• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.893-897
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 아이스하버 형태의 어도를 조립식으로 개발하여 실제 현장에 적용하기에 앞서 유량 변화에 따라 어도내 유속 및 유황변화를 조사하고 어도의 배열을 조정하여 어도의 현장적용성을 검토하기 위하여 실시하였다. 모형 월류수심이 40cm(현장 20cm)일 때 상류부는 어류가 소상하기에 적합한 유속을 나타내었고 하류부의 가장 낮은 월류부(좌측열)에서는 어류 소상에 다소 지장을 주는 유속변화를 보였다. 그러나 좌측열을 제외한 우측열과 중간열에서는 어류 이동 및 소상에 적절한 유속변화를 나타내고 있는 것으로 보아 본 어도는 유량 증가에 따라 월류 유속이 증가하여도 월류벽이 높은 구간에서는 유속이 증가폭이 크지 않기 때문에 수위변화에 대응력을 가지는 것으로 판단된다. 다양한 배열로 어도를 설치하면 유속이 느린 어도 구간은 어도 유인수로로서의 역할을 할 수 있으므로 어도내의 다양한 유속은 어류 소상에 유리하게 작용한 것으로 평가된다. 어도의 배열은 월류부의 높이가 높은 것을 좌${\cdot}$우측열에 배열하고 낮은 것을 중간열에 배열하면 갈수량에 대한 대응력이 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 잠공은 하천의 유량 조건이 좋을 때보다 갈수기나 홍수기에 어류가 소상하는 통로의 역할을 할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. 따라서, 본 어도는 다양한 월류벽의 배열로 하천의 수위변화에 대한 대응력을 가지고 있으며 구조적으로 견고하여 우리나라 하천 상황에 적절한 어도로 판단된다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.32 no.4A
• /
• pp.207-215
• /
• 2012

Structural behavior of built-up compression members with unsymmetric connectors under buckling status has been studied through these experiments. When the distance between adjacent H-300 beams of built-up compression member is 2 m in length, and the H-300 beams are lengthened up to 30 m in length with three-10 m-H-beams by bolts and double arrayed, three specimen having each connector interval 4 m, 5 m, 6 m are experimented for evaluating buckling loads. The buckling loads from the experiments are compared with buckling loads of structural analysis using FEM and buckling loads of Timoshenko Eq. loads in order to figure out how the connectors' interval affects on longitudinal and lateral displacements, also strain of the built-up compression members as well. The result shows that the buckling loads tend to sharply decrease non-linearly according to connectors' interval increases. As well as that, the differences between experimental buckling loads and theoretical buckling loads and between experimental buckling loads and structural analyses buckling loads also have a tendency to be increased as the connector interval increases.

• Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.104-111
• /
• 2016

The steel frame modular housing of which the research and development has been actively carried out recently cannot be constructed through monolithic placement like the reinforced concrete deck of general structure due to the characteristics of construction method of production in the factory and assembly on the site. And floor vertical vibration and deflection caused by inhabitants' activities may become an important issue in the aspect of usability evaluation due to a decrease in the section size of member, a decrease in weight, and so on. Therefore, this study evaluated the vibration performance of deck by using formula of AISC Design Guide 11(hereinafter AISC formula) which was practically used in general for modules where a stud was and wasn't installed at the center of beam in the longitudinal direction in the modular housing to be studied, and examined the applicability of AISC formula through comparison with the results of analysis using a general-purpose analysis program. On the basis of this, a structural cause for an error to occur between analysis result and AISC formula in the deck of module in which a stud was installed was analysed, and measures for considering this were suggested. Besides, an analysis model with the variables of measures for improving the floor vibration performance of modular housing to be studied was established. And measures having excellent vibration performance and economic feasibility were suggested through vibration response analysis and economic evaluation.

• 지반과기술
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.65-67
• /
• 2005

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.17-25
• /
• 2010

• Korean Architects
• /
• v.3 no.5 s.5
• /
• pp.39-44
• /
• 1968

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.57-59
• /
• 2000

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.67
• /
• pp.114-115
• /
• 1998

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.31-34
• /
• 1991

• Korean Architects
• /
• v.5 no.12 s.28
• /
• pp.56-57
• /
• 1970