• Title/Summary/Keyword: 주거비과부담

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

The Determinants of Housing Affordability (주거비 과부담 결정요인)

  • Lim, Se Hee
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.68 no.3
    • /
    • pp.29-50
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study examined the determinants of housing affordability using the 2014 fact-finding survey of housing. This study identified the effects of characters of districts as well as the effects of characters of family and housing, taking advantage of HGLM(Hierarchical General Linear Model). The results of this study showed that male householder, higher education level, the monthly housing, higher satisfaction of environment of housing are the factors that increased the odds of living at unaffordable housing, but higher income, public transfer recipient, living at sub-standard housing, the Jensei housing are the factors that decreased the odds of living at unaffordable housing. And the higher housing price, the higher rent of the districts increased significantly the odds of living at unaffordable housing, but the higher rate of public housing of the districts decreased the odds of living at unaffordable housing. This study provides the basis that the price of housing and rent should be controled and the policy of public housing should be expanded for housing welfare.

  • PDF

The Difference of Housing Welfare Outcomes Between Public Rental Housing and Market Rental Housing (공공임대주택과 민간임대주택의 주거복지 성과 차이)

  • Lim, Se-Hee
    • 한국사회정책
    • /
    • v.25 no.3
    • /
    • pp.75-101
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of the study was to examine the difference of housing welfare outcomes between public rental housing and market rental housing. Housing welfare is defined as living at adequate, affordable housing with stability and measured as substandard housing, unaffordable housing, unstable housing. This study was based on 2016 Housing Fact Finding Survey, sampled the households which their incomes are below 120% average income of city workers. This study controlled the socio-economic characters of householders to identify the difference of housing welfare performance between public and market rental housing. The study showed the ratios of public rental housing of substandard housing and unaffordable housing are not low. But It is revealed that the achievements of housing welfare of the public rental housing are better than market rental housing and the differences between them are more consistent after controlling the socio-economic characters of householders. The problems of substandard housing, unaffordable housing and unstable housing in market rental housing are more than public rental housing. This study provides the basis that the regulation for market tenant protection should be reinforced and the policy of public housing should be expanded and improved for housing welfare.

The Difference of Characters between Housing Poverty Types - Subcriterion Criteria of Substandard Housing, Unaffordable Housing and Double Housing Poverty (유형별 주거빈곤가구의 차이 - 최저주거기준 하위기준미달, 주거비 과부담, 중복주거빈곤가구)

  • Lim, Se hee;Park, Kyung ha
    • 한국사회정책
    • /
    • v.24 no.4
    • /
    • pp.31-62
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study intends to identify the difference of socio-economic characters and housing welfare needs between housing poverty types and to know the independent effects of variables on the housing poverty types. It was revealed that the double housing poverty household, housing below facility standard, unaffordable housing with low income, housing below structure performance environment standard, housing below area standard and housing below room standard should be supported one by one. And the variables related with the housing poverty types are different Suggestions were made for housing welfare policy for the double housing poverty, the control for rental housing market, the policy considering income level for unaffordable housing, the housing policy for the disable household.

Home Energy Cost and Housing Cost Burden of Urban Monthly Renter Households in Korea and the United States (한국과 미국 도시 월세가구의 가정 에너지 비용과 주거비 부담)

  • Lee, Hyun-Jeong
    • Korean Journal of Human Ecology
    • /
    • v.21 no.3
    • /
    • pp.611-628
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study was to examine influence of home energy cost on housing cost burden of Korean and U.S. monthly renter households in urban areas and to explore influences of household and housing characteristics on their home energy cost burden. Microdata for this research was extracted from the 2011 Korean Household Budget Survey and 2009 American Housing Survey. Monthly renter households in urban areas were initially grouped based on household income, followed by a detailed analysis of housing and home energy cost. Findings are as follows: (1) The maximum ratio of home energy cost to household house hold income in Korea was 49% compared to 83% in the US; (2) Energy cost to income ratio were found to have significant influences on housing cost burden and lower income households' housing cost burden was found more vulnerable to their energy cost; (3) In general, the energy cost burden of low-income renter households in Korea tended to be influenced by household size, the number of household members staying at home during daytime hours and housing unit size. The energy cost burden of low-income renter households in the U.S. tended to be influenced by home structure type, size and age, the householder's age, race, educational attainment, the household size, number of wage earners per household, income, and the number of household members between 7 and 17 years of age.

Changes in Physical and Mental Health as a Function of Substandard Housing Conditions and Unaffordable Housing (주거빈곤이 건강에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단연구)

  • Park, Jungmin;Heo, Yongchang;Oh, Ukchan;Yoon, Sookyung
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.67 no.2
    • /
    • pp.137-159
    • /
    • 2015
  • This longitudinal study examined the influence of substandard housing conditions and housing affordability on physical and mental health. Using data from the Korea Welfare Panel Study, this study followed 8,583 adults who continued to participate in the survey from 2009 to 2013. Multivariate analyses involved linear and logistic regression models with the hybrid method that incorporates both fixed and random effects. Results show that substandard housing conditions and excess housing cost burden had significant adverse effects on adults' mental health (e.g., depressive symptoms). About one fourth of the entire sample and one third of those in poverty reported having lived in substandard housing conditions. Additionally, nearly one fourth of those in poverty reported having experienced excess housing cost burden, which is 4 times greater than that of the entire sample. Our findings show that a substantial proportion of individuals, particularly among the poor, have a difficulty in accessing to decent, affordable housing, and that housing assistance may have additional benefits of improving the mental health of individuals with housing issues.

  • PDF

A Study on Housing Situation and Residential Satisfaction of Foreigners in Korea -Focusing on Seoul and Kyonggi Province- (재한외국인의 주거실태 및 주거만족도에 관한 연구 -서울, 경기 지역을 중심으로-)

  • Kim, Young-Joo;Bo, Tong
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.574-586
    • /
    • 2019
  • The purpose of this study was to investigate housing situation and residential satisfaction of foreigners in Korea, and to identify influential factors for housing satisfaction. A questionnaire survey was conducted to 132 foreigners who reside in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. Most of the respondents were Chinese and the average age was 45.7. Over 90% of the respondents lived in a rented house and detached house was the most popular type of house. Overall score of residential satisfaction was 3.43 and it was above average. However, scores for parking lot, housing deterioration, and space planning showed the lowest level of satisfaction. Factor analysis was used to summarize the variables related to residential satisfaction and 5 factors -'space planning and organization,' 'amenities & equipment', 'community facilities,' 'near environment' and 'housing expenses'- were drawn. Among those, 'space planning and organization' was the most influential factor to residential satisfaction as the result of multiple regression analysis.