• Title/Summary/Keyword: 의견 청취 경험

Search Result 4, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

The Influence of Experience to be Heard in the Home and School Settings and Self-esteem on the Human Rights Awareness in Middle and High School Students: Differences in Human Rights Education (중고등학생의 가정 및 학교에서 의견 청취 경험, 자아존중감이 인권 인식에 미치는 영향: 인권교육에 따른 차이 검증)

  • Oh, Hyemin;Kim, Sangwon;Lee, Yanghee
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.422-434
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study aims to explore the structural relationships among experiences of being heard in home and school settings, self-esteem, and human rights awareness. Among the 2017 NYPI Cross-sectional Survey on the Rights of Youth & Children, 6,405 middle and high school students (47.8% females) were used to conduct a structural equation modeling using Mplus. It was found that children who experience being heard in the home or school display higher levels of self-esteem and awareness of human rights. It was also found that self-esteem is more likely to increase awareness of human rights. Self-esteem was also found to mediate the pathway between the experience of being heard at home or school and human rights awareness. In addition, there was no significant difference in path coefficients depending on whether they received human rights education. Practical implications for promoting home and school environments where children's opinions can be heard were discussed.

구전커뮤니케이션을 통한 정보탐색에 관한 연구

  • 이민상;심완섭
    • Proceedings of the Korean DIstribution Association Conference
    • /
    • 1999.11a
    • /
    • pp.249-270
    • /
    • 1999
  • 소비자들은 구매의사결정 시에 불확실성이나 위험을 직면하게 되는 데, 이를 최소화 시키는 방안의 하나로 구매의사결정을 하기 전에 정보를 수집하고 탐색행동을 수행하게 된다. 정보탐색 노력은 크게 두 가지 수준으로 구분할 수 있다. 즉, 단순히 자신의 과거 제품사용 경험에 의존하는 소극적인 내부정보 탐색 노력 수준과 판매점 방문, 광고매체의 정보탐색, 주변사람의 의견청취 등 적극적인 외부 정보탐색 노력 수준으로 나뉘어 진다. (중략)

  • PDF

Public Libraries' Response to COVID-19 Pandemic and Expected Roles in Upcoming Disasters: A Case Study of South Korea (국내 공공도서관의 코로나19 팬데믹 관련 대응 및 재난발생시 기대되는 역할 연구)

  • Hanseul Lee
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.54 no.4
    • /
    • pp.205-228
    • /
    • 2023
  • In 2020, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) struck the world. This study examined Korean public libraries' responses during the COVID-19 pandemic to determine their working practices, service patterns, applied strategies, and roles played. The study administered an online survey to 317 public librarians in South Korea. The results indicated that librarians reported significant transitions regarding the services provided. However, only 15.5% of the survey respondents reported that they had experienced trainings/workshops for library staff members. Survey participants also identified challenges such as the limitations of non-face-to-face services, complaints from library patrons, and overwork due to epidemic prevention. When it comes to the expected roles of public libraries in upcoming disasters, the study contends that information providers, who guide the public through various information resources, would play the most critical role. An analysis of a few open-ended questions' answers proliferated the highlighted findings. Based on the key findings, this paper also discussed implications for information professionals and future research.

A Study on the Importance and Priorities of the Investment Determinants of Startup Accelerators (스타트업 액셀러레이터 투자결정요인의 중요도 및 우선순위에 대한 연구)

  • Heo, Joo-yeun
    • Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
    • /
    • v.15 no.6
    • /
    • pp.27-42
    • /
    • 2020
  • Startup accelerators have emerged as new investment entities that help early startups, which are not easy to survive continuously due to lack of funds, commercialization capabilities, and experiences. As their positive performance on early startups and the ecosystem has been proven, the number of early startups which want to receive their investment is also increasing. However, they are vaguely preparing to attract accelerators' investment because they do not have any information on what factors the accelerators consider important. In addition, researches on startup accelerators are also at an early level, so there are no remarkable prior studies on factors that decide on investment. Therefore, this study aims to help startups prepare for investment attraction by looking at what factors are important for accelerators to invest, and to provide meaningful implications to academia. In the preceding study, we derived five upper level categories, 26 lower level accelerators' investment determinants through the qualitative meta-synthesis method, secondary data analysis, observation on US accelerators and in-depth interviews. In this study, we want to derive important implications by deriving priorities of the accelerators' investment determinants. Therefore, we used AHP that are evaluated as the suitable methodology for deriving importance and priority. The analysis results show that accelerators value market-related factors most. This means that startups that are subject to investment by accelerators are early-stage startups, and many companies have not fully developed their products or services. Therefore, market-related factors that can be evaluated objectively seem to be more important than products (or services) that are still ambiguous. Next, it was found that the factors related to the internal workforce of startups are more important. Since accelerators want to develop their businesses together with start-ups and team members through mentoring, ease of collaboration with them is very important, which seems to be important. The overall priority analysis results of the 26 investment determinants show that 'customer needs' and 'founders and team members' understanding of customers and markets' (0.62) are important and high priority factors. The results also show that startup accelerators consider the customer-centered perspective very important. And among the factors related to startups, the most prominent factor was the founder's openness and execution ability. Therefore, it can be confirmed that accelerators consider the ease of collaboration with these startups very important.