• Title/Summary/Keyword: 윈드큐브 라이다

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Comparative Validation of WindCube LIDAR and Scintec SODAR for Wind Resource Assessment - Remote Sensing Campaign at Jamsil (풍력자원평가용 윈드큐브 라이다와 씬텍 소다의 비교.검증 - 잠실 원격탐사 캠페인)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Kim, Dong-Hyuk;Jeon, Wan-Ho;Choi, Hyun-Jeong
    • New & Renewable Energy
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-50
    • /
    • 2011
  • The only practical way to measure wind resource at high-altitude over 100 m above ground for a feasibility study on a high-rise building integrated wind turbine might be ground-based remote sensing. The remote-sensing campaign was performed at a 145 m-building roof in Jamsil where is a center of metropolitan city Seoul. The campaign aimed uncertainty assessment of Leosphere WindCube LIDAR and Scintec MPAS SODAR through a mutual comparison. Compared with LIDAR, the data availability of SODAR was about 2/3 at 550 m altitude while both showed over 90% under 400 m, and it is shown that the data availability decrease may bring a distortion of statistical analysis. The wind speed measurement of SODAR was fitted to a slope of 0.92 and $R^2$ of 0.90 to the LIDAR measurement. The relative standard deviation of wind speed difference and standard deviation of wind direction difference were evaluated to be 30% and 20 degrees, respectively over the whole measurement heights.

Comparative Validation of WindCube LIDAR and Remtech SODAR for Wind Resource Assessment - Remote Sensing Campaign at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (풍력자원평가용 윈드큐브 라이다와 렘텍 소다의 비교.검증 - 포항가속기 원격탐사 캠페인)

  • Kim, Hyun-Goo;Chyng, Chin-Wha;An, Hae-Joon;Ji, Yeong-Mi
    • Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.63-71
    • /
    • 2011
  • The remote-sensng campaign was performed at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory where is located in a basin 6km inland from Yeongil Bay. The campaign aimed uncertainty assessment of Remtech PA0 SODAR through a mutual comparison with WindCube LIDAR, the remote-sensing equipment for wind resource assessment. The joint observation was carried out by changing the setup for measurement heights three times over two months. The LIDAR measurement was assumed as the reference and the uncertainty of SODAR measurement was quantitatively assessed. Compared with LIDAR, the data availability of SODAR was about half. The wind speed measurement was fitted to a slope of 0.94 and $R^2$ of 0.79 to the LIDAR measurement. However, the relative standard deviation was about 17% under 150m above ground level. Therefore, the Remtech PA0 SODAR is judged to be unsuitable for the evaluation of wind resource assessment and wind turbine performance test, which require accuracy of measurement.