• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.269-291
• /
• 2016

This study analyzed 1,890 KRF journals to understand the current situation and problems related to copyright management by journal publishers. The results of the study are as follows: 32.6% of journals did not provide any copyright notice, 77.1% of 1,141 journals which gave copyright information with regulation documents did not specify the type of author's property right to be transferred and most of the journals which owned copyright transferred from the author did not specify the permission needed to use their article. This study suggested that journal publishers establish the object and method for distribution of journal articles and then develop and publish their copyright policy suited to their own objective.

• Cartoon and Animation Studies
• /
• s.29
• /
• pp.243-266
• /
• 2012

As contest exhibits have been activated, a variety of organizations are holding contest with various purposes. Analysis on the guidelines prepared by various sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses shows that sponsoring bodies tend to possess copyrights of entries. Parts of guidelines of contest exhibit are the contract. While sponsoring body shows its opinion on copyright through guidelines, individual participant tends to consider it simply as a form to submit for contest exhibit rather than a contract. Now is the time to bring out a question in respect of the copyright on the contest exhibit. The important fact is that copyright on corporate contents is important, but copyright on individual contents is equally important and it must be protected and respected. This study aims to bring out a question on copyright by analyzing possession and infringement of copyright that stands forth in the guidelines of contest exhibit. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit play a role as a contract. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit shall be the ones which can be understood and accepted by both sponsoring body and winner who are the A and B of a contract. For this, change in perception of sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses with prominent position is strongly required. For the foregoing, First, Indication of Copyright: Clear and concrete terms must be used. Second, Scope of Interpretation: Concrete and detailed indication must be made for preventing indication that allows comprehensive interpretation. Third, Cost for Author's Property Right: In case sponsoring body needs to possess or use the author's property right of prize-winning work, proper rights on use considering prize money corresponding to possession or use of author's property right must be indicated. Fourth, Term of Use: The term for using author's property right must be indicated. Fifth, Scope of Rights: The scope of author's property right that sponsoring body requires must be limited and indicated. Sixth, Mutual Respect: Items related to copyright must be indicated on the basis of the concept of bilateral contract founded on mutual consideration and respect, not on the concept of unilateral contract.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.17-37
• /
• 2006

This study analyzes a copyright possession of scholarly journal papers which is published from academic society. There are three ways where the author transfers the copyright to a society, the author has the copyright, and the author and society own jointly the copyright. These ways are analyzed with their strong and weak points and then presented the desirable plans.

• The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• v.14 no.5
• /
• pp.27-33
• /
• 2014

As UCI (Universal Content Identifier) identification system becomes a national standard for content distribution, many digital contents are distributed through UCI identification system. However, problems associated with copyright infringement and copyright contracts occur due to lack of copyright information. ICN (Integrated Copyright Number), a code system developed for copyright management, includes copyright-related information for the purposes of usage settlement and accounting, illegal usage monitoring, and content filtering. ICN, however, has no information about distribution and content properties. Therefore, the linkage and integration between UCI and ICN can be a basis for the transparent and effective distribution of digital contents. In this paper, we propose a model for linking and integrating UCI and ICN, developing the efficiency in the value chain of each identified system by analyzing political factors and key technical elements between the two identification systems.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.159-180
• /
• 2017

This study analyzed changes to copyright policies in KCI journals comparatively using the previous 2 research results published in 2008 and 2016 and then gave insight into the meaning of the changes. The results of the study are as follows: Journals making the subject of copyright public had increased from 34% in 2008 to 67% in 2016. Journals transferring copyright from authors remained almost the same, with only a slight increase from 90% to 91% in the same period. Journals using the term 'publication rights' instead of 'copyright' had decreased; on the other hand, journals using the term 'reproduction right' and 'right of transmission' had increased. Use of copyright transfer agreement had increased from 25% to 50%; on the other hand, self archiving policy remained almost the same, decreasing slightly from 13% to 12%. This study argues that these changes mean the establishment of copyright industrialization for Korean journals and that the publishing bodies appear to be the most powerful main agent among stakeholders participating in scholarly publishing in this process.

• Proceedings of the IEEK Conference
• /
• 2008.06a
• /
• pp.61-62
• /
• 2008

콘텐츠가 디지털화 되고 네트워크화 되면서 저작권 보호에 관한 문제가 중요해 지고 있다. 디지털 장치를 소유하고 네트워크에 연결이 가능한 사람들은 네트워크 상에 있는 디지털 콘텐츠를 적은 노력과 비용으로 보다 쉽게 접근하고 내려받고 복제할 수 있게 되었다. 반면 저작권법은 저작권자에게 콘텐츠에 대한 모든 권한을 인정하고 있다. DRM 기술에 대해 일반적으로 논한다면, 대체로 공격자가 똑똑해질수록 기술은 복잡해지고 무거워진다. 즉, 디지털 콘텐츠를 보호하기 위한비용이 증가하는 것을 의미한다. 따라서 콘텐츠 보호는 대규모의 블록버스트(blockbuster) 영화, 중요한 서류에만 적용되는 것이 바람직하다고 생각하기도 한다. 이러한 상황은 특정한 경우에 가장 적합한 보호의 수준을 결정하기 어렵게 만든다. 따라서 체계적이고 실용적이면서 디지털 콘텐츠 가치 사슬에서의 가치 평가, 위험성 평가를 위해 콘텐츠 공학적인 관점을 도입하는 것이 필요하다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.10a
• /
• pp.664-666
• /
• 2003

DRM (Digital Rights Management)은 디지털 저작권 관리를 뜻하는 말로, 전자책, 음악, 게임 등의 디지털 컨텐츠의 지적 재산권을 보호하기 위해 디지털 컨텐츠의 무단 유통을 방지하는 서비스를 의미한다. 이러한 DRM 시스템은 주로 유선 환경에서 사용되고 있었으나. 최근 정보통신 기술의 발달로 인한 무선 환경에서의 디지털 컨텐츠의 사용요구가 증가함에 따라 DRM 시스템은 유선 환경뿐만 아니라 무선 환경에서도 그 중요성이 날로 커지고 있는 실정이다. 현재 DRM은 디지털 컨텐츠에 대한 저작권에 대한 보호 뿐 아니라 더 나아가 디지털 컨텐츠를 이용한 마케팅 솔루션을 제공하는 것까지 그 영역을 확장함에 따라 각 비즈니스 영역별로 적합하도록 다양한 DRM 솔루션이 제시되고 있다. 이로 인해 시스템간의 호환성을 위해 현재 OMA 등의 단체에서 무선 DRM에 관한 표준을 제시하고 있다. 그러나 표준으로 제시되고 있는 DRM 모델에서는 인가된 사용자만이 컨텐츠를 사용할 수 있도록 하는 인증서비스에 관한 부분이 매우 취약한 상황이다. 이에 따라 본 논문에서는 키 관리 서버와 사용자별 암호키 리스트를 다르게 소유할 수 있도록 하는 방법을 사용하는 인증서비스를 제시해보고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2014.08a
• /
• pp.79-84
• /
• 2014

학술정보에 무료로 접근할 수 있고 적합한 용도에서 자유롭게 다운로드, 복제, 검색, 인쇄, 링크 등이 가능하도록 하는 오픈액세스에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 학술기관은 연구결과물의 노출과 인용을 위하여 여러 가지 방법을 통하여 원문제공서비스를 제공하고 있다. 이 연구에서는 국내 대학부설연구소가 발행하는 학술지 중 KCI에 등재되어있는 학술지의 원문제공서비스 유형과 현황, 그리고 게재 논문의 저작권 소유주체를 살펴보고 이를 통해 대학부설연구소 학술지의 오픈액세스 방향을 모색해 보고자 한다.

• Korea Science and Art Forum
• /
• v.23
• /
• pp.111-122
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this multi-disciplinary convergent study is to establish Image Copyright Archive Model for Museums to protect image copyright and vitalize the use of images out of necessity of research and development on copyright services over the life cycle of art contents created by the museums and out of the necessity to vitalize distribution market of image copyright contents in creative industry and to formulate management system of copyright services. This study made various suggestions for enhancement of transparency and efficiency of art contents ecosystem through vitalization of use and recycling of image copyright materials by proposing standard system for calculation, distribution, settlement and monitoring of copyright royalty of 1,000 domestic museums, galleries and exhibit halls. First, this study proposed contents and structure design of image copyright archive model and, by proposing art contents distribution service platform for prototype simulation, execution simulation and model operation simulation, established art contents copyright royalty process model. As billing system and technological development for image contents are still in incipient stage, this study used the existing contents billing framework as basic model for the development of billing technology for distribution of museum collections and artworks and automatic division and calculation engine for copyright royalty. Ultimately, study suggested image copyright archive model which can be used by artists, curators and distributors. In business strategy, study suggested niche market penetration of museum image copyright archive model. In sales expansion strategy, study established a business model in which effective process of image transaction can be conducted in the form of B2B, B2G, B2C and C2B through flexible connection of museum archive system and controllable management of image copyright materials can be possible. This study is expected to minimize disputes between copyright holder of artwork images and their owners and enhance manageability of copyrighted artworks through prevention of such disputes and provision of information on distribution and utilization of art contents (of collections and new creations) owned by the museums. In addition, by providing a guideline for archives of collections of museums and new creations, this study is expected to increase registration of image copyright and to make various convergent businesses possible such as billing, division and settlement of copyright royalty for image copyright distribution service.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.777-786
• /
• 2023

Generative AI systems are expected to be more widely utilized. However, relatively little attention has been paid to understanding how users perceive and accept generative AI results. To identify strategies for increasing the future use of generative AI and prepare for potential issues, we organized design workshop for the general user group and the designer group. They created artwork utilizing Novel AI and semi-structured interview was followed to evaluate their attitudes toward generative AI and its copyright. Results indicate that the general public views generative AI positively, while the design-related group views it quite negatively. The participants expressed concerns as to the misuse the system, specifically related to copyright issues. People who are likely to utilize generative AI outcomes have insisted more strongly that copyrights should be their own. Those working in the design field highly evaluated the possibility of using generative AI in their work. Copyright perceptions were not significantly influenced by users' satisfaction or their level of involvement in the creation process. We discuss design implications for interfaces using generative AI based on the findings.