• Title/Summary/Keyword: 적법절차

Search Result 36, Processing Time 0.034 seconds

A Study on the Seizure and Search Problems of Smart Phone Digital Evidence and Improvement measures (스마트폰 디지털증거의 압수·수색 문제점과 개선방안)

  • Yoon, Hyun-Seok
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
    • /
    • 2020.07a
    • /
    • pp.187-188
    • /
    • 2020
  • 형사소송법 제106조에서 '범위를 정하여 출력 또는 복제하는 방법이 불가능하거나 압수의 목적을 달성하기에 현저히 곤란하다고 인정되는 때에는 정보저장매체 등을 압수할 수 있다'의 규정과 제122조에서 '급속을 요하는 때'의 예외 규정을 근거로 스마트폰 압수·수색과정에서 범죄혐의와 관련성에 대한 구분 없이 정보가 무분별하게 탐색 복제되는 등 기본권을 침해하고 있으며, 영장주의 원칙에 반하는 위법한 집행이 되고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 긴급압수 후 사후영장 발부 전에 별건의 범죄혐의를 확인하거나 증거로 활용한다면 위법한 압수에 해당할 수 있는 디지털증거 압수·수색 원칙의 문제, 디지털정보의 검색과 추출과정에서 참여권 보장의 문제, 스마트폰 정보에 대한 무결성 확보 등을 문제점으로 도출하였다. 이러한 문제점을 개선하기 위해 사전영장 없는 범죄사실과 관련성이 없는 정보의 탐색이나 추출 금지, 정보검색이나 추출과정에서 피압수자의 참여권 보장 및 디지털증거 분야 전문가로부터 조력을 받을 권리 보장, 무결성 확보를 위한 절차적·실체적 적법절차 준수 등 개선방안을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

Legality of the Welfare Benefits Termination and Modification Procedure under the National Basic Living Security Act: Applying the Due Process of Law Principle (국민기초생활보장법상의 급여변경 및 중지절차의 적정성에 대한 법적 고찰 : 적법절차원칙의 적용)

  • Kim, Jihye
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.42 no.4
    • /
    • pp.239-262
    • /
    • 2011
  • The Korean government's recent large-scale termination and modification of welfare benefits revealed a procedural problem under the National Basic Living Security Act. Under the Act, welfare recipients have a legal right to make complaints only after the termination or modification is enforced; the Act fails to provide the recipients with an opportunity for a hearing before termination or modification, and this creates serious threats to the recipients, whose livelihoods are dependent on welfare benefits. Korean jurisprudence has adopted the due process of law principle. The principle originated from the due process in US jurisprudence, and Korea has applied it broadly to any government actions that restrict individuals' constitutional or legal rights. This paper reviews the termination or modification procedure under the Act with the lens of the due process principle and criticizes that the current law is not in compliance with the principle. In supporting that such termination and modification procedure infringes on welfare recipients' protected rights, this paper discusses two theories as to what rights are protected. First, termination or modification of welfare benefits can be considered as deprivation of property. The 'property' theory may be weak under Korean jurisprudence, because the concept of property under the Korean Constitution is narrowly construed. Second, this paper relies on the constitutional provision that recognizes "the right to a life worthy of human beings," which requires the State to guarantee minimum standard of living for all. As welfare recipients are deemed to receive benefits as a right under the Constitution, any deviation from the minimum requirement would constitute a violation of constitutional rights. In any case, termination or modification of welfare benefits that are concretized under the Act should be protected under the due process principle, because the principle would cover any government actions that restrict established legal rights. This paper argues that the procedural due process requires the recipients be guaranteed an opportunity to have a hearing before the termination or modification is enforced. An independent decision-maker should hear the proceedings, and the recipients should have an option to orally present their opinions in front of the decision-maker. The hearing process under the Administrative Procedures Act of Korea offers elements that would satisfy these procedural requirements. Thus, this paper concludes that the National Basic Living Security Act should be amended to adopt the hearing process under the Administrative Procedures Act in its termination and modification procedure.

A Legal Analysis of Identity Revelation of Malicious Crime's Suspect (강력범죄 피의자의 신상공개에 대한 법적 고찰)

  • Jeong, Cheol-Ho
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.12 no.7
    • /
    • pp.156-168
    • /
    • 2012
  • As the increase of violent crimes such as robbery, murder, and rape has become a social problem, the government is considering institutionalizing the identification of criminals to prevent crime and to guarantee people's right to know. Such an atmosphere led to the approval of the revision of 'Special Law On the Punishment of Specific violent Crimes' in the National Assembly in April 2010. The revision allows the revelation of the profiles of crime suspects including the pictures of their faces at the investigation stage. However, whether the revision had been effective in preventing crime has not been demonstrated empirically. Moreover, identity revelation is a grave intrusion into privacy and an abuse of human rights such as personal rights and the right to a fair trial, since personal information of criminal suspects would be released to the media prior to the court's final judgements. Also it violates the principle of presumption of innocence, the principles of due process, the principle of double jeopardy, the principle of prohibition against excessive, the principles of clarity, and the principle of liability.

A Study of improving user authentication procedures for enhanced safety of personal authorization methods (본인확인서비스의 안전성 강화를 위한 본인인증 수단 및 절차 개선 방안 연구)

  • Chio, Jung-Suk;Kim, Jong-Bae
    • Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
    • /
    • 2015.10a
    • /
    • pp.668-671
    • /
    • 2015
  • 본인확인이란 적법하고 합당한 절차에 따라 합의된 사용자임을 증명하고 인증하는 과정을 의미한다. 본 연구에서는 본인확인서비스에서 본인임을 인증하는 다양한 수단들의 특징에서 살펴보고 대표적인 본인확인수단인 아이핀과 휴대폰 서비스의 인증절차 개선 방안을 제안한다. 제안한 방안을 통해 안전성이 강화된 본인확인서비스 제공과 이용이 가능할 것이다.

A Study the Mobile Forensics Model for Improving Integrity (무결성 향상을 위한 모바일 포렌식 모델 연구)

  • Kim, Young-june;Kim, Wan-ju;Lim, Jae-sung
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
    • /
    • v.30 no.3
    • /
    • pp.417-428
    • /
    • 2020
  • With the rapid development of information and communication technology, mobile devices have become an essential tool in our lives. Mobile devices are used as important evidence in criminal proof, as they accumulate data simultaneously with PIM functions while working with users most of the time. The mobile forensics is a procedure for obtaining digital evidence from mobile devices and should be collected and analyzed in accordance with due process, just like other evidence, and the integrity of the evidence is essential because it has aspects that are easy to manipulate and delete. Also, the adoption of evidence relies on the judges' liberalism, which necessitates the presentation of generalized procedures. In this paper, a mobile forensics model is presented to ensure integrity through the generalization of procedures. It is expected that the proposed mobile forensics model will contribute to the formation of judges by ensuring the reliability and authenticity of evidence.

The Authentication Service of E-Commerce System for Mobile Internet (무선 인터넷을 위한 전자거래 시스템의 공증서비스)

  • 박동규;황유동;김학범;최길수
    • Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
    • /
    • 2003.06a
    • /
    • pp.294-297
    • /
    • 2003
  • 휴대폰 및 PDA의 급속한 보급에 따라 무선 인터넷을 통한 전자 거래에 대한 관심이 증대하고 있다. 하지만 작은 대역폭과 낮은 기기 성능등 무선 환경이 갖는 한계는 무선 인터넷을 통한 전자 거래의 발전에 장애 요인이 되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 무선을 이용한 전자거래 시스템에서 공증 서비스를 제공함으로 온라인 결재에 대한 적법한 법적인 절차를 마련할 뿐만 아니라 거래에 대한 안전성 및 신뢰성을 제공하는 시스템을 구성 하고자 한다.

  • PDF