• Title/Summary/Keyword: 정서표출 규칙

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Emotion Regulation as a Predictor of Aggression and Peer Relationships in School-Age Children (아동의 정서조절 능력과 공격성 및 또래관계의 질)

  • Han, Eugene
    • Korean Journal of Child Studies
    • /
    • v.26 no.4
    • /
    • pp.85-100
    • /
    • 2005
  • The 299(162 female and 137 male) participants in this study listened to six stories designed to elicit prosocial or self-protective rules. The Aggression Scale is composed of verbal and physical aggression and expression of anger. The Quality of Peer Relationships scale has both positive and negative components. Results showed girls used more appropriate emotional regulation strategies for managing negative emotions and more prosocial motives than boys. In the regression analysis emotional display rules and gender positive strategies accounted for 6%, 9%, and 5% of the variance in verbal aggression, physical aggression and anger expression of anger. Children with prosocial motives for emotional regulation and many strategies showed lower levels of egocentricity and peer rejection.

  • PDF

Parental Emotion Regulation and Children's Understanding of Emotional Display Rules (부모의 정서 규제와 아동의 정서 표출 규칙 이해)

  • 한유진
    • Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
    • /
    • v.36 no.11
    • /
    • pp.61-72
    • /
    • 1998
  • The purpose of this study was to investigate parental emotion regulation and children's understanding of emotional display rules. 31 boys and 29 girls of the first and fourth grades and their parents were selected for the subject. Sixty children were interviewed on eight interpersonal conflict situations and parent completed the PACES(Saarni, 1985) separately. The main results of this study were as follows. 1) Children's understanding of emotional display rules increased with age. 2) Children's primary justification for using emotional display rules was self-protective one. Girls used more often prosocial justification than boys. 3) Parental emotion regulation was significantly different between the two contexts: a child might cause another person substantial emotional distress and a child didn't cause another person substantial emotional distress. 4) Parental regulation was differed by children's age in the context that the child might cause another person substantial emotional distress. 5) Father's regulation was differed by children's sex in the context that the child might cause another person substantial emotional distress. 6) Maternal regulation was positively correlated to the level of emotional display rules in the context that the child might cause another person substantial emotional distress.

  • PDF