• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.11 no.12
• /
• pp.27-35
• /
• 2010

The structures built under the groundwater level are affected by the buoyancy force, which is hydrostatic pressure in the up direction. Recently, buoyancy-resistant anchor method has been applied in many cases of the construction of the important structure of large size, which is built under the groundwater level so that it takes high uplift pressure. Even if the construction cost of the method is very high, it surely increases the safety rate. However, the diagnosis of the performance of the buoyancy-resistant permanent anchor and the investigation of resistance mechanism are still insufficient. Especially, the long-term behavior of the anchor has not been studied well due to the difficulty in observation procedure. The contribution of this paper is the establishment of reasonable design methodology. We have measured anchor axial forces for 10 years after the construction, by using an automated measurement and a manual measurement by establishing a load cell in anchor head. Through the data collected from the measurements, we analyze the construction-step behavior of the anchor according to the self-weight variation of the building and the long-term behavior (i.e. movement within 10 years after the construction) of the anchor according to the passage of time.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.02a
• /
• pp.538-541
• /
• 2007

In this study, the complex AAM permanent anchor was introduced and the design method for the complex AAM permanent anchor was showed by examining the relationship of the forces applied to the anchor, the ground failure, the loads inducing the tensile failure between the anchors, etc. In order to understand the behavioral characteristics of the complex AAM permanent anchor, the field pullout test was carried out, and the results obtained with the design method were compared with those of the field pullout test.

• 지반과기술
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.25-29
• /
• 2015

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.38 no.8
• /
• pp.75-84
• /
• 2022

Currently, tension ground anchors are divided into temporary and permanent based on their purpose and period of use, and their performance evaluations are presented separately. Therefore, applying the current performance evaluation's upper and lower limits to practice seems reasonable. However, because compression ground anchors have been mainly used as permanent, performance evaluation corresponding to permanent is conducted without distinction between temporary and permanent. This evaluation is a strict standard for ground anchors used as temporary, including the removal type. Because of examining the existing performance evaluation for the compression ground anchor, the lower limit can be applied without distinguishing between the temporary and permanent. However, the upper limit should be presented separately for the temporary and permanent. In applying the upper limit, it is necessary to adjust the upper limit of the anchor considering the anchored ground condition (rock or soil), the period of use, and particularly whether the load-displacement curve maintains the elastic state.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2009.03a
• /
• pp.1032-1041
• /
• 2009

그라운드 앵커의 유지관리 점검 목적은 크게 두 가지로 구분된다. 첫째는 기 시공된 앵커 및 앵커 구조물이 설계 의도에 맞게 적절히 작용(기능)하고 있는지를 점검하고 원래 목적한 기능을 수행하도록 보수 보강하기 위함이며, 둘째는 점검결과를 바탕으로 장기적인 운용에 따라 앵커에 발생하는 결함을 보완하도록 유지관리를 고려한 설계에 활용하기 위함이다. 그러나 그라운드 앵커가 도입된 이후 40여년이 지났지만 아직 국내의 실정에 맞는 유지관리의 방안이 마련되어 있지 않은 것이 현실이며, 특히, 장기간 그 기능을 유지해야 하는 영구앵커의 경우는 유지관리가 더욱더 중요한 과제이다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 그라운드 앵커의 유지관리 점검에 대한 방안을 제안하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2006

This paper is an experimental result of performing the prototype of anchor tests in field to investigate the ultimate uplifting capacity of permanent anchor embedded in weathered rock. For prototype of actual anchor test in situ, four grouted anchors having various anchor lengths were installed in field and their ultimate uplift capacities were obtained by analyzing test results of load-displacement curves obtained from field uplift tests. On the other hand, creep tests, applying pull-out loading at the stage of the maximum loading during 15 minutes, were performed to investigate ultimate resisting capacity of anchor so that the values of creep rate at the ultimate loading conditions were evaluated. Dial gauges were installed on the surface of ground to measure the vertical displacement distribution from the anchor so that the failure mechanism of permanent anchor embedded in weathered rock and failure boundary of ground during application of loading were evaluated.

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.21 no.9
• /
• pp.6-14
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.16 no.10
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2015

In this study, to evaluate the long-term behavior characteristics and the loss of prestress force, the long-term measurement of the tensile anchors in the actual construction was performed and the results were analyzed comparing with the existing estimation. As the reinforcement member used for the purpose of slope stability or uplift-resisting of the permanent structure, etc, the permanent anchor should maintain the functions during the performance period of the structure differently from the temporary anchor. However, as the time passes by, since the relaxation and the creep of the anchor occur constantly, the management for the loss of tensile force is essential to perform the functions stably. So far, the loss of the tensile force has been estimated according to the reduction of the prestress using elasticity theory and using the relaxation value according to the type of tension member and the test using the long-term measurement is limited. Therefore, in this study, the site condition and the ground were investigated for the tensile anchor in the actual construction and the long-term measurement results more than 500 days was analyzed by installing the loadcell, inclinometer and the groundwater level gauge. In addition, the long-term behavior characteristics were evaluated by comparing the disposition of the measured earth retaining wall and the tension force loss of the anchor with the existing interpretation results. In the evaluation results, the most of the tension force loss occurs within 90 days and the loss was measured less than the estimated values.

• The Journal of Engineering Geology
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.261-271
• /
• 2014

An almost permanent anchor (friction type) is resistant to ground deformation due to the friction between the soil and grout at a fixed length from the anchor body. The purpose of this study is to calculate the force of bearing resistance for a bearing anchor in enlarged boreholes. We conducted analytical and numerical analyses, along with laboratory testing, to find the quantities of bearing resistance prior to grouting in EBA (Enlarged Bearing Anchor) construction. The force of bearing resistance from the analytical method was defined as a function of general borehole diameter, expanded borehole diameter, and soil unconfined compressive strength. We also employed the Flac 3D finite difference numerical modeling code to analyze the bearing resistance of the soil conditions. We then created a laboratory experimental model to measure bearing resistance and carried out a pull-out test. The results of these three analyses are presented here, and a regression analysis was performed between bearing resistance and uniaxial compression strength. The laboratory results yield the strongest bearing resistance, with reinforcement 28.5 times greater than the uniaxial compression strength; the analytical and numerical analyses yielded values of 13.3 and 9.9, respectively. This results means that bearing resistance of laboratory test appears to be affected by skin friction resistance. To improve the reliability of these results, a comparison field study is needed to verify which results (analytical, numerical, or laboratory) best represent field observations.

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.37 no.5
• /
• pp.37-41
• /
• 2021