• Title/Summary/Keyword: 앞전 모서리 홈

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Controlling Horseshoe Vortex by the Leading-Edge Chamfer Groove in a Generic Wing-Body Junction (일반적인 블레이드 형상에서의 앞전 모서리 홈에 의한 말굽와류 제어)

  • Cho, Jong-Jae;Choe, Byeong-Ik;Kim, Jae-Min;Kim, Kui-Soon
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Conference
    • /
    • 2008.11a
    • /
    • pp.185-191
    • /
    • 2008
  • The aerodynamic losses so attributed to the endwall - usually termed secondary flow losses or secondary losses - can be as high as 30$\sim$50% of the total aerodynamic losses in a blade or stator row. Inlet guide vanes, with lower total turning and higher convergence ratios, will have smaller secondary losses, amounting to as much as 20% of total loss for an inlet stator row. These are important part for improving a turbine efficiency. The present study deals with a leading edge chamfer groove on a wing-body to investigate the vortex generation and characteristics of a horseshoe vortex with the installed height, and depth of the groove. The current study is investigated with $FLUENT^{TM}$.

  • PDF

Controlling the Horseshoe Vortex by Leading-Edge Chamfer at a Generic Wing-Body Junction (단순 날개-몸체 접합부에서의 앞전 모서리 홈에 의한 말굽와류 제어)

  • Cho, Jong-Jae;Kim, Kui-Soon
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.26-34
    • /
    • 2009
  • Secondary flow losses can be as high as 30~50% of the total aerodynamic losses for a turbo-machinery blade or stator row. These are important part for improving a turbine efficiency. Therefore, many studies have been performed to decrease the secondary flow losses. The present study deals with the chamfered leading-edge at a generic wing-body junction to decrease the horseshoe vortex, one of factors to generate the secondary flow losses, and investigates the vortex generation and the characteristics of the horseshoe vortex with the chamfered height, and depth of the chamfer by using $FLUENT^{TM}$. It was found that the total pressure loss for the best case can be decreased about 1.55% compare to the baseline case.