• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.451-452
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 대전광역시의회를 중심으로 제5기 지방의정을 평가하고 문제점을 규명하여 발전방안을 모색하고자 한다. 대전광역시의회 의원들에 의정활동에 대한 객관적 평가 자료로는 주민대표기능(득표율), 의결기능(회기운영, 안건처리), 입법기능(조례안제정, 개정 및 폐지), 견제 감시기능(행정감사, 시정질의, 예산결산안), 기타의정기능(연수, 연찬, 건의 결의문, 주민참여)등의 내용을 수집하여 분석하였다.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.2 s.33
• /
• pp.179-195
• /
• 2006

의약학적존재화발전인소유내재인소(?約學的存在和發展因素有內在因素), 내재인소리유학문본신적특수이론계통(內在因素里有學問本身的特殊理論系統), 함유혼풍부적과학의의(涵有婚豊富的科學意義), 임상치료효과(臨床治療效果), 병인적신뢰등(病人的信賴等). 외재인소리유정치(外在因素里有政治), 정책(政策), 경제(經濟), 문화방면등등(文化方面等等). 저반인소중의학정책적영향시최직접화결정성적(著般因素中?學政策的影向是最直接和決定性的). 병차의학정책적직접인소리유의약방면유관적제도(幷且?學政策的直接因素里有?約方面有?的制度), 정책(政策), 법평등(法平等), 간접인소리유국가전장제도(間接因素里有國家典章制度), 국가방침화정책등(國歌方針和政策等). 재고대봉건사회상정책적개념시국가(在古代封建社會上政策的槪念是國家), 정당재특정역사시기상위료실현노선화임무(政?在特定歷史時期上爲了悉現路善和任務), 규정적행동준칙(規定的行動准則), 비여선황제적소(比如宣皇帝的沼), 령(領), 칙(勅), 유급정부적각중정령등(愉及政府的各?政領等). 본논문시대한한의학원전학회지상기고적(本論文是大韓韓?學原典學會指上寄稿的)[관우진한시기의정사연구(?于秦漢時基?政史硏究)]상여천명(上如闡明), 통과화중국량준교수공동연구적연속적연구결과(通過和中國梁畯敎授共同硏究的連續的硏究結果). 지우위진남북조시기적의정사(至于魏晉南北朝試期的?政史), 논자관우위진남북조정치개요(?者?于魏晉南北朝政治槪要), 의약정책(?約政策), 의정조직적초보구조(?政組織的初步柩?), 의약정책화의약발전관계(?約政策和?約發展關系), 관우의정평가와형성원인등분성오개방면후(?于?政?伽和形成原因等分成五介方面后), 진행연구병정리보고기결과(進行硏究幷整理報告基結果).

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.2 s.33
• /
• pp.163-178
• /
• 2006

향의약학영향료직접효력적의약정책급위료관철적양정책입적의약조직기구화각충의약사병제도등(向?約學影向了直接效歷的?約政策及危了關鐵的洋政策立的?約組織紀柩和各忠?約事?制度等), 도시현대의정관리화약정관리체계적구성부분(都是現代?政管理和約政管理?系的柩成部分). 의정관리화약정관리도보건복지적중요구성부분(?政管理和約政管理都保健福祉的重要柩成部分). 의정화약정책명사개념자동근현대개시사용적(?政和約政策名?槪念自洞近現代開始使用的), 불과본논문상언급적개념도시왕조사회적내용(不過本?文上言及的槪念都是王朝社會的內容). 진관왕조사회몰용의정화약정저명사개념(進管王朝社會沒用?政和約政這名?槪念). 단시여현대적의정화약정개념차불다일양(但是?現代的?政和約政槪念差不多一洋). 유이본논문상용현대적‘의정’개념개전연구(由而本?文上用現代的‘?政’槪念開展硏究), 관우재왕조사회상의정병기영향의학발전(?于在王朝社會上?政幷基影響?學發展). 논자최근화중국양준교수합작병진행관우자종진한시대도청조적의정사공동연구(?者最近和中國梁畯敎授合作幷進行?于自種秦漢時代到淸朝的?政史共同硏究), 파타당작기근향후한의학유관적아국정책급교육(把?當作基根向后韓?學有?的我國政策及敎育), 보건행정등방면상(保健行政等方面上), 반망활용이참고자료(盼望活用以參考資料). 본몬문시저반연구작업제일두서(本論文是疽般硏究作業第一斗緖), 지우자종형성중국최초통일국가적진조도한조적의정사(至于自種形成中國最初統一國家的秦朝到漢朝的?政史), 진한적정책개요(秦漢的政策槪要), 진한의약정책(秦漢?約政策), 관우의정기구진한의관제도적작용(?于?政肌柩秦漢?官制度的作用), 진한의약정책화의약발전관계(秦漢?約政策和?約發展?系), 진한의정평가화형성원인등분성오개방면후(秦漢?政?伽和形成原因等分成五介方面后), 진행연구병정리보고기결과(進行硏究幷整理報告基結果).

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.65-99
• /
• 2006

송대통치자희환의약병중견의학적발전. 축소궁정의료궤구(縮小宮廷醫療机構), 각확대평민의료여의약유관적자선궤구이개선백성의료조건적정책방향흔진보적. 장의적엄범지수집, 교정(校訂), 편찬(編纂), 반포이수존의학문헌(頒布以收存醫學文獻), 병차위의학적전파화보급작출봉헌. ${\ulcorner}$내경(內經)${\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}$상한(傷寒)${\lrcorner}$ 등기초이론적연구방면상야운용(等基礎理論的硏究方面上也運用), 금원시기성위료학술쟁론적기출, 저시송대의정상최성공적정책(這是宋代醫政上最成功的政策). 유정부엄구약물, 수정본초병건립제약공창화약점(修訂本草幷建立製藥工廠和約店), 전매약물(專賣藥物), 개혁제형, 이발전'성약'(以發展'成葯'), 통일용약적규범등(統一用藥的范等), 저양적조시향약물적발전화의약적민중화흔대적영향. 의약교육방면상(醫藥敎育方面上), 재태의국화국자감리건립적'의학'교육제도유흔다건공, 궤구적예속, 전과(專科) 적분과(的分科), 고시제도(考試制度), 학교관리등도적료신경험(學校管理等都積了新驗), 의학상이'삼사법'(醫學上以'三舍法') '공액'위려의학교육적조시('貢額'爲勵醫學敎育的措施), 저치득긍정적(這値得肯定的). 송대의학교육상야유과착(宋代醫學敎育上也有過錯). 비여(譬如), 인제도적존폐이유실교육적연속성(因制度的存廢而有失敎育的連續性), 이방애의약교육경금적척축화계승(以妨碍醫藥敎育經驗的積蓄和繼承), 불단결핍잠력, 상실동력이차몰건립전문약학교육(喪失動力而且沒建立專門藥學敎育). 대부분수요의정궤구적건립(大部分需要醫政机構的建立). 단시유례속관사흔옹제적문제, 인위피상부소속궤관소견체소이불구통일적지도화협조, 최고의정궤구'한임의관원'야몰유통제의약궤구적권한(最高醫政机構'翰林醫官院'也沒有統制醫藥机構的權限), 직책중복(職責重複), 인원과잉(人員過剩), 의관원본신이야유흔다과잉리인원, 부구엄격적관리제도. 인비송대의관관리방면상강락료총효율(因比宋代醫官管理方面上降落了總效率).

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.123-152
• /
• 2018

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2020

• Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.126-135
• /
• 2012

Republic of Korea designates a waste disposal site within the fishing zone administered jointly with Chin in the Yellow Sea. The issue of waste disposal at sea is subject to the 1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter commonly called London Protocol. China, one of the contracting parties declared that if China becomes a party to a dispute concerning the interpretation and application of the Protocol, the Arbitral procedure of the Protocol shall only be applied with written consent of the Government of China according to the Article 16.5 of the Protocol at the time of its accession. The Article allows any State may declare that, when it is a party to dispute about the interpretation or application of precautionary approach or polluter pay principle, its consent will be required before the dispute may be settled by means of the Arbitral procedure of the Protocol. This paper analyzes the legal basis of Chinese declaration and its implication to parties that may be in dispute with China using international precedents of similar nature and a game theory.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.149-170
• /
• 2012

The United Nations Climate Change Conference, Durban 2011, ended on December 12, 2011, 36 hours over its schedule, delivering the Durban Package, which consisted of, inter alia, the extension of the period for Kyoto Protocol term and the launch of Ad-hoc working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Despite the positive progress made in Durban, the future of post-2012 climate regime still seems cloudy. Before the Durban conference, some of Annex I countries with emissions reduction commitment under the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period openly declared their intention not to participate in the second one, reducing the effectiveness of Durban agreement. Parties to the conference have a long list of difficult issues disturbing the materialization of the new legal agreement in 2020 such as level of mitigation targets of individual countries and legal nature of their commitment. Given this uncertainty, the Korean government should reinforce its domestic climate policies rather than settling in the fact that it remains as a non-Annex I county party under the Durban Agreement due to the extension of the Kyoto Protocol period. Domestically, it needs to continue to raise the public awareness for rigorous climate policies to transit its economy to low carbon pathway which reduces the country's dependency on fossil fuel in the long term. It is also important to implement cost effective climate policies to cope with domestic resistance and international competitiveness. Internationally, its priority would be working for trust-building in the on-going negotiation meetings to encourage meaningful participation of all parties.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.39-57
• /
• 2012

Analysis of the economic impact on Korean bioindustry companies was approached after Korea access to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter 'the Protocol') enters into force. Cost analysis of the economic impact is based on the size of bioindustry market, dependency ratio on genetic resources abroad, ABS (Access and Benefit Sharing) ratio for royalty ratio. Korean bioindustry companies would have had to pay extra ABS cost around 1.3-6.0 billion won for using genetic resources abroad, if the Protocol had entered into force in 2009. And this cost is estimated to be around 13.6 - 63.9 billion won in 2015. All ABS costs account only about less than 0.01% of total Korean bioindustry volume of target years. These show us that joining the Protocol will not significantly impact the bioindustry market in Korea. If the Protocol enters into force, genetic resources users have to pay PIC (Prior Informed Consent) and MAT (Mutually Agreed Terms) cost before accessing the genetic resources outside of their country, regardless of the accession status of the country. This ABS costs and terms on provided genetic resources will be determined by compliance between genetic resources users and providers. As a genetic resources provider, Korean bioindustry companies will have advantage over technology transfer agreements, royalties, licensing agreements, and taxes on profits from patents including traditional knowledge. Also, Korean bioindustry companies are expected to get various socio-economic benefits such as patent litigation and regulatory proceedings as a genetic resources provider. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of the Protocol that Korean bioindustry companies will face together, the socio-economic impact of the Nagoya Protocol on Korean bioindustry companies is negligible regardless of the accession status of Korea to the Nagoya Protocol.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.161-190
• /
• 2014

The Nagoya Protocol will enter into force on 12 October, 2014 during the period of UNCBD COP12 which will be held in Pyeongchang, Korea. In this circumstance, it is essential to analyze other countries' legislations and find various related issues. Based on that analysis, Korea can set its course for related policies and also improve its own legislations. EU and China were selected as comparison countries since EU is one of the leading countries trying to establish an international environmental law system and China is regarded as a model country representing LMMC (Like-Minded Mega-diverse Countries) in the world. Based on this study, it is highly recommended for Korea to assert the need for dispute resolution between private and government parties and also trilateral co-management of trans-boundary genetic resources and related traditional knowledge among Korea, China and Japan. In addition, Korea also needs to improve its legislation towards integrating the management and control of genetic resources.