• 한국관개배수회지
• /
• no.45
• /
• pp.55-56
• /
• 2010

이 책은 엘리너 오스트롬(Elinor Ostrom)이 출간한 Governing The Commons(1990)의 국문 번역서로서 관개배수와 관련된 전공서적은 아니지만, 관개배수 정책에 관심 있는 전문가 및 실무자들이 읽어볼만한 책이다.

• The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction (JLCCI)
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.47-73
• /
• 2018

Interest in communities continues to grow. Policies to support the community are also being strengthened. However, the problem of developmentalism that destroys the community is still present. Although it has been revealed clearly in the Four Major Rivers project, developmentalism still dominates the community. Reform of developmentalism is very important for the protection and upbringing of the community. It can be done through reforms of institutions that make developmentalism work. It can also be a result of reforms in development laws and development agencies. The reform of laws related to the land compulsory acceptance system and the reform of the development corporations including the Water Resources Corporation(the K-Waters). Here, it is necessary to transform the composition of 'community versus state' into a composition of 'community and state'. Communities and states should have complementary relationships for good societies. The reform of developmentalism is a core task.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.49-63
• /
• 2016

Environmental degradation and economic bipolarization have become major issues as the aftermath of the globalizing capitalism. Commons have received attention as an alternative to capitalistic use of resources. The most representative is the neo-institutionalist approach where Elinor Ostrom's study summarizes fundamental principles of common resource management. Maria Mies also insists that co-relationship in a community is the most essential to manage common resource successful. In a similar vein, this study attempts to prove that common resource management can create solutions to socioeconomic problems and ways to prevent resource scarcities in the future. Jeju-Haenyeo community is chosen as a successful case to be examined based on the fundamental principles of commons and community. Qualitative surveys have preceded for Jeju-Haenyeo to elaborate and extend the aspects of common resource use and management. This study can bring a positive influence on understanding the Jeju-Haenyeo community and other common resources management institutions.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.427-449
• /
• 2015

Network governance can be defined as collaborative process to develop a new socio-political order through civil society centered networking with government and market, and the term 'collaborative governance' can be used in a sense that the basis of governance is collaborative process. In particular, it can be stressed that collaborative governance between regions need double collaborative processes, that is, collaboration between local governments and collaboration between local government and local civil society within a region. Yet, the collaboration as a core element of collaborative governance should not be seen as a pure normativity presupposing confidence and reciprocity, but as a strategy based on competition and antagonism. The normativity implied in the concept of collaborative governance may not realized in actual process, and tends to be mobilized as a rationale for justifying neoliberal strategies. In order to overcome such limits of collaborative governance, the concept of collaborative governance should be reconstructed. This paper suggests that collaborative governance can be seen as hegemonic governing process in a Gramcian sense operating in the government plus civil society, and that, radicalizing Ostrom's concept, it also can be seen as a governing process producing polycentricity by self-regulating subjects. Finally, collaborative governance between regions needs expansion of material basis for economic complementarity and construction of infrastructure as well as a discursive process in order to enhance connectivity between them.

• The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction (JLCCI)
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.7-33
• /
• 2019

Ostrom's commons theory is based on the erroneous premise that differences in the resource management method originate from the physical attributes of resources such as subtractability and non-excludability. Thus, the theory fails to explain that the same resource may become private goods and toll goods, or common pool resources and public goods depending on the social conditions. Commons must be defined not by physical attributes but by social ones. In this study, rivalry and legitimacy of monopoly are presented as the criteria for resource classification instead of subtractability and non-excludability. Moreover, it was found through sea fields management in Jeju that legitimacy of monopoly is evaluated by the golden rule, more specifically the principle of fairness and respect for human life.