• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.37 no.5
• /
• pp.90-97
• /
• 2009

Sedum takesimenses among the Korean Native Genus Sedum was selected as evergreen ground covers during winter in the central districts of Korea. In order to obtain basic information for production as a pot flower with good quality, the effects of pinching frequencies on growth and flowering of S. takesimense were investigated. S. takesimense plant height became much shorter and numbers of lateral shoots were increased with increased pinching. Shoots of S. takesimense treated with 30% pinching during 2004 and 2005 showed greater length and less number of lateral shoots than those with 60% pinching. Leaves of S. takesimense treated with 70% shading showed a dark green color and had a longer shoot length and a lower number of shoots than cultivation under full sunlight. Therefore, Korean native S. takesimense will be utilized as ground cover treated with 70% shading or under a tree. Therefore, S. takesimense will be promising as ground cover materials in the central districts of Korea.

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.116
• /
• pp.37-41
• /
• 2010

너도밤나무속(Fagus) 식물은 우리에게 다소 낯설게 느껴지지만 북반구지역에 넓게 분포하며 세계 여러 나라에서 많이 사랑받고 있는 대표적인 조경수이다. 한편 우리나라에서는 울릉도에서 자생하는 너도밤나무를 제외하고는 조경적인 이용이 거의 없는 실정이다. 속명인 Fagus는 그리스어 phagein(먹는다)에서 유래된 라틴명으로 열매를 식용한다는 뜻에서 유래되었다.

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.112
• /
• pp.12-14
• /
• 2009

'천남성' 원래 약용식물이지만 잎의 질감이 좋고 꽃모양이 특이하여 분화 및 화단용으로 흔히 이용될 만큼 유명한 식물이다. 잎이나, 열매, 특히 뿌리에 독성이 많은 유독식물이라 이용 시는 상당한 주의가 필요하다. 두루미천남성, 점박이천남성, 큰천남성 등 몇가지가 우리나라에 나며 천남성은 전국의 그늘 또는 반 그늘진 산에 흔히 자생한다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1990

Forty different apartment houses were subjected to assess the status of indoor - landscaping plants found at each apartment house in Seoul for the year of 1986 and 7989. 1. Comparing with those of 1986, 46% increase in total indoor plant species and 68% increase in the number of them were observed. The most abundant sort found in 1786 was oriental orchid, African violet, Scindapsus, cacti, and Clivia, and in 1989, first with oriental orchid, cacti, Chlorophytum, Clivia and Dracaena, in that order. 2. Foliage ornamental plants were mast popularly found in both years of 1986 and 1989 when considered for horticultural classification of plants. 3. Average plant height ranged between 15 to 30 cm in the year of i986, whereas 31 to 80 cm in 1987, indicaling that the size of plants has greatly increased. 4. Kind of planters or containers was most frequently shown to be made of plastic material in both years, and the porcelain ones have significantly been increased to use recently. 5. Most indoor plants placed at the rooms were on the floor in those years, yet the use of planting shelves became particularly manifesting in the year of 1989. 6. Fittonia and cacti were the most frequently used plant materials for installing terrariums at apartment rooms In the year of 1986, whereas Adiantum and Maranta were so in 1989, indicating that the growers choose much adaptable species in apartment environments. Most of the plants grown to landscaping the indoors was apartment verandas in those years. 8. Average number of indoor plants possessed at each apartment houses surveyed for the year of 1986 was 16 different ones, whereas 27 each In 1789, shoving a noteworthy increase in the number. 9. There have been apparent increase and improvement inhabitant's indoor - plant interest in the years to pass and probably to come.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.114-123
• /
• 2009

To investigate the possible use of plants for landscaping in reclaimed soil, a planting pilot system experiment was performed over the course of four years in reclaimed dredging area with four species: Alnus firma, Alnus hirsuta, Pinus thunbergii, and Pyrachantha angustifolia for 4 years. The physicochemical characteristics of the tested soil showed that it was sandy through coming from a reclaimed dredging area. The average pH of the tested soil was 7.16(slight alkali), and electric conductivity(EC) was relatively low, $294{\mu}S/cm$, even though it came from a saltwater area. To test the effect of planting density vs. phytomass by plant specie from a planting basin, the experiment was designed using four plant species with high and low planting densities over 4 years. The planting conditions of the growth of landscape tree species exhibited growth height as follows: A. hirsuta, A. firma, P. thunbergii, and P. angustifolia, whill the DBH followed the order of A. hirsuta, A. firma, and P. thunbergii. The total phytomass of each plant was higher at low density planting areas than high density planting area in terms of total phytomass production and growth distribution in the reclaimed dredging area. Total phytomass per unit area increased as follows: A. hirsuta, A. firma, P. thunbergii, and P. angustifolia. The total phytomass per each tested plant was 2 times higher in low density planting areas than high density planting areas. Total phytomass per unit area, however, was similar or slighty higher in high density planting areas compared to low density areas. Among the tested plants, A. hirsuta showed the highest phytomass, implying that A. hirsuta adapted very well to the reclaimed area and has the capability of a fast growth, nitrogen fixation tree, and utilizing insoluble nutrients through inoculated root nodule bacteria. The yield of phytomass per individual in low density Alnus species was greater than that of the high density. However, those per unit areas had no difference in the density-dependent planting. The ratio of belowground to aboveground was $0.21{\sim}0.26$. Thus, it could be concluded that the Alnus species are potential candidates for ornamental tree species in reclaimed dredging areas. This study offers baseline data for the use of ornamental tree species in reclaimed dredging areas. Additional research is required for different ornamental species in order to increase phytomass of a planting conditions based on reclaimed dredging areas.

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• v.82 no.9_10
• /
• pp.26-28
• /
• 2004

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.118
• /
• pp.22-24
• /
• 2010

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.114
• /
• pp.28-29
• /
• 2010

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.123
• /
• pp.33-36
• /
• 2011

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.115
• /
• pp.30-31
• /
• 2010