• 제목/요약/키워드: 외상중증도

검색결과 99건 처리시간 0.018초

단순 외상팀 활성화 조건이 중증 외상 환자의 치료 결과에 미치는 영향 (Effectiveness of Simple Trauma Team Activation Criteria on Prognosis of Severe Trauma Patients)

  • 이동건;이강현;차경철;박경혜;최한주;김현;황성오
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.71-76
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the outcome of the after trauma team (AfterTT) group to the before trauma team (BeforeTT) group. Methods: All trauma patients who visited to emergency room (ER) between July 1, 2006 and February 29,2008 based on trauma registry, with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or GCS < 9 were included in this study. We compared the amount of packed RBC transfusion, the ER stay time, the ER visit to CT evaluation time, the ER visit to operation time, the length of ICU stay, the length of hospital admission and the survival discharge rate between the AfterTT group and the BeforeTT group. Patients with brain injuries had little chance of survival. Burn patients, who visited the ER 24 hours after injury and patients who were dead on arrival (DOA) were excluded from this study. Results: Total of 93 patients were included in this study: 42 in the AfterTT group and 51 in the BeforeTT group. The AfterTT group and the Before TT group showed no differences in Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and mean age. The amount of packed RBC transfusion was lower in the AfterTT group, but no statistically significant difference was noted (AfterTT 11${\pm}$11units, BeforeTT 16${\pm}$15units, p=0.136). The ER visit to operation time was shorter in the AfterTT group, but there were no statistically significant difference between the groups (AfterTT 251${\pm}$223 minutes, BeforeTT 486${\pm}$460 minutes, p=0.082). The length of ICU stay was shorter in the AfterTT group, but the difference was not statistically significant (AfterTT 11${\pm}$12 days, Before TT 15${\pm}$30 days, p=0.438). The length of Hospital admission was shorter in the AfterTT group (AfterTT 43${\pm}$37 days, BeforeTT 68${\pm}$70 days, p=0.032), but this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Simple Trauma team activation criteria decreased the amount of packed RBC transfusion and the hospital admission duration. Hemodynamic instability (SBP < 90 mmHg) and decreased mental state (GCS<9) are good indices for activating the trauma team.

다발성 중증 외상 환자들의 치료에 대한 응급 외상팀 운영의 효과 (Effect of the Emergency Trauma Team's Management on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Severe Trauma)

  • 이성화;조석주;염석란;류지호;정진우;한상균;김용인;박맹렬;김영대
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.172-178
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: We performed this study to determine how the emergency trauma team affects the treatment of patients with multiple severe trauma and to discuss the effect and the direction of the emergency trauma team's management. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 518 patients who visited our emergency department with severe trauma from August 2006 to July 2008. We divided the severe trauma patients into 2 groups : patients before and after trauma team management (Group 1 and Group 2). Then, we compared demographic characteristics, mechanisms of injury, and treatment outcomes (lengths of stay in the ED, admission ratio, and in-hospital mortality) between the 2 groups. In the same way, patients with multiple severe trauma were divided into 2 groups, that are patients before and after trauma team management (Group 3 and Group 4) and analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference, except mean age, between groups 1 and 2. In group 4 patients, compared to group 3 patients, the lengths of stay in the ED were lower (p value < 0.001), and the admission ratio were higher (p value = 0.017), but there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality between the groups 3 and 4. Conclusion: When patients with multiple severe trauma visit the ED, the emergency trauma team' management can decrease the lengths of stay in the ED and increase the admission ratio, but does not produce a decrease in the in-hospital mortality rate. Further investigations of emergency trauma team management are needed to improve treatment outcomes for patients with multiple severe trauma.

다발성 외상으로 유발된 급성호흡부전증후군 환자에서 정맥-정맥동맥 체외막 산화기(ECMO)의 적용 - 1예 보고 - (Application of Veno-venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Multitrauma Patient with ARDS - A case report -)

  • 이성준;지현근;황재준;김준석;이송암;김진식
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.104-107
    • /
    • 2010
  • 급성호흡부전증후군은 치료가 어렵고 치명율이 높다. 인공호흡기 치료에 반응하지 않는 중증의 경우 체외막 산화기(Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO)가 적용되고 있다. 교통사고로 다발성 외상을 받은 21세 여자가 흉부 방사선상 양측폐에 심한 침윤 소견과 동맥혈가스 검사상 급성호흡부전증후군(Acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS)으로 판단되어 정맥동맥 체외산화기(Veno- arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, VA ECMO) 치료를 시작하였다. ECMO 적용 2일째 흉부 방사선상 폐 침윤 소견 악화되면서 동맥혈 산소 포화도(Systemic oxygen saturation, $SaO_2$)가 85% 미만으로 저하되었다. 이에 중추신경계와 폐의 산소화를 향상시키기 위해 ECMO의 유출로에 곁회로를 이용하여 우측 경정맥에 연결하여 정맥-정맥동맥 ECMO (Veno-venoarterial ECMO, V-VA ECMO)로 전환하였고 이후 동맥혈 산소 분압($PaO_2$) 65 mmHg, $SaO_2$ 94%로 향상되었다. V-VA ECMO로의 전환은 전신에 산소 공급을 늘리기 위해 고려해 볼 수 있는 방법으로 생각된다.

늑골골절 환자 치료: 결과에 영향을 주는 위험인자 분석 (Management of Patients with Rib Fractures: Analysis of the Risk Factors Affecting the Outcome)

  • 김한용;김명영
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • 제43권3호
    • /
    • pp.285-291
    • /
    • 2010
  • 배경: 흉부외상은 개발도상국인 나라에서 이환율과 사망률의 가장 많은 원인 중에 하나이다. 흉부둔상으로 발생하는 늑골골절은 외상의 중증도를 나타내는 중요한 지표이다. 연구의 목적은 늑골 골절을 치료시 이환율과 사망률을 확인 하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2002년 5월부터 2008년 12월까지 입원 후 3일 이내 타 병원으로 전원을 간 환자를 제외한 둔상으로 인한 늑골골절이 발생한 환자를 대상으로 후향적으로 연구하였다. 이 기간 동안 474명이 입원하였고, 454명이 연구에 포함되었다. 남자가 356명 여자가 9명이었고 평균나이는 53세(5~90세)였다. 결과를 예측하는 요소로 손상기전, 늑골 골절수, 중환자실 입원기간 그리고 ISS, 입원기간, 폐 합병증과 사망률을 조사 하였다. 결과: 외상의 기전으로 교통사고 189명(41.7%), 보행 중 넘어짐 103명(22.7%), 추락 85명(18.7%) 그리고 농기계 사고 30명(6.6%), 산업재해 32명(7.0%), 폭행 15명(3.3%)였다. 흉부내 손상으로 혈흉 269명(59.3%), 기흉 144명(31.7%) 폐좌상 95명(20.9%) 그리고 피하기종 29명(6.4%), 큰 혈관손상 5명(0.1%)이 있었다. 대부분의 환자는 보존적인 치료를 하였고, 흉관 삽관술 시행은 234명(51.5%)이었으며, 개흉술은 18명(4.0%)이었다. 평균 흉관삽관 기간은 $5.2{\pm}6.2$일이었다. 대부분의 환자는 일반 병동에서 치료를 하였으며, 평균 입원기간은 $22.5{\pm}20$일이었다. 평균 ISS 수치는 $14.8{\pm}10.9$ (3~75)였고 사망률은 4.9% (22명)였다. 입원기간에 영향을 주는 것은 늑골골절 수, 흉관삽관 기간, 폐질환 동반 그리고 산재보험 이었고, 사망에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 폐좌상, ISS가 예후에 영향을 주는 주요한 요인이었다. 결론: 늑골 골절은 중증손상을 나타내는 지표이다. 합병증과 동반된 손상 때문에 늑골골절 환자들은 입원하여 치료하는 것이 좋다고 생각한다. 최근의 연구에서 40대 이하의 젊은 환자도 노년층의 환자와 같이 늑골골절로 인한 이환율과 사망률이 증가 한다고 한다. 우리의 연구에서는 ISS와 페좌상이 사망률에 영향을 주고 있다. 늑골골절이 1개 또는 이상인 늑골 골절만 있는 환자도 입원치료를 하는 것이 좋을 것으로 생각 한다.

중증 뇌손상이 없는 둔상 환자에서 초기 중증도 예측인자로서 D-dimer의 역할 (Initial D-dimer level as early prognostic tool in blunt trauma patients without significant brain injury)

  • 손석우;이재백;진영호;정태오;조시온;이정문;윤재철;김소은
    • 대한응급의학회지
    • /
    • 제29권5호
    • /
    • pp.430-436
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not the d-dimer level indicating hyperfibrinolysis could be a predictor of early poor outcome (massive transfusion, death within 24 hours) associated with trauma-induced coagulopathy in blunt trauma without significant brain injury. Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study using 516 blunt trauma patients without significant brain injury. The poor outcome group, including patients receiving massive transfusion and those who died within 24 hours, consisted of 33 patients (6.4%). The variables were compared between the poor outcome group and good outcome group, and logistic regression analysis was performed using statistically significant variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the poor outcome prediction ability of the initial d-dimer level. Results: The poor outcome group showed more serious anatomical, physiological, and laboratory data than the good outcome group. In the ROC curve analysis for evaluation of the poor outcome prediction of the d-dimer level, the area under the curve value was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.90) while the cut-off value was 27.35 mg/L. In the logistic regression analysis, the high d-dimer level was shown to be an independent predictor of poor outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 14.87; 95% CI, 2.96-74.67). Conclusion: The high d-dimer level (>27.35 mg/L) can be used as a predictor for the poor outcome of patients with blunt trauma without significant brain injury.

응급의료전달체계의 각 요인이 중증외상환자의 예후에 미치는 영향 분석 (Prognostic Factor, for Major Trauma Patients in the Emergency Medical Service System)

  • 임득호;정태녕;이창재;진수근;김의중;최성욱;김옥준
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.89-94
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: A few studies have assessed the factors affecting the prognoses for major trauma patients and those improving the circumstances when dealing with the trauma system. In that light, we analyzed factors, such as pre-hospital factors, the time to admission, the length of stay in the emergency department (ED) and emergency operation, influencing the outcomes for trauma patients. Methods: The patients who visited our emergency department from April 1, 2009, to February 29, 2011, due to major trauma were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criterion was a revised trauma score (RTS) < 7 or injury severity score (ISS) ${\geq}$ 16. We used reviews of medical records, to analyze each step of emergency medical care with respect to patients' sex, age, visit time and visit date. Continuous variables were described as a median with an interquartile range, and we compared the variables between the survival and the mortality groups by using the Mann-Whitney U test. Fisher's exact test was used for nominal variables. Using the variables that showed statistical significance in univariate comparisons, we performed a logistic regression analysis, and we tested the model's adequacy by the using the Hosmer-Lemeshow method. Results: A total of 261 patients with major trauma satisfied either the RTS score criterion or the ISS score criterion. Excluding 12 patients with missing data, 249 patients were included in this study. The overall mortality rate was 16.9%. Time to ED arrival, time to admission, time of ED stay, RTS, ISS, and visit date being a holiday showed statistically significant differences between the survival and the mortality groups in the univariate analysis. RTS, ISS, length of ED stay, and visit date being a holiday showed statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The mortality rate did not show a significant relationship with the time to ED arrival, use of 119, on time to admission. Rather, it elicited a quite significant correlation with the trauma scoring system (RTS and ISS), the time of ED stay, and the visit date being a holiday.

대학병원 응급의료센터로 전원되는 중증 외상환자의 현황 및 문제점 (Problems with Transferring Major Trauma Patients to Emergency Medical Center of a University Hospital from Another Medical Center)

  • 한상수;정경원;권준식;김지영;최상천;이국종
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.118-124
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: The incidence of multiple trauma is increasing nowadays and is the leading cause of death among young adults. Initial treatment is well known to be crucial in multiple trauma victims. However, many indiscriminate transfers occur due to the lack of a well-organized trauma system in Korea. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the current serious state in which major trauma patients are transferred to the Emergency Medical Center of a university hospital from another medical center. Methods: From November 2009 to October 2010, we performed a retrospective study to analyze the characteristics of patients who visited the Ajou University Medical Center located in Gyeonggi-do. We evaluated the ISS (injury severity score), and a score over 15 point was identified as major trauma. The major trauma patients were separated into two groups according to the visit route, and the characteristics of each group were analyzed. Results: Among the 88,862 patients who visited to the Emergency Medical Center, trauma patients accounted for 19,950, and 343 of them were evaluated as major trauma patients. Among the 343 patients, 170 patients had been transferred from other medical centers. The proportion of males to females was 3.3:1, and the mean ISS was 22.7. The leading cause of trauma was motor vehicle accidents. Of the total 170 patients, 77.6% were admitted to the Intensive care unit and 36.3% underwent surgery. The 170 patients that had been transferred to our medical center, 78.8% were transferred from Gyeonggi-do, 15.3% were transferred from other regions, and 5.9% were miscellaneous. Conclusion: Almost half of the major trauma victims treat at our medical center had been transferred from other medical centers. Establishing a traumatic system, supported by well-organized trauma centers and emergency medical services, that can reduce inappropriate transfers among medical facilities is essential.

응급중환자실에서의 중증외상환자 치료 (Management of Severe Trauma Patients in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit)

  • 김지주;서길준;정기영;권운용;김경수;이휘재;김영철;최석호;이영호;이경학;한국남;제환준;김효철
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제24권2호
    • /
    • pp.98-104
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the trauma care system of our hospital, in which emergency physicians care for major trauma patients in the emergency intensive care unit (ICU) in consultation with intervention radiologists and surgeons. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted in an emergency ICU of a tertiary referral hospital. We enrolled consecutive patients who had been admitted to our emergency ICU with major trauma from March 2007 to September 2010. We collected data with respect to demographic findings, mechanisms of injury, the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), emergency surgery, angiographic intervention, and 6-month mortality. Then, we compared the observed and predicted survivals of the patients. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots by using 10 groups, one for each decile, of predicted mortality were used to evaluate the fitness of TRISS. P-values of greater than 0.05 represent a fair calibration. Results: Among 116 patients, 12 (10.34%) were dead within 6 months after admission to the ICU, and 29 (25.00%) and 38 (32.80%) patients received emergency surgery and angiographic intervention, respectively. The mean injury severity score and revised trauma score were $36.97{\pm}17.73$ and $7.84{\pm}6.75$, respectively. The observed survival and the predicted survival of the TRISS were 89.66% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84.03~95.28%) and 69.85% (95% CI: 63.80~75.91%), respectively. The calibration plots showed that the observed survival of our patients was consistently higher than the predicted survival of the TRISS ($p$ <0.001). Conclusion: The observed survival for the trauma care system of our hospital, in which emergency physicians care for major trauma patients in the emergency ICU in consultation with intervention radiologists and surgeons, was higher than the predicted survival of the TRISS.

중증 외상환자에서 mesh를 이용한 일시적 수술창 봉합의 경험 (Temporary Abdominal Coverage with Malex Mesh Prosthesis in Cases of Severely Injured Abdominal Trauma Patients)

  • 김연우;정용식;김욱환;민영기;김기운;이국종
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제18권1호
    • /
    • pp.70-79
    • /
    • 2005
  • Background: Abdominal compartment syndrome has multiple etiologies that are not only related to trauma but also any problem condition in the absence of abdominal injury. To determine whether prevention of the abdominal compartment syndrome after celiotomy for trauma victims justifies the use of temporary abdominal coverage with monofilament knitted polypropylene mesh (Malex mesh) in severely injured patients. Method: Medical records at the Ajou University Medical Center were reviewed for a 32-month period from May 1st, 2002 to December 31st, 2004. Twenty-nine consecutive patients requiring celiotomy who were survived until at the end of celiotomy received temporary abdominal coverage and staged abdominal repairs with Malex mesh. One of them was dissecting aortic aneurysm patient and the others were all trauma victims. Malex mesh prosthesis coverage was used in cases of abdominal compartment syndrome due to excessive fascial tension, severe bowel edema and retroperitoneal hemorrhage or edema followed by staged abdominal repairs. Result: Eighteen of twenty-nine patients were survived. Demographic characteristics, injury severity number of abdominal-pelvic bone injuries, mortality rate, complications, number of operations for permanent closure, required time for permanent closure showed no difference between man and women or child and adult. Except one dissecting aortic aneurysm patient, trauma cases showed $3.24{\pm}0.98$ injury sites. All cases that received temporary abdominal coverage and staged abdominal repairs did not show abdominal compartment syndrome. $10.08{\pm}5.85$ days and $2.27{\pm}0.82$ times of operation required making permanent abdominal closure after temporary abdominal coverage followed by staged abdominal repairs. Most of surviving patients have shown antibiotic-resistant organism and fungus infection. Patients who received permanent closure recovered from infectious problem completely. Conclusion: The use of Malex mesh for temporary abdominal coverage in severely injured patients undergoing celiotomy was effective treatment method.

현재의 국내 응급의료체계에서 중증외상환자의 이송 지연 (Delayed Transfer of Major Trauma Patients Under the Current Emergency Medical System in Korea)

  • 정경원;장정문;김지영;백숙자;송서영;강찬숙;이국종
    • Journal of Trauma and Injury
    • /
    • 제24권1호
    • /
    • pp.25-30
    • /
    • 2011
  • Purpose: Major trauma patients should be transferred to a definitive care facility as early as possible because prompt management will prevent death. This study was designed to discover the obstacles leading to delayed transfers under the current emergency medical system in Korea and whether there are any negative outcomes associated with conducting procedures at primary care hospitals prior to transferring patients to higher levels of care. Methods: The medical records of major trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score above 15 within the past year were reviewed. Patients were divided three groups as follows: (A) came directly to our emergency center, (B) were transferred without CT or MRI scan at the primary care hospital and (C) transferred with CT or MRI scans. The transfer time of each group were compared and analyzed statistically. Additionally, the number and type of imaging performed at the primary care hospital were analyzed. Results: All qualified patients (n=276) were enrolled in this study: 121 patients in group A; 104 in group B; 51 in group C. There was a statistically significant difference in the transfer time between the three groups (p-value<0.001), and 79 (28.6%) were transferred to an emergency medical center within one hour. In group C, CT or MRI scans were performed an average of 1.86 times at the primary care hospital, and the median transfer time was 4 hours 5 minutes. Conclusion: Only 28.6% of the cases in the study arrived within the golden hour at a definitive care facility. Such delays are in part the result of prolonged times at the primary care hospital for radiologic examinations, such as CT or MRI scans. Major multiple trauma patients should be transferred to a definitive care facility directly or as soon as the primary survey and the resuscitation of Advanced Trauma Life Support guideline are completed at the primary care hospital.