• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.2 no.3
• /
• pp.61-66
• /
• 2009

Previous disaster management system in Korea was focusing on post-disaster, recovery phase. However, modern disaster management system should be focusing on the mitigation activities to minimize human and property damages based on the proper prediction and forecast of various natural disasters and timely dissemination of disaster information to the people. Recently, more frequent and larger scaled disasters have been reported around the globe, mainly due to the environment change not only by physical anomalies such as climate change but also by socio-economic transformations such as urbanization and industrialization. This study describes current practices in disaster management for climate change adaptation of advanced countries and a possible disaster management standard system that can be applied in Korea, based on the case studies on the European countries who are improving their disaster management systems against climate change.

• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 2009

The statistics of disaster and safety control which have been produced by NEMA(National Emergency Management Agency) and other related agencies have some problems which show redundancies and the lack of connections. These problems can result in disbelief of disaster-management related policies and cause uncertainties on standardization. One of the main problems is caused by the lack of an integrated system that can coordinate available statistical resources. The objectives of this paper are to propose possible ways for the rearrangement of statistics categories, the improvement of statistics indicators and the integration of statistics of disaster and safety management based on the improvement of related laws and regulations. Through the integrated system for an efficient production of disaster and safety-related statistics, it will be possible to establish more accredited disaster-management policies based on the scientific statistics and international standard.

• The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
• /
• v.11 no.9
• /
• pp.827-840
• /
• 2016

In recent years, our society, because of the arrival of a new paradigm according to the rapid changes in ICT has entered into future smart society and the ubiquitous era. So it can be a notable turning point in the city disaster prevention system with big data, aspects of the era change. Therefore, this study was to derive a desirable vision for the big data city disaster prevention informatization in terms of ICT city disaster prevention system development as preparedness for the city disaster by applying 'scenario planning' as a foresight method. Soon this study derived a successful city disaster prevention informatization strategy as preparedness for the city disaster, for example, in terms of water pollution and disaster prevention of Busan Ecodeltacity. It proposed the big data city disaster prevention informatization system with the use of the administrative aspects of information with spatial informatization as big data information. Also this study explored the future leadership strategy of the big data city disaster prevention informatization in smart society and smart eco-city. Eventually in 2030 to around, in order to still remain our city disaster prevention informatization as a leading ICT nation, this study suggested the following strategy. It is important to ready the advanced ubiquitous administrative spatial informatization and ICT disaster prevention system with big data in terms of water pollution and disaster prevention of Busan Ecodeltacity.

• International Journal of Highway Engineering
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.217-231
• /
• 2009

In order to manage traffic operations efficiently, it is required to establish evacuation strategies, including path, disaster prevention, and signal control. This is because the delayed response of operators would cause dreadful loss of our community. Therefore, it is very important to do the research related to traffic disaster prevention system. In this paper, we select the City of Cheongju as a study area since lots of damage resulting from natural disaster such as storm and flood have been frequently taken place. In addition, this paper suggest traffic disaster prevention measures and analyzed its effect on signal operation to achieve high level of traffic efficiency. As a result, traffic flow is similar to normal condition when we applied developed signal operation method. It is also demonstrated if disaster information is spread out as fast as it can be, and signal operation is managed properly in case by case, we conclude that user safety has to be secured.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.419-420
• /
• 2022

재난관리현장 및 관련 학문 분야에서는 사건(incident), 사고(accident), 위험(risk), 위기(crisis), 재해(disaster), 재난(disaster)과 같은 유사성이 있는 전문용어들이 혼용되어 사용되고 있다. 전문용어의 경우 관련 학과 학생 및 종사자들은 그 내용과 의미를 정확하게 이해하고 있어야 하며, 이와 관련한 전문용어의 정의를 명확하게 나타내는 지침이 필요하다고 말할 수 있다. 「재난 및 안전관리 기본법」제 3조에서 재난에 대한 정의는 명시하고 있지만, 재난과 재해와의 차이점을 명확하게 알 수 없으며, 위험과 위기에 대한 차이점을 또한 파악하기 어려움에 있다. 이러한 이유로 관련 학과 대학생 및 관련 업종 종사자들이 재난에 사용되는 용어를 명확하게 구분하여 설명하지 못하고, 명확하게 구분하지 아니하고 사용하는 것이 아닌가라는 판단에 이르게 되었다. 용어의 혼용은 국민들에게 재난에 관한 의식의 혼란을 유발하고, 혼란스러움으로 인한 무관심이 발생, 그 무관심에 의해 재난에 관한 의식이 저하될 수도 있다고 생각하였다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 재난 의식의 하락으로 비롯되는 대응의 부적절함을 방지하기 위해 1) 관련 학과 학생 및 종사자들을 대상으로 전문용어의 이해도 조사, 2) 관련 용어의 정의를 조사 및 분석을 수행하였다.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2010.02a
• /
• pp.69.2-69.2
• /
• 2010

특정관리대상시설은 "재난 및 안전관리 기본법" 에서 재난발생의 위험이 높거나 재난예방을 위하여 계속적으로 관리할 필요가 있다고 인정되는 시설 및 지역을 의미한다. 특정관리대상시설은 재난관리책임기관의 장이 지정하고 관리하도록 되어 있으나, 그 시설의 대상이 약10만개에 이르고, 시설의 종류도 42개에 달하며, 각기 개별법에 의한 안전관리가 추진되고 있어 실제적인 종합안전관리에는 많은 어려움이 있다. 본 연구에서는 다종다양한 특정관리대상시설물의 안전관리 실태를 조사하고, 효과적이고, 통합적인 특정관리대상시설의 안전관리를 위하여 종합안전관리시스템 개발을 위한 구축방안을 제시하였다.

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.78-84
• /
• 2012

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.19-21
• /
• 2017

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.21-27
• /
• 2018

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.10-12
• /
• 2018