the KOSDAQ.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2020

Using 8,499 observations from 5 years-1,878 firms panel data during 2014 to 2018 in Korean stock exchanges, this study examines the impact of National Pension's ownership on corporate philanthropic giving. The empirical study finds that National Pension's ownership has positive relations with the extent of corporate philanthropic giving in terms of the amounts per employee, the expenditures with respect to total asset and total sales, implying that National Pension plays a monitoring role in promoting target firms to increase the extent of corporate philanthropic giving, which lead to increase in target firms' long-term values. The empirical study also finds that when National Pension is a blockholder holding more than 5% ownership in the target firms, it has positive relations with the extent of corporate philanthropic giving in terms of the amounts per employee, the expenditures with respect to total asset, implying that it exercises disciplinary roles on focal firms in promoting the extent of corporate philanthropic giving in order to increase target firms' long-term values. The results overall support that National Pension plays positive effects on target firms in promoting the extent of corporate philanthropic giving, which lead to increase in target firms' long-term values.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.99-110
• /
• 1991

본 논문은 최근 미국에서 성행되고 있는 기업합병(企業合倂)과 기업비공개화(企業非公開化)와 같은 기업재구성(企業再構成)의 동기를 대리인(代理人) 문제(間題)의 관점에서 설명하는데 그 목적이 있다. 기업합병의 경우, 취득기업의 내부자지분율(內部者持分率)이 높을수록 주주의 부(富)는 합병을 통해 증가하는 반면 내부자지분율이 낮은 기업은 합병을 통해 기존 주주의 부(富)는 오히려 감소한다. 이러한 현상은 소유경영자지분(所有經營者持分)이 낮을 수록 대리인비용이 크게 발생한다는 이론과 일관성(一貫性)이 있음을 알 수 있다. 또한 피취득기업의 주식가격은 합병정보가 공시 되기 이전 몇개월동안 크게 하락하였으나 합병 공시와 동시에 크게 상승하는 현상을 나타낸다. 그 이유는 대리인문제(代理人問題)로 설명 할 수 있다. 피취득기업의 경영자는 기업자원을 비효율적으로 운용할 것(지분(持分)의 대리인비용(代理人費用))이므로 합병공시전 주가는 하락하지만, 합병공시후에는 이러한 대리인문제가 개선될 것이므로 주가가 상승한다는 것이다. 따라서 합병의 경우, 취득기업과 비취득기업 모두 대리인문제(代理人問題)와 관련을 갖는다. 또한 1980년 이후 공개기업(公開企業)의 경영자가 자기회사 주식을 매입한 후 비공개기업(非公開企業으)로 환원(還元)다하는 현상이 유행하고 있다. 비공개기업으로 환원한 기업의 경영자는 창의적 기업활동을 통하여 기업가치를 증대시킨 후 다시 발행시장에서 신주를 발행하여 상당한 이익을 얻고 있다. 이는 공개기업으로 존속하는 경우 낮은 내부자지분율로 인해 대리인문제가 발생하므로 비공개 기업으로 전환함으로써 대리인 비용을 자기주식 취득을 통해 절감시킬 수 있는 증거로 간주된다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.12 no.12
• /
• pp.5558-5563
• /
• 2011

Using longitudinal data of 108 firms in large business conglomerates from 2001 to 2009, this study examines the impact of controlling shareholders' control-ownership disparity on R&D investment. The study finds that control-ownership disparity is negatively related to R&D intensity. This empirical result suggests that controlling shareholders' control rights in excess of ownership rights incent controlling shareholders' expropriation for their private interests, leading to decreased R&D investment which enhances firm value in the long term.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.9
• /
• pp.446-453
• /
• 2018

This study analyzed the effect of related party transactions on the corporate value of Korean firms using panel data regression analysis. We tested the efficient transaction hypothesis and conflict of interests hypothesis which concern related party transactions. Five types of related party transactions were considered, including long term supply contracts, assets and business transfers, affiliate loans, equity investment, and credit offerings. If related party transactions were conducted for the purpose of enhancing corporate efficiency, results would have a positive effect on firm value. If related party transactions were conducted for the purpose of private profits of the controlling shareholders, the results would show a negative effect on firm value. Results were as follows. Firstly, it is confirmed that affiliate loans, equity investment, and credit offerings had negative effects on firm value. This implies that these types of related party transactions used by controlling shareholders for the purpose of their private profit, which supports the conflict of interests hypothesis. Secondly, it was found that long term supply contracts and assets and business transfers had no effect on firm value.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.41-60
• /
• 2015

This paper investigates whether managerial ownership and foreign ownership have impacts on firm value, using a sample of logistics firms listed on the Korea Stock Exchange between 2008 and 2014. In the Korean economy, family-controlled business groups, known as chaebol, constitute a unique governance system. To acquire investments from controlling shareholders, a logistics firm is likely to be included in family-controlled business groups. Since reform of the governance structure of logistics firms in the South Korea enables shareholder value to be maximized, we analyzed ownership effects on firm value using pooled ordinary least squares. Empirical results showed that there was a significant positive relation between managerial ownership and firm value. This study also found that there was a significant positive relation between foreign ownership and firm value. We thus show that both managerial ownership and foreign ownership can protect shareholders by positively affecting firm values.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.12 no.7
• /
• pp.3062-3071
• /
• 2011

This study proposed to compare the performance differences between a manufacturing company and a construction company in accordance with the mutual relations and ownership structures with the management performance based on the increase or decrease of the large shareholders' share-holding ratio (insider ownership, foreign share-holding, institutional investors' share-holding) of a KOSPI listed company in Korea during 10 years(1998-2007). To sum up the research work, first, the increase of foreign share-holding supported the results of previous studies which foreign share-holding has a positive effect on the long term performance by having a positive(+) effect on MTB, and the increase of an insider ownership supported the management entrenchment hypothesis of previous studies by having a negative(-) effect on MTB. However, relations between institutional investors's share-holding and MTB could not find out linkages in spite of the results of previous studies where dealt with the active monitoring hypothesis. Also, to examine the linkages of ROA and the ownership structure, though the increases of foreign share-holding and insider ownership had a positive(+) effect on ROA, the increases of institutional investors' share-holding had a negative(-) effect on it. It showed different analysis results from the active monitoring hypothesis of institutional investors. As a result of verifying whether there is "any difference in the management performances between the construction industry and the manufacturing industry according to the equity structure" which is the second hypothesis, nothing of the insider ownership and whether or not there is the construction industry, foreign share-holding and whether or not there is the construction, and the institutional ownership and whether or not there is the construction industry gave a statistical difference to MTB and ROA. Accordingly, it was possible to find out there is no difference in the management performance between the construction industry and the manufacturing industry based on the ownership structure in spite of different characteristics from the manufacturing industry such as the revenue recognition in ordering, production and accounting.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio and the business diversification of savings banks The difference in this study is the analysis of the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio of the savings bank and the business diversification using panel data. In this study, the semi-annual financial statements for the period 2014-2018 were used on the basis of a sample of 79 saving banks. The research model is analyzed using random effects generalized linear square (GLS) model considering the autocorrelation problem. As a result of the empirical analysis, it is estimated that the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio of the savings bank and the business diversification is significant (+). This is the result of supporting the hedging hypothesis.