• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2009

최근 전방십자인대 손상의 치료에 남아있는 인대 다발이 이식건의 생물학적 치유를 도우며 고유 수용감각(proprioception) 기능을 유지할 뿐만 아니라 슬관절의 전방 전위 억제의 생역학적 기능을 가지는 것으로 연구되고 있다. 이러한 이론을 바탕으로 남아있는 전방십자인대를 보존하는 노력들은 다양하게 시도되고 있다. 전방십자인대 손상의 자연 경과는 아직도 논란이 되고 있으나 선택적인 환자에 있어서 보존적 치료는 비교적 좋은 결과를 얻을 수 있으므로 불필요한 재건술을 줄일 수 있다. 최근 시도되고 있는 선택적 다발 재건술 및 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 전방십자인대 재건 수술 수기들은 다양한 방법으로 시도되고 있으며 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 장점이 있으나 협소한 적응증을 가진다. 저자들의 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 전방십자인대 재건술은 자가 슬괵건을 이용한 단일다발 재건술을 시행하면서 잔존하는 이완된 다발에 봉합사를 통과시킨 후 봉합사를 추가적인 터널 없이 bioabsorbable cross pin (RIGIDfix system, Mitek, Johnson & Johnson, USA) 구멍을 통하여 당기고 고정하는 방법이다. 전방십자인대 재건술시 남아있는 다발을 보존하는 방법은 이식건의 생물학적 치유을 촉진하고 또한 경골 부착부에 남아있는 기계수용체를 보존하므로 기능적 회복에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다. 저자들의 방법은 비교적 광범위한 적응증을 가지며 적은 합병증으로 남아있는 다발을 효과적으로 보존할 수 있는 술식으로 전방십자인대 수술시 좋은 치료 선택의 하나로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.56 no.1
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2021

Considerable progress on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery has been made over the past 20 years, and the results have improved significantly. An anatomical understanding of the anterior cruciate ligament has also changed, and the surgical technique has also changed accordingly. The double-bundle concept is still valid, but the ribbon-shaped anterior cruciate ligament concept, including direct fiber and indirect fiber, is gradually replacing it. The isometry point theory no longer exists, and various surgical methods, such as single-bundle anatomical reconstruction, double-bundle reconstruction, remnant preservation, and rectangular tunnel technique, are being performed. Regarding the graft, interest in the bone-patellar tendon-bone, patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, and allogeneic tendon change over time, and this change is ongoing.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.91-92
• /
• 2008

후방십자인대 및 후외측인대 재건술 후 결과는 많은 발전이 있었지만, evidence medicine의 측면에서 재활 방법에 관한 전향적 연구는 없다. 현재까지의 재활 방법은 다양하게 소개되었지만 전방십자인대 재건술처럼 가속 재활을 하는 것은 바람직스럽지 않다. 후방십자인대, 후외측인대 그리고 다발성 인대 재건술 후 재활은 수술 방법과 환자의 재건된 인대의 상태, 하지 정렬 등에 따라서 개별화하여 점진적으로 진행하여야 할 것이고, 재활기간 동안 의사의 세심한 관찰이 필요하다.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.102-108
• /
• 2005

The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears is increasing as a result of the increasing participation of individuals of all ages in high-risk sports. Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft is the most commonly used method. With regard to BPTB graft as the go]d standard in ACL reconstruction, there are no data that refute this claim to date. Author reviewed the biomechanical properties, donor site morbidity and selection of the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and described the surgical technique of endoscopic ACL reconstruction using BPTB autograft.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.132-139
• /
• 2011

The concept of double-bundle ACL reconstruction was introduced recently to restore the anatomical and biomechanical functions of the native ACL. According to anatomical and biomechanical studies, the separate reconstruction of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle expect to increase the overall postoperative stability and clinical results compared to single-bundle ACL reconstruction. But there is still a lack of available clinical outcome studies with sufficient follow-up to demonstrate the real advantages of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence to support double-bundle technique and to address controversies existing over the usefulness of this technique.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2013

This article provides an overview of the current concepts regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, including anatomy, biomechanics, operative techniques and clinical results. Many techniques have been introduced for ACL reconstruction: single bundle reconstruction, remnant preserving augmentation, and double bundle reconstruction. Each technique has its strong and weak points, and it is not sure which technique is superior than others. It is considered to suggest that rather than to select the same method of surgery in all patients, select the method of reconstruction depending on the characteristics of the individual patient, the state of the residual ligaments and extent of the damage.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.115-122
• /
• 2005

With the increasing number of primary ACL reconstructions, revision surgery has become more frequent. Despite arthroscopic technique and treatment advancements, the current methods of reconstruction are far from perfect that a significant number of patients have an unsatisfactory. This article discusses the multiple mechanisms of failure of primary intra-articular ACL reconstruction and provides the orthopaedic surgeon with a systematic approach to the evaluation and treatment of failed ACL reconstructions.

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.84-85
• /
• 2008

후방십자인대 및 후외측인대 재건술 후 결과는 많은 발전이 있었지만, evidence medicine의 측면에서 재활 방법에 관한 전향적 연구는 없다. 현재까지의 재활 방법은 다양하게 소개되었지만 전방십자인대 재건술처럼 가속 재활을 하는 것은 바람직스럽지 않다. 후방십자인대, 후외측인대 그리고 다발성 인대 재건술 후 재활은 수술 방법과 환자의 재건된 인대의 상태, 하지 정렬 등에 따라서 개별화하여 점진적으로 진행하여야 할 것이고, 재활기간 동안 의사의 세심한 관찰이 필요하다.

• 대한정형외과스포츠의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.27-28
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.169-175
• /
• 2003

Purpose : The purpose was to evaluate the early result of revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Materials and Methods : From August 1997 to February 2002, this report presents the findings of 18 patients who had revision surgery for failed ACL reconstruction. There was an average of 39 $(7\~120)$months from index procedure to the time of revision. Allografts were used in 14 $(78\%)$cases and autografts were used in 4 $(22\%)$cases and the revision procedures were assisted by arthroscopic technique. The majority of chief complaints were instability in 16 $(89\%)$cases. Sixteen $(89\%)$ cases had 1 previous reconstruction, 2 $(11\%)$ cases had 2. Before and after revision, patients were evaluated by Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT 2000, radiographs, Lysholm score and HSS score and subjective satisfaction. Results : Average length of followup was 27 $(12\~60)$months. Preoperatively, all cases were positive in Lachman test and pivot shift test. After revision the majority of cases were negative. Objectively improving stability was confirmed by KT 2000 and all average KT 2000 was 7.75 $(3.5\~12.5)$mm preoperatively and 2.36 $(1.0\~6.0)$mm at final followup. Lysholm score and HSS score were also improved from 72.6 $(66\~77)$ and 72.5 $(68\~78)$ preoperatively to 89.2 $(80\~92)$ and 88.2 $(81\~92)$ at final followup. Most $(89\%)$ of patients were satisfied with their results. The most common causes of failed ACL reconstruction were malposition of femoral tunnel in 11 $(61\%)$cases. Conclusion : Arthroscopic revision ACL surgery with adequate graft for failed ACL reconstruction was successful in objectively and subjectively improving stability. However, considering the most common causes of failure after ACL reconstruction were errors in surgical technique, it is important that the primary ACL reconstruction should be performed with correct surgical technique.