• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.46
• /
• pp.287-323
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is the design of the archival appraisal criteria to judge important research records and set the appraisal direction in the public research institution. The scope of research was limited to design the applicable appraisal criteria at the research institutions rather than in national level and the appraisal criteria examples in three public research institutions were analyzed. Based on the results of this analysis, I suggested the appraisal and selection criteria for long term preservation of research records including 10 appraisal areas. This study has a little limit because the suggested appraisal criteria was not verified by researchers(key appraiser) and enough examples were not analyzed. However, this study can support research institutions to set the scope and type of research records to be preserved. In addition, I hope that this study can give a little help institutions to judge and select key research records.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.49-70
• /
• 2017

This study, as the basic research for making research records management policies, aims to define research records and analyze the value and characteristics of research records from an archives and records management perspective. For these purposes, this study defines research records and their types by reviewing related studies. In addition, this study analyzed the following research records values: (1) evidence of research integrity and accountability with regard to research misconduct; (2) information for a succeeding study and an honorable failure; and (3) an asset for intellectual property rights and technology transfer. Finally, this study extracted the following characteristics of the research records: (1) each type of documents, data, and materials; (2) the archival bond between program and records; and (3) the continuity of production and use of the records. The findings from this analysis could be considered in revising related laws and policies.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.41
• /
• pp.75-111
• /
• 2014

With the quantitative growth of research data, the issue of enormous preservation cost and sharing expansion, the organizations should prioritize the collections then select the data that are worthy of save. Therefore, today, it is important for the organizations to appraise the continuing value of produced records. Considering the universities and the public institutions such as governmentfunded research institutes as the heavy producer of the data, it becomes a rising problem for the records management that it does not go beyond the framework of "administrative records" and "public records". In this study, I looked into the background of the contention that the research records must be managed in a different perspective and checked the characteristics of research records in therms of the producers, research activities and records. Based on this analysis, I suggested the main issues and considerations about the subjects, criterias and methods in research records appraisal.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.9
• /
• pp.193-209
• /
• 2004

• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.38 no.1
• /
• pp.76.1-76.1
• /
• 2013

고대 천문기록을 연구하는 과정에서 기록의 사실 여부와 함께 천문기록에 영향을 미치는 요소를 확인하는 것은 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 고대의 천문기록 중에서 관측 빈도수가 높은 유성과 유성우 기록을 통해 이들의 분포와 역사적 환경 요소와의 관련성을 알아보았다. 유성과 유성우 기록을 분석한 선행연구에 의하면 한국과 중국 일본의 고대 유성과 유성우 기록은 잘 알려진 주기 유성우의 특성을 잘 보여준다. 그러나 인접한 세 나라의 관측 기록은 시대별로 일부 다른 분포를 보이는데 이러한 이유를 알아보기 위해 세 나라의 역사적 환경과 천문기록 분포와의 상관관계를 조사하였다. 본 연구에서는 1200년부터 1700년까지 500년 동안의 왕조-왕위교체, 외부침략, 내란과 같은 역사 사건을 조사하여 중요도에 따라 세 등급으로 나누고 이들을 유성과 유성우 기록 분포와 비교하였다. 연구 결과, 한국과 중국 일본의 고대 유성과 유성우의 기록 분포와 역사적 사건과는 서로 관련성이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 세 나라의 고대 천문관측 기록이 정치적 사건의 영향을 받지 않았음을 의미한다. 고대 천문기록을 분석할 경우 역사적 사건이나 왕위교체 등의 사회적 영향보다는 시대별 천문기록의 분포개수를 고려한 가중치가 중요하게 고려되어야 할 것이다.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.66
• /
• pp.105-155
• /
• 2020

Research records are a type of record with a range of controversies over the core elements of management, such as the definition and scope of research records, and who manages research records, despite the critical need for their management. Research records have been neglected in blind spots because it is difficult to manage them, but if well managed, they are evaluated as records with a highly potential value that can be used infinitely later. In particular, government-funded research institutes, as both research institutes and public institutions, take responsibility for systematic management of these research records. Therefore, as this study noted the necessity of research records appraisal for the systematic management of research records in government-funded research institutes, and conducted interviews with 11 records managers working at government-funded research institutes in Korea, the current status of research records management and appraisal of government-funded research institutes was identified. As a result, improvement measures for research records appraisal was suggested as follows. First of all, in the light of the current public records appraisal system, there is a problem of effectiveness in applying it to the research record appraisal system as it is. Therefore, this study suggested that an appraisal system appropriate for research records was needed, and proposed plans for improving the research records appraisal system in terms of purposes, authority, methods, time point, tools and criteria for appraisal.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.57-85
• /
• 2013

This study was aimed at investigating the job characteristics and job environment of records managers who are in archives of autonomous districts, find out the problems with the management of duties for local records managers, and deduce the improvement methods that could help records managers more efficiently perform their duties. Through literature review, the study investigated the concept of basic autonomous districts, the allocated summary and duties of records managers through with basic autonomous districts, and the present conditions and duties of the archives through autonomous Gu offices that were in study. Based on the theories of job characteristics and job environment factors, the study drew up a survey that encompasses the present demographic summary, job characteristics, job environment, and working conditions.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2019

Research records are essential records to explain the accountability of research throughout the life cycle of a research project. Thus, they need to be properly managed, preserved, and shared. This study analyzed the effectiveness and ability of applying DMP to research records management. This study also suggested the RRMP (Research Records Management Plan) for the research records management and preservation in scientific research institutes. RRMP is considered as up-front planning for the research records management and preservation before any records are created.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.9
• /
• pp.210-233
• /
• 2004

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.155-175
• /
• 2017

This study explores the present state of the National Archives of Korea (NAK) and the branch archives and proposes development programs to reestablish their roles. With regard to the NAK, I discussed five issues, and for the branch archives, I discussed three. The issues on NAK are as follows: 1) Is NAK the nation's record keeper?; 2) Does NAK promote the establishment of local archives?; 3) Does NAK supervise and oversee the records management of all public institutions?; 4) What is the raison $d^{\prime}{\hat{e}}tre$ and the vision of NAK?; and 5) Does NAK perform a simple administrative service? Meanwhile, the issues on the branch archives are as follows: 1) Is the branch archives a permanent records management institution?; 2) Are the names of the branch archives appropriate?; and 3) Are the branch archives simple document warehouses?