• Title/Summary/Keyword: 일본의 북극 정책

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

일본의 북극 정책 방향 - OPRF 북극 제언을 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Gyeong-Sin
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2012.10a
    • /
    • pp.60-62
    • /
    • 2012
  • 올 3월 일본 해양정책연구재단(Ocean Policy Research Foundation : OPRF)이 북극에 관한 추진 시책을 발표했다. 국제법, 안전보장, 과학조사, 조선, 해운, 기상관측 등 각 분야의 전문가들로 구성된 '일본 북극해 회의'가 지난 2년 동안의 연구를 통해 일본정부가 북극의 지속가능한 이용을 위해 추진해야 할 정책 방향을 제시한 것이다. 이번 보고서는 행정조직 선박 및 항로 지구환경 안전보장 자원개발 국제물류 국제협력 등 북극 전반을 다룬 일본의 종합적인 정책으로, 일본 해양정책연구재단은 이번 보고서에서 북극해를 전담할 전담조직 신설, 새로운 해상방위 대책 수립, 러시아와의 협력 강화 등 9가지 정책 방향을 제시했다.

  • PDF

국내외 북극해항로 연구현황 및 전망

  • Jeong, Tae-Gwon
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2015.10a
    • /
    • pp.121-123
    • /
    • 2015
  • 북극해 항로관련 본격적인 연구는 노르웨이, 러시아, 일본 등이 공동으로 주관하여 1993년 시작되어 1999년에 끝난 INSROP이라고 할 수 있다. 우리나라는 이들 나라에 비하여 많이 늦었지만 관심을 가지고 산발적으로 진행하여 왔다. 우리나라에서의 북극과 관련한 연구는 극지연구소가 극지기후변화, 극지지구시스템, 극지생명과학, 극지해양환경 등 지구과학적인 측면에서 연구를 하고 있고 한국해양수산개발원은 해운항만정책, 해양정책, 해양환경정책 등 정책적인 측면에서 연구를 하여 왔다. 그리고 한국해양과학기술원에서는 한국해양대학과 공동으로 빙해수조를 통하여 얼음과 내빙선체 등과 관련된 연구를 하고 있다. 특히, 2013년 5월 15일 우리나라가 북극이사국의 정식 옵서버국이 됨에 따라 북극해 항로에 대한 국민적 관심이 고조되고 있으나 북극해항로에 관한 연구가 일천하기 때문에 현재까지 진행된 국내외 연구결과를 조사분석하여 북극해항로분야에서의 새로운 연구분야를 찾고자 한다.

  • PDF

A Study on the Climate Change and the Policy of Natural Gas Exploitation on the Arctic Region (기후변화와 북극 유·가스전 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Boyoung;Ryu, Siho;Park, Yonhe
    • Environmental and Resource Economics Review
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.787-813
    • /
    • 2009
  • Because of global warming, the thawing of the Arctic ice cap is slowly accelerating. That is the hot issue nowadays. According to the each country's climate change policy, it is boom in the world to lessen the consuming of the fossil fuel those are oil, coal and natural gas. But on the contrary the thawing of the Arctic ice cap is the chance to make the natural gas producing unit cost lower. The purpose of this paper is to search the Arctic policy of each country under the contradictory relationship between promoting the climate change policy and exploiting the natural gas on the Arctic. Specially, there are huge natural gas reserves in Russia on the Arctic region, Russia's exploiting the natural gas on the Arctic will affect on the natural gas supply-demand balance of world natural gas market strongly in the future. Therefore it needs to prepare the future energy alternative policy for Korea's energy security. Russia has Yamal Peninsular where is abundant on natural gas reserver, and she can supply natural gas by LNG ship all over the world via the Arctic route. This means that the structure of world natural gas market be changed gradually. It will be possible in 2030~2040. And such a change is very important because new natural gas trading type can do it through not only overcoming the geological restriction but also shifting the main trading type from PNG(Pipeline Natural Gas) to LNG(Liquified Natural Gas). Therefore it is necessary that we should let this be a good lesson to ourselves through the government action of other countries (China, Japan) those also have no sovereignty over the Arctic as Korea.

  • PDF

일본의 해양 분야 위성 활용 정책 고찰

  • Kim, Gyeong-Sin
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
    • /
    • 2013.06a
    • /
    • pp.285-287
    • /
    • 2013
  • UN과 우주 강국을 중심으로 위성을 활용한 국제협력이 강화되고 있는 추세임. 특히 미국과 유럽 등 전통적인 해양 강국은 위성의 해양 분야 활용도를 확대하고 있으며 국제 협력도 구체화하고 있음. 'Space Rush'와 'Ocean Rush'에 이은, 우주와 해양의 통합 관리체제를 통한 새로운 해양강국 출현의 시대로 접어들 가능성도 있음다. 이번 논문에서는 우주 강국인 일본이 추진하고 있는 우주와 해양 융 복합 전략을 분석하였음. 이를 위해 일본의 해양과 우주의 행정 협업, 우주기본계획 중 해양분야, 제2차 해양기본계획 중 우주(위성 분야), 해양 분야 인공위성 활용 사례 및 국제 협력 사례 등을 제시하였음. 일본의 해양 분야 위성 활용과 위성을 활용한 국제 해양 협력은 향후에도 지속되고 확대될 것으로 판단됨.

  • PDF

Eurasian Naval Power on Display: Sino-Russian Naval Exercises under Presidents Xi and Putin (유라시아 지역의 해군 전력 과시: 시진핑 주석과 푸틴 대통령 체제 하에 펼쳐지는 중러 해상합동훈련)

  • Richard Weitz
    • Maritime Security
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-53
    • /
    • 2022
  • One manifestation of the contemporary era of renewed great power competition has been the deepening relationship between China and Russia. Their strengthening military ties, notwithstanding their lack of a formal defense alliance, have been especially striking. Since China and Russia deploy two of the world's most powerful navies, their growing maritime cooperation has been one of the most significant international security developments of recent years. The Sino-Russian naval exercises, involving varying platforms and locations, have built on years of high-level personnel exchanges, large Russian weapons sales to China, the Sino-Russia Treaty of Friendship, and other forms of cooperation. Though the joint Sino-Russian naval drills began soon after Beijing and Moscow ended their Cold War confrontation, these exercises have become much more important during the last decade, essentially becoming a core pillar of their expanding defense partnership. China and Russia now conduct more naval exercises in more places and with more types of weapons systems than ever before. In the future, Chinese and Russian maritime drills will likely encompass new locations, capabilities, and partners-including possibly the Arctic, hypersonic delivery systems, and novel African, Asian, and Middle East partners-as well as continue such recent innovations as conducting joint naval patrols and combined arms maritime drills. China and Russia pursue several objectives through their bilateral naval cooperation. The Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation lacks a mutual defense clause, but does provide for consultations about common threats. The naval exercises, which rehearse non-traditional along with traditional missions (e.g., counter-piracy and humanitarian relief as well as with high-end warfighting), provide a means to enhance their response to such mutual challenges through coordinated military activities. Though the exercises may not realize substantial interoperability gains regarding combat capabilities, the drills do highlight to foreign audiences the Sino-Russian capacity to project coordinated naval power globally. This messaging is important given the reliance of China and Russia on the world's oceans for trade and the two countries' maritime territorial disputes with other countries. The exercises can also improve their national military capabilities as well as help them learn more about the tactics, techniques, and procedures of each other. The rising Chinese Navy especially benefits from working with the Russian armed forces, which have more experience conducting maritime missions, particularly in combat operations involving multiple combat arms, than the People's Liberation Army (PLA). On the negative side, these exercises, by enhancing their combat capabilities, may make Chinese and Russian policymakers more willing to employ military force or run escalatory risks in confrontations with other states. All these impacts are amplified in Northeast Asia, where the Chinese and Russian navies conduct most of their joint exercises. Northeast Asia has become an area of intensifying maritime confrontations involving China and Russia against the United States and Japan, with South Korea situated uneasily between them. The growing ties between the Chinese and Russian navies have complicated South Korean-U.S. military planning, diverted resources from concentrating against North Korea, and worsened the regional security environment. Naval planners in the United States, South Korea, and Japan will increasingly need to consider scenarios involving both the Chinese and Russian navies. For example, South Korean and U.S. policymakers need to prepare for situations in which coordinated Chinese and Russian military aggression overtaxes the Pentagon, obligating the South Korean Navy to rapidly backfill for any U.S.-allied security gaps that arise on the Korean Peninsula. Potentially reinforcing Chinese and Russian naval support to North Korea in a maritime confrontation with South Korea and its allies would present another serious challenge. Building on the commitment of Japan and South Korea to strengthen security ties, future exercises involving Japan, South Korea, and the United States should expand to consider these potential contingencies.

  • PDF