• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.83-107
• /
• 2006

We share the critical mind about the decolonization of Library & Information Science(LIS) and Political Science in Korea. We did a bibliographical study on the decolonization discourse in the Political Science of Korea. Concretely, we traced the decolonization discourse of the scholars of the Political Science in Korea, and wrote their abstracts. Finally, this study provided the general view of their decolonization discourse. This study covers the decolonization discourse from 1945 to 2005. This bibliographical review may show the possibility of communication between LIS and social sciences in Korea, and can support the development of the decolonization discourse in the Political Science of Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science Conference
• /
• 2010.05b
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2010

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.138
• /
• pp.10-10
• /
• 1993

국제정치의 논리와 구조, 한국외교정책의 현황.전망을 다루고 있는 이 책들은 외교정책 결정 과정에서의 내적요인에 대한 분석의 결여라는 한국 국제정치학의 한계를 극복한 것으로 평가된다. 국제정치학 주요이론을 소개.평가하고 구체분석도 행함으로써 이론과 실제를 잘 조망하고 있다.

• Korea and Global Affairs
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.243-270
• /
• 2017

The purposes of this paper are twofold: First, to discuss ways and limits of studying politics scientifically; second, to examine group theories to the study of political science. To answer the first question, I examine philosophy of science, methods of scientific research, and limits of scientific study of politics. As a subject matter itself, political science involves the study of human beings and the discovery of explanations for the political behavior that they exhibit. This discovery of regularities of behavior in politics inevitably requires that human beings act consistently or discoverable manner. I argue that the best way of studying politics as much as possible is to combine traditional and scientific approaches depending upon issues, The second section of this paper will examine one of important middle-range theory of politics; group theories (approaches). Examining this will show strength and limits of studying politics scientifically. The group approaches examine the importance of role that people hold in the political system as well as the relationship between the action of collective group and its impact on the political behavior. Overall, the group approaches tend to deal with individuals in specific societal contexts and with varying distributions of power between the actors. This group approaches are premised on the belief that political activity involves more than just one individual, political activity occurs instead through individual actors in particular settings. I argued that group theories have some explanatory power and descriptive richness, though it has limitations.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.40
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 1989

• 대학교육
• /
• s.10
• /
• pp.109-114
• /
• 1984

• 대학교육
• /
• s.55
• /
• pp.44-50
• /
• 1992

• The Korean Nurse
• /
• v.16 no.3 s.89
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 1977

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.87
• /
• pp.14-15
• /
• 1991

• Atmosphere
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.11-12
• /
• 2001