• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제55권12호
• /
• pp.842-849
• /
• 2017

The term, 'crossed occlusion' implies clinical situation in which the residual teeth in one arch have no contact with those in the antagonistic arch, resulting in the collapse of occlusal vertical dimension. The treatment goal of this pathologic condition is restoration of the collapsed vertical dimension and stabilization of abnormal mandibular position. Previously, konus removable prostheses or tooth supported overdentures were suggested to solve crossed occlusion. Nowadays, dental implants have been used for definitive support to solve this problem. In this case report, a 65 years old female patient had a crossed occlusion, in which the maxillary posterior residual teeth and mandibular anterior residual teeth cross. Interim removable and fixed dental prostheses were used to confirm the proper vertical and horizontal jaw relation. After that, the mandibular posterior edentulous region was restored with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Computer tomography guided implant surgery was performed according to the concept of the restoration-driven implant placement. The maxillary anterior edentulous region was restored with Kennedy class IV removable prosthesis, considering the patient's economic status. The patient's jaw position and prostheses have been well maintained at the follow-up after 6 months of definitive restoration. The antero-posterior crossed occlusion problems appeared to be effectively solved with the combination of removable in one arch and implant-supported fixed prostheses in the other.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.255-262
• /
• 2016

본 증례는 심미적, 기능적 상실을 동반하여 심하게 마모가 진행된 환자의 치료에 중점을 둔다. 장기간의 구치부 지지 상실은 포괄적인 보철 수복을 요한다. 정확한 임상적 및 방사선학적 검사, 진단 납형 제작, 수직 고경 평가 후, 임시 수복물을 통해 환자의 적응도를 평가하였다. 8주간의 관찰기간 후에, 별다른 이상이 발견되지 않아, 최종 수복물을 제작하였다. 최종 수복물 장착 6개월 후에도 만족스런 기능적, 심미적 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.209-222
• /
• 2011

상실된 상악 전치부는 고정성 보철물이나 가철성 보철물 또는 임플란트 보철 등 다양한 방법을 통하여 수복할 수 있다. 이 중 적절하게 제작된 회전삽입로 국소의치는 경제적, 해부학적 한계를 가진 환자에서 기능적, 심미적으로 우수한 결과를 보일 수 있다. 회전삽입로 국소의치는 일반적 국소의치의 일직선 삽입로와는 달리 국소의치의 한 쪽 유지장치부가 먼저 장착된 뒤 회전하면서 반대쪽의 유지부가 삽입되어 의치가 안착된다. 이 때 언더컷 속에 위치하는 견고한 부연결장치에서 유지력을 획득하고 회전삽입로와 평행하게 긴 수로형 혹은 구미형(dovetail) 레스트 시트에서 지지 및 파지를 얻으므로 일반적인 가요성 유지암 및 파지암을 생략할 수 있어 심미적으로 우수하고 위생 관리에도 유리하다. 그러나 회전삽입로 국소의치에서 한번 제작된 견고한 유지부는 정교한 조절이 불가능해 상대적으로 기공작업이 어렵고 정밀한 보철물 디자인이 필요하므로 임상적인 성공을 위해서는 회전삽입로 국소의치의 원리에 대한 깊은 이해가 필요하다. 이번 증례보고는 회전삽입로 국소의치를 장착한 후 장기적인 유지관리의 어려움을 겪은 증례를 소개하고 이를 예방할 수 있는 이론적, 기공적 주의사항을 보고하고자 한다.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.283-305
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study was to analyze the stress distribution of condylar regions and edentulous mandible with implant-supported cantilever prostheses on the certain conditions, such as amount of load, location of load, direction of load, fixation or non-fixation on the condylar regions. Three dimensional finite element analysis was used for this study. FEM model was created by using commercial software, ANSYS(Swanson, Inc., U.S.A.). Fixed model which was fixed on the condylar regions was modeled with 74323 elements and 15387 nodes and spring model which was sprung on the condylar regions was modeled with 75020 elements and 15887 nodes. Six Br${\aa}$nemark implants with 3.75 mm diameter and 13 mm length were incorporated in the models. The placement was 4.4 mm from the midline for the first implant; the other two in each quardrant were 6.5 mm apart. The stress distribution on each model through the designed mandible was evaluated under 500N vertical load, 250N horizontal load linguobuccally, buccal 20 degree 250N oblique load and buccal 45 degree 250N oblique load. The load points were at 0 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm along the cantilever prostheses from the center of the distal fixture. The results were as follows; 1. The stress distribution of condylar regions between two models showed conspicuous differences. Fixed model showed conspicuous stress concentration on the condylar regions than spring model under vertical load only. On the other hand, spring model showed conspicuous stress concentration on the condylar regions than fixed model under 250N horizontal load linguobuccally, buccal 20 degree 250N oblique load and buccal 45 degree 250N oblique load. 2. Fixed model showed stress concentration on the posterior and mesial side of working and balancing condylar necks but spring model showed stress concentration on the posterior and mesial side of working condylar neck and the posterior and lateral side of balancing condylar neck under vertical load. 3. Fixed model showed stress concentration on the posterior and lateral side of working condylar neck and the anterior and mesial side of balancing condylar neck but spring model showed stress concentration on the anterior sides of working and balancing condylar necks under horizontal load linguobuccally. 4. Fixed model showed stress concentration on the posterior side of working condylar neck and the posterior and lateral side of balancing condylar neck but spring model showed stress concentration on the anterior side of working condylar neck and the anterior and lateral side of balancing condylar neck under buccal 20 degree oblique load. 5. Fixed model showed stress concentration on the anterior and lateral side of working condylar neck and the posterior and mesial side of balancing condylar neck but spring model showed stress concentration on the anterior side of working condylar neck and the anterior and lateral side of balancing condylar neck under buccal 45 degree oblique load.. 6. The stress distribution of bone around implants between two models revealed difference slightly. In general, magnitude of Von Mises stress was the greatest at the bone around the most distal implant and the progressive decrease more and more mesially. Under vertical load, the stress values were similar between implant neck and superstructure vertically, besides the greatest on the distal side horizontally. 7. Under horizontal load linguobuccally, buccal 20 degree oblique load and buccal 45 degree oblique load, the stress values were the greatest on the implant neck vertically, and great on the labial and lingual sides horizontally. After all, it was considered that spring model was an indispensable condition for the comprehension of the stress distributions of condylar regions.