• Title/Summary/Keyword: 알 권리

Search Result 160, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Right to delete and Right to be forgotten -Discuss on the condition of the right to delete (기사삭제 요구권과 잊혀질 권리 - 기사삭제의 인정기준에 관한 논의)

  • Hong, Sook-Yeong
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.12 no.12
    • /
    • pp.13-22
    • /
    • 2014

  • The right to be forgotten is a world-wide issue after the decision of the European Court of Justice which accepted that right. This essay discusses about the guide lines for protecting the right to delete, a category of the right to be forgotten. I classified those guide lines as follows : (1) sensitiveness of the personal information, (2) offensiveness to reasonable and ordinary people, (3) intention of writing the article, (4) value of historical record, (5) importance of privacy comparing with right to know with time flow, (6) public figure, (7) article based on fact or opinion. To effectively protect right to be forgotten and delete, we have to consider Privacy Impact Assessment, using blind system, unification of multiple institutions, and reforming press arbitration system.

  • https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.12.13 인용 PDF KSCI

Legalization of Right to be Forgotten and Freedom of Press in the Digital Media Environment (디지털 미디어 환경에서 잊혀질 권리의 법제화와 언론의 자유)

  • Kim, Hyung-Il
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.11 no.9
    • /
    • pp.21-27
    • /
    • 2013

  • With the advent of digital media environment, distribution way of information changes, legalization of the right to be forgotten is becoming increasingly necessary. However, too much emphasis on protection of personal information to hinder the development of the Internet industry and constitutional rights, including freedom of speech and right to know might be infringed. Thus, the scope of the right to be forgotten there is a need to clarify the rules. First, the rights of personal information can be divided into two. Right to be forgotten can be applied to the right to self-determination of personal information, but the right to self-determination information about social personality cannot be applied to. Second, in the digital media environment, old news article over the internet repeatedly distribution as the new damage is generating. Because old news article is a historical record, the right to be forgotten can not be applied. Thus, appropriate for digital media environment must find new ways.

  • https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.9.021 인용 PDF

The Promotion State and Measures to Improve the Record Information Disclosure System (기록정보공개 제도 개선 추진 현황과 방안)

  • Zoh, Young-Sam
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.22
    • /
    • pp.77-114
    • /
    • 2009

  • The right to know is not satisfied merely by making or improving laws or systems. The right to know is a matter of culture rather than system. Nevertheless, consistent system improvement measures are required. There are many laws relating to the right to know. In particular, at the core are the Official Information Disclosure Act, the Record and Archives Management Act, and the Presidential Record Management Act. The fact that systems relating to official record management and presidential record management are related to the right to know is understood by the promotion of records and archives management reform after the year 2004, as a result of which the national archives management innovation road map was established. Reflecting the many opinions of the "Information Disclosure System Improvement Task Force" composed with participation of the government and the press after the participatory government's announcement of "Measures to Advance the Support System for News Coverage," amendments to the Information Disclosure Act have come forward with system improvement measures in connection with issues that had arisen until then. Such improvement measures have not resulted in actual improvements. This thesis proposes several system improvement measures, focusing on those that have arisen until now but have not been reflected in discussion, such as converting the concept of information non-disclosure into disclosure postponement, preparing and disclosing particular information disclosure standards, specifying personal information for non-disclosure, specifying and strictly applying any information that has not been disclosed for purposes of internal review, deleting non-disclosure items in stenographic records that do not have a reason to exist, and establishing limits and terms of non-disclosure. Of the most remarkable system improvement measures that have been made until now is our recognition that the right to know is not limited to the information disclosure system but that the "cause" of archive management should be systematic and scientific. In other words, the right to know is understood to establish not just accidential factors, such as with a whistle-blower, but the inevitable factors of systemization of production, distribution, preservation, and use of archives. Much more study should be pursued regarding disclosure of archives information. In particular, difficult issues to be resolved regarding reading records at permanent archives management institutions, such as the National Archives of Korea, or copyrights that arise in the process, require constant study from academia and relevant institutions.

  • https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2009.22.077 인용 PDF