• Title/Summary/Keyword: 장횡거(張橫渠)

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

장횡거의 천도론(天道論)에 대한 연구

  • Jo, Won-Il
    • 중국학논총
    • /
    • no.63
    • /
    • pp.325-342
    • /
    • 2019
  • 張橫渠的道德思想, 並不禁止小體之欲. 它須透過儒家本體思想的不斷提昇, 才能達到天人合一的目標, 故其所言盡性爲一途, 而因明致誠, 因誠致明則是另一途. 張橫渠曾經說, "至誠, 天性也; 不息, 天命也. 人能至誠則性盡而神可窮矣.", 誠爲實有之至, 因爲人一旦有了形體便具備了誠體. 換言之, 誠爲性體, 而至誠則是重返太和之虛的本體思想. 至於天命, 更是天地間流轉不息的轉化, 若是人可以達到至誠境界, 人之本性自然可以窮極, 而天地運作之誠之信, 自然也可以參透. 張橫渠認爲自誠而明者爲天德良知, 故誠爲本體之性, 並非透過經驗知識的體驗與探索. 他認爲誠須透過天道與性的合一才能朗現, 其歷程猶如義命能體現理, 仁智能體現聖, 動靜能體現神, 陰陽能體現道一樣, 且性與天道爲宇宙形成之道, 它是超然地存於誠之中. 人因生而存於己身之誠, 以能體悟天道運行不已之道, 猶如孝子所以能事天誠身, 因爲仁孝之槪念已超然於人性之上, 儼然成爲爲人之本體通則.

The Dialogue of Gi-Hak and Sim-Hak (기학(氣學)과 심학(心學)의 횡단적 소통구조에 관한 연구 - 장횡거(張橫渠)와 왕양명(王陽明)의 이론을 중심으로 -)

  • Jang, Yun-su
    • Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
    • /
    • v.130
    • /
    • pp.247-276
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this paper is to explore how Zhang Zai(張載)''s Gi-Hak(氣學) and Wang Shou-Ren(王守仁)''s Sim-Hak(心學) are interrelated, which differs from prior positions viewing the two as separate, unrelated philosophies or ones standing in contrast to each other. By direct comparing the notions Tae-Heo(太虛) and Yang-Ji(良知), I tried to explain that ontological structures of Gi-Hak and Sim-Hak are interrelated ; and by comparing Dae-Sim(大心) and Chi-Yang-Ji(致良知), I made an argument that Gong-Bu-Ron(工夫論) of Gi-Hak and Sim-Hak corresponds to each other. Zhang Zai''s the doctrine of Tae-Heo can be seen as a respond to Jeok-Myeol-Ron(寂滅論) in Buddhism ; therefore, understanding Sim-Hak in terms of Gi-Hak, that is, interpreting the fundamental meaning of Yang-Ji as Tae-Heo, can free Yang-Myeong-Sim-Hak(陽明心學) from the unceasing criticism by Ju-Ja-Hak(朱子學) that it is a 'Buddhistic heresy'. This study could be highly significant in that it enables us to read the tradition of Zhang Zai not only from the viewpoint of u-Ja-Hak, but even from ang-Myeong-Sim-Hak tradition. I interpreted Yangming School of Mind as a developmental succession of Neo-Confucianism, and understood Zhang Zai''s Gi-Hak as a theoretical pioneer of Wang Shou-Ren''s Sim-Hak.

Neo-confucianism(新儒學), Zhang Heng-qu(張橫渠)'s Qi-monism(氣一元論) and Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s Theory of Internal Injury(內傷學說) (신유학(新儒學), 장횡거(張橫渠)의 기일원론(氣一元論)과 이동원(李東垣)의 내상학설(內傷學說))

  • Lee, Yong-Bum
    • Journal of Korean Medical classics
    • /
    • v.26 no.3
    • /
    • pp.11-18
    • /
    • 2013
  • Objective : This paper was designed to confirm the relation between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)'s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)'s 'Qi-monism(氣一元論)'. Method : Through a comparative literature review, I searched for the commonality between Li Dong-yuan(李東垣)'s theory of internal injury(內傷學說) and Neo-confucianism(新儒學)'s academic orientation, particularly Zhang Heung-qu(張橫渠)'s 'Qi-monism(氣一元論)', and also examined the difference in the meaning of 'Primordial Qi(元氣)' in Qi-monism and that Lee Dong-yuan proposed. Result & Conclusion : The central theme of Neo-confucianism, 'Staying on the Golden Path(允執厥中)', has a commonality with Li Dong-yuan's theory of internal injury that emphasized Primordial Qi, and the concepts of "Great Vacuity as Qi(太虛卽氣)", "Two Properties Inherent in a Single Object(一物兩體)", and "the Nature of Acquired Disposition(氣質之性)" have commonality with the concepts of "The Given from the Vacuity of Natural World(所受於天)", Up & Down Movement(升降運動), and Yin Fire(陰火) of Primordial Qi in Li Dong-yuan's theory of internal injury respectively. However, the concept of Primordial Qi in the Theory of Qi-monism refers to the building blocks of all things in the universe, whereas the concept of Primordial Qi that Li Dong-yuan proposed has no meaning of component of body but driving force that maintains the phenomenon of life.