• Title/Summary/Keyword: 이공계 기피

Search Result 46, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

이공계 기피현상 어떻게 대처할 것인가

  • 한국과학기술단체총연합회
    • The Science & Technology
    • /
    • v.35 no.7 s.398
    • /
    • pp.43-65
    • /
    • 2002
  • [위기론의 함축적 의미] 과학교육 낙후성과 질 저하가 더 큰 문제, 바람직한 과학문화교육 국가 성패 좌우/[현황과 문제] 정책 큰 틀속서 일목요연하게 추진해야, 시스템 잘 작동하는 일이 대우보다 중요/[선진국은 이렇게 대처하고 있다] '이과 기피' 잘 사는 나라에서 일반적 현상, 과학교육 강화위한 교육혁신 조치해야/[정부의 대처방안] 인력양성과 활용시스템 구축이 급선무, 청소년 이공계 진출 촉진대책 마련 착수/[초ㆍ중ㆍ고 과학교육개선책] 과학전담부서 부활ㆍ연구센터 신설 시급, 재정확충ㆍ과학실험 여건 개선 선행돼야/[대학과학교육 개선책] '교수 연구몰두'-교육 등한시 큰 문제, 흥미끌 다양한 교과개편ㆍ교재개발 절실/[종합대책] 과학기술만 있고 과학문화 없는게 문제, 청소년 자신 과학기술 선호케 만들어야

  • PDF

과학자를 '매스컴 스타'로 만들자

  • Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies
    • The Science & Technology
    • /
    • no.10 s.413
    • /
    • pp.96-99
    • /
    • 2003
  • 파격적 R&D투자 아끼지 말자!/ '흥미있는 과학교육' 실천 앞서야/ 성실한 학창 시설의 중요성 강조돼야/ "이공계 기피! 그대로 두는 것이 더 좋은 방안"

  • PDF

Differentiated Community of Scientists and Engineers in Korea (이공계 기피 논의를 통해 본 한국 과학기술자 사회의 특성)

  • Lee, Eun-Kyoung
    • Journal of Science and Technology Studies
    • /
    • v.6 no.2 s.12
    • /
    • pp.77-102
    • /
    • 2006
  • This paper analyzes shaping of the discourse of "avoidance of S&T" throughout 2002 in Korea and main ideas on it and argues that the Korean S&T community is not homogeneous. The Korean S&T community consists of many subgroups with different interest mainly according to the institutions where they work as well as their specialties, qualifications, and tasks. The discourse of avoidance of S&T" was begun with the first notice of the rapid decrease in applications of Korean SAT for S&T majors in the middle of 2001. The decrease was interpreted as a warning sign of the avoidance of S&T among teenagers and developed into the avalanche of discussions on the causes of such rapid decrease around the end of the year. However, through 2002, the "avoidance of S&T' was developed into a general policy agenda covering most of problems in S&T, not just a teenagers' issue any more. Many scientists and engineers claimed that their own difficulties and problems be the main causes of the "avoidance of S&T". In the name of measures to overcome the avoidance, they requested the government to solve their problems and to accept their demands. Those claims varied from group to group. Some of them were shared among all scientists and engineers; some of them were criticized by other groups with different interest in it; some of them did not get any attention of other groups. Scientists and engineers seemed to have no idea on cooperative strategy to draw positive response to their requests from the government.

  • PDF