• 제목/요약/키워드: 에어로빅복

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.016초

면/스판덱스 편성물의 황변발생 원인에 관한 연구

  • 박흥수;이명학;김영호
    • 한국섬유공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국섬유공학회 1998년도 가을 학술발표회논문집
    • /
    • pp.122-125
    • /
    • 1998
  • 스판덱스사는 탄성, 내약품성 및 염색성 등이 우수하여 주로 여성용 파운데이션, 수영복, 스타킹, 에어로빅복 및 체조복 등의 신축성이 요구되는 소재에 활용되고 있다[1-4]. 스판덱스사가 의류에 사용되는 경우에는 제직상의 어려움 등으로 인하여 직물보다는 편성물에 주로 사용되며, 그 자체만으로는 잘 사용되지 않고 다른 섬유와 혼용하여 사용한다. (중략)

  • PDF

에어로빅복의 소재 차이에 따른 착용감에 관한 연구 (A Study on Wearing Sensation in Accordance with difference in Materials of Aerobic Wear)

  • 이미경;류숙희
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.116-126
    • /
    • 1998
  • This study was conducted to examine the effect of difference in materials of aerobic wear on both human body's physiological reactions and subjective wearing sensation by comparing and analysing not only cotton sparidex A, B and C but nylon spandex D, E and F used as actually wearing materials. The rectal temperature of type A and I remained at high degree, the type C was higher from after high-speed running but dropped sharply when taking a break finally. Both skin temperature and mean skin temperature dropped sharply due to sweat occurred during physical exercise, and then rose slowly when taking a break. Type A -D and B-I showed that the mean skin temperature remained at high degree when wearing a cotton spandex. Type C's temperature within its aerobic wear was lower than type F while its relative humidity was higher than type F. Wearing sensation showed a change similar to wearing, particularly, which was remarkable in type B-E. Also, it was shown that humidity sensation, tactile sensation and comfort sensation were good when wearing the cotton spandex.

  • PDF

에어로빅복의 유니버설 디자인을 위한 동작 적합성 평가 (An Evaluation of Aerobic Exercise Wear Mobility as a Basic Criterion for Universal Design)

  • 손주희;최정화;강태진
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제31권3호
    • /
    • pp.343-350
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study compared and studied the clothing mobility of two types of aerobic clothes - those made of currently popular stretch materials and those made of new stretch materials that were specially developed for this study. The focus of the comparison was on the range of joint movement during activity, and the physiological burden imposed on the body by the clothes. In total, 18 experiments were carried out under controlled conditions in an artificial climatic chamber with a temperature of $25{\pm}1^{\circ}C$, air humidity of $60{\pm}5^{\circ}C$ and negligible air movement. Each exercise program consisted of a 30-minute of aerobic workout and a 20-minute rest following the exercise. Measurements were taken to determine the following: physiological reactions (whole-body and local sweat rates), subjective sensations(of temperature, humidity, comfort, tightness, and clothing wetness), joint angle(measured with a goniometer), and so on. The results of the study us as follows: Material B excels in clothing mobility. Material C excels in sweat absorbency and drying speed. Material A was found to be the hottest material, while material C was found to be slightly hot through the analysis of the change in pre- and post-exercise bodyweight(= amount of sweat). Regarding the amount of evaporated sweat, material A>material C>material B. Material B produced the smallest amount of evaporated sweat. The wider the range of joint movement, the smaller the amount of sweat and the lower the average skin temperature.

시판 에어로빅복의 재료 특성에 따른 쾌적성능에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Comfort Properties of Aerobic Wear with Different Materials)

  • 류숙회;이순원
    • 한국의류학회지
    • /
    • 제15권1호
    • /
    • pp.61-69
    • /
    • 1991
  • In order to investigate the comfort properties of aerobic wear with different materials, the physiological responses, subjective wear sensation and microclimate were measured. The experimental garment were all-in·one type with half·length sleeves made of cotton/ polyurethane and nylon/ polyhrethane fabrics. The conditions of the experimental room were controlled to maintain two type of environ- ments, i.e. $25{\pm}1^{\circ}C$, $60{\pm}5\%$ R. H. and $30{\pm}1^{\circ}C$, $70{\pm}5\%$ R.H., Air velocity was maintained at 0.25 misec all the time. The results are as follows; 1) At $25^{\circ}C$, mean skin temperature and comfort sensation were not significantly different among 2 types of materials. 2) At $30^{\circ}C$, aerobic wear made of cotton/polyurethane fibers showed better pleasant tactile sensation than that of nylon/polyurethane fibers. 3) Under both environmental conditions, microclimate of two types of aerobic wear was not significantly different. 4) Among several aspects of wear sensations, tactile sensation was the most powerful factor to differenciate material differences of aerobic wear.

  • PDF