• Journal of Gastric Cancer
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.18-25
• /
• 2009

목적: 위암 수술 후 회복을 위한 입원기간은 지금까지 대개 1주일 이상이었다. 이러한 회복기간을 요구하는 가장 큰 이유는 수술 후 3~4일간의 금식기간의 필요성과 합병증 발생 여부에 대한 관찰 때문이다. 본 연구진은 이번 연구를 통하여 수술 후 환자를 빠른 시일 내에 일상으로 복귀시키기 위한 임상진료 지침서를 만들고 이를 환자들에게 적용하여, 그 유용성과 안정성을 평가 하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2007년 10월부터 2008년 6월까지 성모병원에서 연속적으로 수술을 받은 103명의 환자를 수술 후 조기회복을 위한 임상진료 지침서의 적용대상으로 하였다. 임상진료 지침서에는 수술 전 최소한의 시술, 수술 후 적절한 통증관리 및 수액공급, 수술 후 조기 보행과 조기경구영양공급 등을 포함하고 있다. 진료지침 제외 기준을 수술 전, 수술 중 그리고 수술 후에 따라 마련하였다. 결과: 103명의 환자들 중 모두 19명의 환자가 각각 수술 전 5명, 수술 중 7명 그리고 수술 직후 7명의 제외 기준에 따라 제외되었다. 제외되지 않은 84명(81.6%)에 대하여 진료지침 시행 초기엔 수술 8일 후 퇴원을 계획하였으며, 최근엔 6일 후 퇴원을 계획하고 있다. 이들 중 22명(26.2%)의 환자에서 수술 후 합병증이 발생하였으며, 위장관 관련 합병증은 6명, 감염 관련 합병증은 8명에서 발생하였다. 환자들의 임상적, 수술적 특징에 따라서 합병증 발생률의 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 결론: 위암 수술 후 조기회복을 위한 임상진료 지침서는 제외 기준을 적용 후 대상 환자를 선정하고 활용한 결과, 환자들에게 유용하고 안전하게 사용되었다.

• 동의생리병리학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.347-351
• /
• 2007

This study was done to report the improvement of second case report form(CRF) and standard operating procedure(SOP) of Tentative Korean Standard Differentiation of the Symptoms and Signs for Stroke. We were in charge of developing case report form(CRF) and educating the investigators. In the process of this project, we needed to develop standard operating procedure(SOP) for this CRF. So we made Tentative Korean Standard Differentiation of the Symptoms and Signs for Stroke and tried clinical application at Department of Oriental Internal Medicine of Wonkwang University and Daejeon University in 2005. And in this pilot study we can find out some problems and need to improve it. We strengthen the incision and exclusion criteria of CRF We canceled the Chief complains entry for efficiency. We reflected the decision of Stroke standard committee. We reduced the differentiation index of CRF to promote efficiency and accuracy. We rearranged the order of the differentiation index to promote rationality and practicality. We regulated detail item belonging to Differentiation index. We used a colloquialism in question. We inserted flow chart in SOP. We inserted picture of diagnostic index.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.32-45
• /
• 2000

Background : Critical pathway is an optional sequencing and timing of interventions by physicians, nurses, and other staff for a particular diagnosis or procedure, designed to minimize delays and resource utilization, and to maximize quality of care; abbreviated versions of case management plans that show critical outcome and key incidents that occur in a predictable and timely fashion to achieve an appropriate length of stay. This study is to develop a critical pathway for vaginal delivery and cesarean section to assess the degree of contentment of the patients and medical personnel and to implement clinical application to see how we could meet the need to guide patients to achieve continuum of care. Method : Critical pathways were developed for normal vaginal delivery and casarean section. LOS(length of stay) target for vaginal delivery was 1 day after delivery & 5 days after C-section. It was distributed to the mother at the OPD and explained thoroughly. It was applied when patients got into the Labor & Delivery Floor. We applied total of 42 patients (30 normal deliveries & 12 C-sections) from February to March, 2000. We performed patient satisfaction survey to all 42 patients, 24 nurses, and 7 residents for internal customer satisfaction. Results : Twenty six patients out of 42 responded to the survey. Twenty one patients out of 26 answered satisfactory. Eighty four percent of 21 respondents replied Critical pathway worked very well. Treatment column got the most compliance. Eleven out of 31 employees thought critical pathway is very helpful for the patient care. Eighteen people didn't see any difference. In their opinion, treatment got the least compliance, which is the contrary to patients opinion. Fifty eight percent of respondents thought that critical pathway can expedite early discharge. Conclusion : Patient satisfaction was higher than we expected but we still need to revise the form. It is recommended to analyze the cost and variance check in the future.