• Product Safety
• /
• s.215
• /
• pp.58-59
• /
• 2011

• Journal of the HCI Society of Korea
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.17-20
• /
• 2011

The contingency theory of leadership was proposed by F. Fiedler. In his theory, he divided the group into Task oriented and Relationship-oriented people based on work-style by LPC(Least Preffered Co-workers) test. This survey searches significance of interaction usage depending on which group has more aggressive interaction on the address list with mobile phones focusing on the differences between mainfunctions (name, cell phone, group name) and sub-functions (birthday, Photo, E-mail). Itis the hypothesis that the relationship-oriented group has more interaction than the task-oriented group which was identified through the analyzed usage of the address list. Results show that the contingency theory was not appropriately related with the research. Interaction usage by the following task based on Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership isn't related much. However, by discovering the interesting patterns by the test, this research is able to guide human-centered address design directions.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.48-66
• /
• 2001

1990년대에 들어서야 개인 컴퓨터 시장에 적극적으로 참여하기 시작한 삼성전자는 반도체, CRT 등의 관련 기술에 대한 노하우와 가전 시장에서의 마케팅 경험을 토대로 1994년 시장 선두업체인 삼보컴퓨터를 제치고 시장 점유율 1위로 올라섰다. 1997년의 외환위기로 인하여 수요가 극도로 위축되고 동시에 환율 급등으로 인한 원가 상승요인 등으로 인하여 개인 컴퓨터시장은 매우 어려운 상황을 맞게 되었다. 이러한 상황하에서 삼보 등 업계의 주요 경쟁업체들은 "체인지업" 과 같은 저마다의 독특한 제품 및 마케팅 전략을 수립하면서 시장확보에 노력을 기울여왔다. 본 사례에서는 매직스테이션이라는 브랜드를 이용하여 개인 컴퓨터 시장에서의 선두 위치를 고수하려는 삼성전자의 전략을 살펴본다. 특히 각 세분시장의 특성을 토대로 제품, 가격, 유통, 광고 및 판매촉진 등의 마케팅 믹스 요소들 간의 시너지를 극대화하려는 삼성전자의 통합 마케팅 커뮤니케이션(Integrated Marketing Communication; IMC) 전략을 분석하고 향후 이 시장에서의 전략적 과제를 제시한다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.167-175
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this paper is a study of the next generation innovation to deal with changing business environment in which the competition is getting fierce. The ultimate goal of a company is to sustain and grow by creating value or profit continuously. As the social or business environment changes, the way of creating profits also changes. Therefore, business management or innovation should be evolved in accordance with the value change, and this gives basis to the question "What would the next generation innovation be like?". This paper is not to give the definite answer to the next generation innovation, but to get discussion started. We hope that many ideas, critiques and opinions to this paper will make the next generation innovation clear.