• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.119-136
• /
• 2015

The contracting parties must be provided a litigation scheme in order to resolve a dispute. This means taking advantage of effective measures for mediation or arbitration. A lease transaction is likely to occur mainly after a dispute. It is necessary to take the appropriate measures in advance. In general, when a variety of contracts are created, conflicts arise and disputes have to be resolved through mediation and arbitration documents, and adjustment or intervention is called for. Arbitration system is a system that is established based on the trust of the arbitral tribunal. For such system, quality education for enhancing professionalism required of the arbitrator is important. A party responding to an arbitration agreement presents a problem. The current system must ensure that there are no disadvantaged parties. However, a party must depend on an arbitration agreement that is part of the law rescue system. A litigation support by the local Bar Association must be carried out. It should be notified of the contents of the contract to select a strategy that will best resolve the conflict. In the case of lease transactions, there is a need to create a scheme to make a standard agreement that inserts an arbitration clause. Lease sale and purchase agreement or lease agreement is a form of contract that has been frequently used. Here, the arbitration agreement clause for a lawyer that will serve as arbitrator should be inserted. It is a scheme that can be activated for individuals in poor areas. In addition, it is possible to see it taking a scheme to take advantage of the lawyer system for the future of the town. The Attorney System of a town is a system that the Korean Bar Association, Legal Department has put in place since 2013. If a real estate trade dispute occurs, the role of the intermediary attorney should be to carry out his duties efficiently. In the case of real estate transaction conflicts, the lawyer of the village should be registered as the arbitrator. It is important to establish a basis of regulations through this type of real estate transaction accident analysis. Before proceeding with various adjustment systems, it is desirable to expand the arbitration region. Now we need a realtor amendment. It is the part where fragmentation of intermediary qualification is required, along with the eligibility of a subdivision.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권7호
• /
• pp.193-202
• /
• 2015

우리나라 주택임대차보호법은 민법의 특별법으로 국민의 주거생활의 안정을 보장하기 위하여 1981년 3월 5일 법률 제3379호로 제정된 이후 지금까지 15차례의 개정을 통하여 유래를 찾아볼 수 없을 정도로 무주택영세민의 권익보호에 앞장서 왔다. 그러나 급히 서둘러 만든 입법이어서 법조문 제3조 제1항 "주택임차인이 임차주택을 인도받고 주민등록까지 마치면 그 다음날부터 그 주택의 소유자가 제3자로 변경되더라도 그 제3자에 대하여 임차권을 가지고서 대항할 수 있다"는 대항력 부분에 있어서 시행 당초부터 무주택영세민의 보호취지에 역행한다는 문제점이 노출되었던 것이 사실이다. 또한 이 조항이 오히려 사회적 약자들의 주거문제를 더욱 심각하게 만들었고, 국가는 이에 대한 대책이나 보호방법을 현실에 맞추어 개정하지 못한 이유로 지금까지 다양한 문제들이 제기되어 주택임대차와 관련된 분쟁들이 많이 발생되고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 임차인의 주거안정을 위하여 주택임대차보호법의 대항력에 대한 문제점을 도출하고, 외국입법례를 통하여 주택임차인들에게 현실적으로 주거안정에 기여할 수 있는 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다.