• 환경위생공학
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2009

We conclude the following with air pollution data measured from city measurement net administered and managed in Gwangju for the last 7 years from January in 2001 to December in 2007. In addition, some major statistics governed by Gwangju city and data administered by Gwangju as national official statistics obtained by estimating the amount of national air pollutant emission from National Institute of Environmental Research were used. The results are as follows ; 1. The distribution by main managements of air emission factory is the following ; Gwangju City Hall(67.8%) > Gwangsan District Office(13.6%) > Buk District Office(9.8%) > Seo District Office(5.5%) > Nam District Office(3.0%) > Dong District Office(0.3%) and the distribution by districts of air emission factory ; Buk District(32.8%) > Gwangsan District(22.4%) > Seo District(21.8%) > Nam District(14.9%) > Dong District(8.1%). That by types(Year 2004~2007 average) is also following ; Type 5(45.2%) > Type 4(40.7%) > Type 3(8.6%) > Type 2(3.2%) > Type 1(2.2%) and the most of them are small size of factory, Type 4 and 5. 2. The distribution by districts of the number of car registrations is the following ; Buk District(32.8%) > Gwangsan District(22.4%) > Seo District(21.8%) > Nam District(14.9%) > Dong District(8.1%) and the distribution by use of car fuel in 2001 ; Gasoline(56.3%) > Diesel(30.3%) > LPG(13.4%) > etc.(0.2%). In 2007, there was no ranking change ; Gasoline(47.8%) > Diesel(35.6%) > LPG(16.2%) >etc.(0.4%). The number of gasoline cars increased slightly, but that of diesel and LPG cars increased remarkably. 3. The distribution by items of the amount of air pollutant emission in Gwangju is the following; CO(36.7%) > NOx(32.7%) > VOC(26.7%) > SOx(2.3%) > PM-10(1.5%). The amount of CO and NOx, which are generally generated from cars, is very large percentage among them. 4. The distribution by mean of air pollutant emission(SOx, NOx, CO, VOC, PM-10) of each county for 5 years(2001~2005) is the following ; Buk District(31.0%) > Gwangsan District(28.2%) > Seo District(20.4%) > Nam District(12.5%) > Dong District(7.9%). The amount of air pollutant emission in Buk District, which has the most population, car registrations, and air pollutant emission businesses, was the highest. On the other hand, that of air pollutant emission in Dong District, which has the least population, car registrations, and air pollutant emission businesses, was the least. 5. The average rates of SOx for 5 years(2001~2005) in Gwangju is the following ; Non industrial combustion(59.5%) > Combustion in manufacturing industry(20.4%) > Road transportation(11.4%) > Non-road transportation(3.8%) > Waste disposal(3.7%) > Production process(1.1%). And the distribution of average amount of SOx emission of each county is shown as Gwangsan District(33.3%) > Buk District(28.0%) > Seo District(19.3%) > Nam District(10.2%) > Dong District(9.1%). 6. The distribution of the amount of NOx emission in Gwangju is shown as Road transportation(59.1%) > Non-road transportation(18.9%) > Non industrial combustion(13.3%) > Combustion in manufacturing industry(6.9%) > Waste disposal(1.6%) > Production process(0.1%). And the distribution of the amount of NOx emission from each county is the following ; Buk District(30.7%) > Gwangsan District(28.8%) > Seo District(20.5%) > Nam District(12.2%) > Dong District(7.8%). 7. The distribution of the amount of carbon monoxide emission in Gwangju is shown as Road transportation(82.0%) > Non industrial combustion(10.6%) > Non-road transportation(5.4%) > Combustion in manufacturing industry(1.7%) > Waste disposal(0.3%). And the distribution of the amount of carbon monoxide emission from each county is the following ; Buk District(33.0%) > Seo District(22.3%) > Gwangsan District(21.3%) > Nam District(14.3%) > Dong District(9.1%). 8. The distribution of the amount of Volatile Organic Compound emission in Gwangju is shown as Solvent utilization(69.5%) > Road transportation(19.8%) > Energy storage & transport(4.4%) > Non-road transportation(2.8%) > Waste disposal(2.4%) > Non industrial combustion(0.5%) > Production process(0.4%) > Combustion in manufacturing industry(0.3%). And the distribution of the amount of Volatile Organic Compound emission from each county is the following ; Gwangsan District(36.8%) > Buk District(28.7%) > Seo District(17.8%) > Nam District(10.4%) > Dong District(6.3%). 9. The distribution of the amount of minute dust emission in Gwangju is shown as Road transportation(76.7%) > Non-road transportation(16.3%) > Non industrial combustion(6.1%) > Combustion in manufacturing industry(0.7%) > Waste disposal(0.2%) > Production process(0.1%). And the distribution of the amount of minute dust emission from each county is the following ; Buk District(32.8%) > Gwangsan District(26.0%) > Seo District(19.5%) > Nam District(13.2%) > Dong District(8.5%). 10. According to the major source of emission of each items, that of oxides of sulfur is Non industrial combustion, heating of residence, business and agriculture and stockbreeding. And that of NOx, carbon monoxide, minute dust is Road transportation, emission of cars and two-wheeled vehicles. Also, that of VOC is Solvent utilization emission facilities due to Solvent utilization. 11. The concentration of sulfurous acid gas has been 0.004ppm since 2001 and there has not been no concentration change year by year. It is considered that the use of sulfurous acid gas is now reaching to the stabilization stage. This is found by the facts that the use of fuel is steadily changing from solid or liquid fuel to low sulfur liquid fuel containing very little amount of sulfur element or gas, so that nearly no change in concentration has been shown regularly. 12. Concerning changes of the concentration of throughout time, the concentration of NO has been shown relatively higher than that of $NO_2$ between 6AM~1PM and the concentration of $NO_2$ higher during the other time. The concentration of NOx(NO, $NO_2$) has been relatively high during weekday evenings. This result shows that there is correlation between the concentration of NOx and car traffics as we can see the Road transportation which accounts for 59.1% among the amount of NOx emission. 13. 49.1~61.2% of PM-10 shows PM-2.5 concerning the relationship between PM-10 and PM-2.5 and PM-2.5 among dust accounts for 45.4%~44.5% of PM-10 during March and April which is the lowest rates. This proves that particles of yellow sand that are bigger than the size $2.5\;{\mu}m$ are sent more than those that are smaller from China. This result shows that particles smaller than $2.5\;{\mu}m$ among dust exist much during July~August and December~January and 76.7% of minute dust is proved to be road transportation in Gwangju.

• 환경정책연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.3-49
• /
• 2014

기업의 환경책임에 대한 이해관계자의 관심이 높아지고, 정부의 환경규제가 강화되면서 환경경영의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 그러나 아직까지 국내 기업들의 환경에 대한 인식수준은 낙후된 편이며, 환경 관련 연구들도 환경성과와 경제적 성과의 관련성에 대한 일관된 결론을 제시하지 못하고 있다. 이는 첫째, 경제적 성과는 평가범위가 상대적으로 협소하고 가격이라는 공통 단위로 측정될 수 있는 반면, 환경오염물질의 감소, 온실가스 및 탄소 배출의 감소, 에너지 효율 등과 같은 환경성과는 평가범위가 다양하고 측정단위가 상이하기 때문에 선정되는 성과지표에 따라 서로 다른 연구결과가 도출될 수 있기 때문이다. 이러한 문제점을 해결하기 위해서는 일반화되고 표준화된 성과지표의 개발이 모색되어야 하며, 특히 환경경영의 의미가 '지속성장'이란 개념으로 확장됨에 따라 이러한 정의에 부합하기 위해서는 개발된 성과지표는 환경성과와 경제적 성과의 의미를 동시에 포괄할 수 있어야 한다. 둘째, 현재 대부분의 연구는 환경경영의 실행주체인 기업의 환경투자 동기 및 환경성과에만 주목하고 있을 뿐, 환경경영의 효과적인 실천전략에 대한 명확한 기준을 제시하지 못하고 있다. 예를 들어, 경쟁업체들과의 상대적인 환경경쟁력을 비교함으로써 프로세스 개선전략 또는 시장차별화 전략을 도출하고 이를 경제적 성과와 연계하기 위한 환경전략의 선택적 대안을 제안함으로써 환경성과와 경제적 성과의 선순환적인 관계성을 확보할 수 있어야 한다. 본고에서는 첫째, 다수 투입과 다수 산출요인으로 구성된 에코효율성을 자료포획분석(Data Envelopment Analysis: DEA) 모형을 통하여 산출하고자 한다. 에코효율성을 기초로 국내 기업들의 환경경쟁력을 비교분석하고 에코효율성을 개선하기 위한 환경전략의 선택적 대안을 제시하고자 한다. 둘째, 패널분석을 이용하여 에코효율성과 경제적 성과의 인과관계를 분석하고, 합동 회귀모형을 이용하여 에코효율성과 경제적 성과의 관계성을 분석하고자 한다. 국내 23개 기업의 4개년 자료를 대상으로 DEA에서 산출된 에코효율성을 이용하여 표본기업들의 기간별 에코 효율성을 산출하였다. 산출된 에코효율성을 기초로 23개 기업의 연도별 기술효율성, 순수기술효율성 및 규모효율성을 비교하였으며 비효율적인 기업들의 에코효율성 개선 대안을 제시하였다. 또한, 에코효율성과 경제적 성과로의 인과성이 존재하고 있으며, 수익성(ROA 및 ROS) 및 기업가치(토빈 Q, 주가 및 주가수익률)와 같은 경제적 성과와 에코효율성의 관련성을 분석한 결과 에코효율성이 기업의 수익성 및 기업가치와 매우 유의적인 양(+)의 관련성을 가지고 있음을 확인하였다. 본고의 결과는 다양한 환경변수와 경제적 성과변수를 통합한 에코효율성을 이용함으로써 환경 관련 연구들의 일반성이나 보편성을 제고할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 환경관리의 지속가능성에 대해 보다 깊은 통찰력을 제공해 줄 것으로 기대한다. 또한, DEA 모형에서 제공하는 연도별 기술효율성, 순수기술효율성 및 규모효율성의 분석결과를 이용하여 에코효율성에 대한 변화의 원인을 탐색하고 환경경영에 대한 선택적 전략을 제시함으로써 환경경영의 실행방향과 구체화된 실천목표를 지원할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다. 마지막으로 본고에서 분석된 일관된 연구 결과는 기업의 환경투자가 경제적 성과로 연계될 수 있다는 점에서 선순환적인 환경경영의 동기부여 요인으로 작용할 것으로 기대한다.