• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.271-299
• /
• 1999

지난 1981년부터 해외석유개발사업이 시작된 이래 지금까지의 총투자비 약 24억 달러 중 에너지특별회계에 의한 정부지원금은 약 6억 달러로 전체 투자비의 25%를 차지한다. 이와 같은 정부지원에도 불구하고 1997년도의 개발수입량은 13.6백만 배럴로 국내 원유소비량의 1.6%에 불과한 실정이다. 2010년까지 국내 소요원유의 10%를 자주개발 원유로 공급한다는 정책목표를 설정한 정부는 최근 IMF사태와 구조조정 여파로 기업들이 해외석유개발사업에 대한 투자 우선순위를 낮추고 있다고 판단하고, 에너지 안보차원에서 석유를 안정적으로 확보하기 위해 지원방안을 모색중인 것으로 알려져 있다. 본 연구는 현행 성공불 융자의 사전적(事前的) 지원제도 대신 국내기업이 해외석유개발사업에 진출해 그 결과 국내에 도입하는 개발원유에 대해 단위당 일정금액을 지원하는 사후적(事後的) 지원제도를 대안(代案)으로 선택해, 이 제도하에서 개발수입률의 크기를 측정할 수 있는 수리적 모형을 설정하고, 이의 실증분석을 통해 개발수입목표율에 따른 정부지원금의 크기를 추정하여 제시하고 있다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.141-174
• /
• 2011

This paper presents the results of a meta-regression analysis on econometric evidence concerning the relationship between public funding of R&D and private R&D expenditure by reviewing literature and synthesizing existing results. The analysis on the effects of public financing on private investments in R&D has been the object of numerous studies, none of which having arrived at definite conclusion. A meta-analysis based upon a data-base including all relevant studies was carried out to examine whether the characteristics of the applied analysis influence the results. Three different empirical results are presented.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2013.10a
• /
• pp.168-180
• /
• 2013

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.155-159
• /
• 2017

연구개발은 일반적으로 많은 투자가 요구되는 반면에 높은 불확실성이 존재한다. 따라서 정부에서 지원받는 제한된 인력과 예산을 기반으로 연구를 수행하는 출연연 입장에서는 연구개발의 효율성을 객관적으로 측정하고, 연구개발 활동에 투입되는 자원과 산출에 대한 체계적인 평가가 중요하다. 즉, 기관에서 운영하는 R&D 예산의 합리적인 배분을 위해서 연구개발 성과의 효율성을 측정하고 이를 다시 전략적으로 R&D 기획에 반영하는 피드백 과정이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 건설분야 정부출연연구기관의 연구부서를 대상으로 연구성과 분석을 통한 효율성을 측정하고자 한다. 이를 통해 제한된 인력과 R&D 연구비용의 합리적인 투자를 위한 전략적 우선순위 선정, 기관의 중장기 발전계획, 경영목표 등에 부합하는 연구과제를 수행하기 위한 정책 및 R&D 기획의 시사점을 제공하고자 한다.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.29 no.1 s.320
• /
• pp.43-59
• /
• 1996

국민소득 1만달러시대를 구가하는 96년도의 정부 전처의 연구개발예산은 2조3천7백95억원으로 전년보다 24.9%, 4천7백45억원이 증가하였다. 다가오는 21세기에 우리나라가 세계 속의 중심국가로 부상하기 위하여 정부는 한정된 재원으로 다양한 행정수요에도 불구하고 연구개발투자에 매년 20% 이상씩 증가시켜 집중 배분하여 왔다. 이에따라 총예산중 연구개발예산의 점유율은 95년의 2.56%에서 96년에는 2.79%로 제고되었고, 이는 신경제5개년계획기간중에 국가 총연구개발 투자규모를 국민총생산의 3~4% 수준으로 확대하기 위해 정부가 의욕적으로 선도역할을 충실히 수행하고 있음을 웅변하고 있는 것이라 하겠다. 96년도 새해 정부의 연구개발 관계예산을 부처별로 보면, 규모면에서는 과학기술처가 가장 많은 7천8백41억원으로 전체 R&D예산의 33.0%를 차지하고 있고, 증가율면에서는 교육부가 제일 크게 62.9% 증가한 3천6백49억원 수준이다. R&D 에산의 규모와 운용전망을 좀 더 자세히 살펴보기로 한다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.35
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 1993

국내 건설산업은 국내외의 환경변화에 대응하기 위하여 국내 실정에 적합한 기술의 개발을 통하여 대외 경쟁력을 제고하기 위한 노력이 한창 가속화 되고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 국내 건설산업의 연구개발투자 실태를 분석하고 이를 근거로 국내 실정에 적합한 기술개발체계를 구축하고 각 투자 주체별 적정투자규모를 산정 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. O 국내 건설기술의 연구개발투자 효율성 증대를 위한 정부부문의 기술개발투자 증대 및 종합건설기술개발 사업 제도의 도입$\cdot$실시. O 적정투자규모는 2001년에 하한규모로 19,674억원(GNP 대비 0.33$\%$) 하한규모로는 27,451억원(GNP대비 0.46$\%$)정도로 예측됨. O 민간의 기술개발투자 확대를 유인하기 위해서는 각종 지원제도의 개선과 함께 개발된 기술의 적극적인 활용이 요구됨.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.175-201
• /
• 2014

This paper analyses the effect of R&D investment on local economies. R&D investment contributes to the regional local economy by increasing employment and production activity of the investees. The investees may end up with increased productivity, sales and employment. At the regional R&D level, the central government R&D fund and firm self R&D budget will be the source of R&D investment. Further positive effects are inter-related with local industries. This study carried out an empirical analysis on the effect of R&D investment on local economies using Korean panel data after comparing international literatures. The dynamic panel estimator is used to estimate an autoregressive model with lagged dependent variable. Using the Da Silva method, mixed variance-component moving-average error process is estimated and selected. R&D investment is very important factor to improve the productivity of a region and the size of the effect is dependent on the time periods within the Korean economic history.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.788-818
• /
• 2009

Renewable energy refers to solar energy, biomass energy, hydrogen energy, wind power, fuel cell, coal liquefaction and vaporization, marine energy, waste energy, and liquidity fuel made out of byproduct of geothermal heat, hydrogen and coal; it excludes energy based on coal, oil, nuclear energy and natural gas. Developed countries have recognized the importance of these energies and thus have set the mid to long term plans to develop and commercialize the technology and supported them with drastic political and financial measures. Considering the growing recognition to the field, it is necessary to analysis up-to-now achievement of the government's related projects, in the standards of type of renewable energy, management of sectional goals, and its commercialization. Korean government is chiefly following suit the USA and British policies of developing and distributing renewable energy. However, unlike Japan which is in the lead role in solar rays industry, it still lacks in state-directed support, participation of enterprises and social recognition. The research regarding renewable energy has mainly examinedthe state of supply of each technology and suitability of specific region for applying the technology. The evaluation shows that the research has been focused on supply and demand of renewable as well as general energy and solution for the enhancement of supply capacity in certain area. However, in-depth study for commercialization and the increase of capacity in industry followed by development of the technology is still inadequate. 'Cost-benefit model for each energy source' is used in analysis of technology development of renewable energy and quantitative and macro economical effects of its commercialization in order to foresee following expand in related industries and increase in added value. First, Investment on the renewable energy technology development is in direct proportion both to the product and growth, but product shows slightly higher index under the same amount of R&D investment than growth. It indicates that advance in technology greatly influences the final product, the energy growth. Moreover, while R&D investment on renewable energy product as well as the government funds included in the investment have proportionate influence on the renewable energy growth, private investment in the total amount invested has reciprocal influence. This statistic shows that research and development is mainly driven by government funds rather than private investment. Finally, while R&D investment on renewable energy growth affects proportionately, government funds and private investment shows no direct relations, which indicates that the effects of research and development on renewable energy do not affect government funds or private investment. All of the results signify that although it is important to have government policy in technology development and commercialization, private investment and active participation of enterprises are the key to the success in the industry.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.6 no.1 s.82
• /
• pp.48-61
• /
• 1996

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.1-48
• /
• 2009

Recently we have found some symptoms that R&D fiscal incentives might not work well what it has intended through the analysis of current statistics of firm's R&D data. Firstly, we found that the growth rate of R&D investment in private sector during the recent decade has been slowdown. The average of growth rate (real value) of R&D investment is 7.1% from 1998 to 2005, while it was 13.9% from 1980 to 1997. Secondly, the relative share of R&D investment of SME has been decreased to 21%('05) from 29%('01), even though the tax credit for SME has been more beneficial than large size firm, Thirdly, The R&D expenditure of large size firms (besides 3 leading firms) has not been increased since late of 1990s. We need to find some evidence whether fiscal incentives are effective in increasing firm's R&D investment. To analyse econometric model we use firm level unbalanced panel data for 4 years (from 2002 to 2005) derived from MOST database compiled from the annual survey, "Report on the Survey of Research and Development in Science and Technology". Also we use fixed effect model (Hausman test results accept fixed effect model with 1% of significant level) and estimate the model for all firms, large firms and SME respectively. We have following results from the analysis of econometric model. For large firm: i ) R&D investment responds elastically (1.20) to sales volume. ii) government R&D subsidy induces R&D investment (0.03) not so effectively. iii) Tax price elasticity is almost unity (-0.99). iv) For large firm tax incentive is more effective than R&D subsidy For SME: i ) Sales volume increase R&D investment of SME (0.043) not so effectively. ii ) government R&D subsidy is crowding out R&D investment of SME not seriously (-0.0079) iii) Tax price elasticity is very inelastic (-0.054) To compare with other studies, Koga(2003) has a similar result of tax price elasticity for Japanese firm (-1.0036), Hall((l992) has a unit tax price elasticity, Bloom et al. (2002) has $-0.354{\sim}-0.124$ in the short run. From the results of our analysis we recommend that government R&D subsidy has to focus on such an areas like basic research and public sector (defense, energy, health etc.) not overlapped private R&D sector. For SME government has to focus on establishing R&D infrastructure. To promote tax incentive policy, we need to strengthen the tax incentive scheme for large size firm's R&D investment. We recommend tax credit for large size film be extended to total volume of R&D investment.