• Title/Summary/Keyword: 조경유산

Search Result 221, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

A Study on the System Improvement of Registered Cultural Properties for the Preservation of Modern and Contemporary Landscape Heritage (근현대 조경유산 보존을 위한 등록문화재 제도개선 방안 연구)

  • KWON Yeji;KIM Minseon;KIM Choongsik
    • Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
    • /
    • v.56 no.2
    • /
    • pp.282-294
    • /
    • 2023

  • Efforts are being made internationally to pay attention to the landscape value of modern and contemporary heritage and to pass it on. However, in Korea, the registration of modern and contemporary landscape heritage as registered cultural properties is insignificant. There has also been little discussion on ways to improve the system in this regard. This study sought ways to improve the registration criteria and classification system of the registered cultural property system so that modern and contemporary landscaping heritage could be protected. Currently, the registration criteria for registered cultural properties are not stipulated for each type of heritage, but are stipulated as a single comprehensive standard. Registration criteria should be separately prepared so that the landscape value of the heritage can be reviewed. First, the registration criteria have an important value in understanding the development of landscape culture. Second, well-preserved landscaping reflects or characterizes the times. Lastly, it should be defined as related to the works of major artists or important figures or historical events. The classification system must match the studied building cultural property classification system, and the detailed types of modern and contemporary landscape heritage should be specified. The major classification follows the building cultural property classification system, but parks and green spaces, squares, and gardens, which can be called a single landscape heritage, should be added to the middle classification. Landscaping heritage, such as gardens combined with building heritage, shall be specified in the subcategory based on building use.

  • https://doi.org/10.22755/kjchs.2023.56.2.282 인용 PDF

A Study on the Case of Designation and Protection System of Modern and Contemporary Landscape Heritage in Germany (독일의 근현대 조경유산 보호제도와 지정사례 연구)

  • Kim, Min-Seon;Kim, Choong-Sik
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.42 no.3
    • /
    • pp.51-60
    • /
    • 2024

  • Currently, Korea lacks an institutional framework needed to safeguard modern and contemporary landscape heritage. The value of landscapes is merely recorded as the surrounding environment of architectural heritage. On the other hand, attention has been drawn to Germany's approach, particularly in Berlin, where the outdoor spaces of buildings within housing estates listed as World Cultural Heritage are designated and protected as 'garden monuments.' This research seeks to explore Germany's relevant policies to glean insights that could be beneficial. Germany has established clear regulations to protect landscape heritages such as parks, squares, street trees, cemeteries, and cityscapes as monuments worthy of preservation. According to an analysis of the heritage listings available on German government websites, the designated types of modern and contemporary landscape heritage encompass a wide range of facilities including residential facilities, squares, parks, public facilities, cultural venues, educational facilities, healthcare facilities, religious facilities, war memorials, and industrial facilities. This aligns with the designated purposes outlined within the building classification system used for registered cultural heritage in Korea. While Korea continues to prioritize the protection of structures, Germany adopts a more nuanced approach by separately identifying and equally safeguarding buildings, their surrounding spaces, and gardens. In defining areas for landscape heritage, a clear distinction was made from those designated for architectural monuments. Even within the same area, landscape heritages are further subdivided and specified according to variations in style, unique features, or their value for preservation. This research is anticipated to serve as a valuable foundational data for identifying and safeguarding modern and contemporary landscape heritage within Korea.

  • https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2024.42.3.051 인용 PDF

Implications of the Transition into National Heritage System and the Enactment of Traditional Landscape Architecture (국가유산 체계전환 및 전통조경 법제화의 함의)

  • Hwang, Kwon-Soon
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.41 no.3
    • /
    • pp.1-12
    • /
    • 2023

  • After 60 years since the enactment of the cultural property protection act, Korea's national system of protecting what has been valued has been transformed into a 'National Heritage System'. To meet the new system, the classification of national heritage has been re-classified into three categories as cultural heritage, natural heritage, and intangible heritage. In accordance with the sub-classification, acts for cultural heritage act and intangible heritage has been amended and act for natural heritage has been enacted. Act for natural heritage defines natural heritage as natural objects or cultural heritage formed through the interaction between human beings and natural environment. The sub-classification are categorized as follows; animal, plant, geological and natural reserves, natural landscapes, historical-cultural landscapes, and mixed landscapes. It also allows creating traditional landscapes so that traditional way of landscaping can be encouraged and integrated with modern life within historic environment. In line with the new concept of traditional landscaping, existing practices will be also needed to be changed. Traditional landscaping will play a significant role in setting out the new administrative paradigm which focuses on more value preservation. This paper recommends that effective collaboration between government, experts of traditional landscaping, and owners should be established to integrate the new policy in practice.

  • https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2023.41.3.001 인용 PDF