• Title/Summary/Keyword: 알루미늄 복합 판넬

Search Result 9, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

Evaluation on Adiabatic Property for Vehicular Sandwich Composite Structure (차체 구조용 샌드위치 복합소재 단열 특성 평가)

  • Lee Sang Jin;Oh Kyung Won;Jeong Jong Cheol;Kong Chang duk;Kim Jeong Seok;Cho Se Hyun
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.9-14
    • /
    • 2006
  • Experimental investigation on heat transfer ratio was firstly performed with three types of sandwich panels such as the Carbon/Epoxy Skin-Aluminum Honeycomb and Balsa Core Sandwich Panel of 37mm thickness, the Carbon/Epoxy Aluminum Skin-Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panel of 57mm thickness (including insulator) and the Carbon/Epoxy Skin-Aluminum Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panel of 37mm thickness based on the KS F 2278:2003(Insulation test method of windows). In additional to this investigation, experimental tests were also done for evaluation of heat transportation ratio with the Aluminum Skin- Aluminium Honeycomb Sandwich Panels of 27mm and 35mm thickness, and Aluminum Skin-Foaming Aluminum Sandwich Panel of 27mm thickness by the KS F2277:2002 (Insulation measuring method of construction component-Calibration heat box method or protective heat box method). In this study, it was found that the larger net heat transfer cross sectional area between the skin and the sandwich core is given, the higher heat transportation ratio occurs. It was also found that the hybrid type insulation had better insulation characteristics compared to the non-hybrid type insulation.

Low Velocity Impact Behavior of Aluminium and Glass-Fiber Honeycomb Structure (알루미늄과 유리섬유 하니컴 구조의 저속 충격 거동)

  • Kim, Jin Woo;Won, Cheon;Lee, Dong Woo;Kim, Byung Sun;Bae, Sung In;Song, Jung Il
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.26 no.2
    • /
    • pp.116-122
    • /
    • 2013
  • In this study, impact behavior of aluminium and glass-fiber structure is studied under low impact velocity. Compression test is carried out to investigate the compressive strength of the specimens. The degree of damage is observed using microscopy and compared with the experimental analysis data. The maximum load capacity, impact strength and elastic energy of glass-fiber honeycomb sandwich panel are more than the aluminium honeycomb sandwich panel.

특허기술평가결과 활용사례-(주)송원

  • Korea Invention Promotion Association
    • 발명특허
    • /
    • v.31 no.7 s.361
    • /
    • pp.66-68
    • /
    • 2006
  • 건축을 하는데 있어 무엇보다 중요한 것은 정확한 설계, 시공 및 뛰어난 기술력이며, 각 부분 부분마다의 정확성과 뛰어난 기술이 어우러져 튼튼하고 아름다운 집이 탕생하게 되는 것이다. 이런 조건은 충족시키는 첫 번째 요소라 할 수 있는 국내 건축용 외장재 시장은 약 1조원대의 시장을 형성하고 있으며, 전체 건축비의 약 10%정도를 차지한다. 건축용 외장재 시장은 석재, 유리, 알루미늄, 아연도금철판의 기본 소재에 다양한 가공을 통하여 제품을 생산하고 있으며, 가공 및 시공의 편의성으로 인해 금속계 패널이 점진적으로 시장을 주도하고 있다. 금속계 패널은 크게 복합판넬과 sheet 패널시장으로 양분되며, sheet패널시장이 약 20%정도의 시장을 차지하고 있다. 해외의 경우, 유럽과 일본은 알루미늄계열의 패널과 미국은 철판계열의 패널이 시장을 주도하고 있다.

  • PDF

Design and Verification of a Novel Composite Sandwich Joint Structure (새로운 개념의 복합재 샌드위치 체결부 구조의 설계와 검증)

  • Kwak, Byeong-Su;Ju, Hyun-woo;Kim, Hong-Il;Dong, Seung-Jin;Kweon, Jin-Hwe
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.30 no.6
    • /
    • pp.384-392
    • /
    • 2017
  • Sandwich panels with three different joint configurations were tested to design a novel sandwich joint structure that can effectively support both the tensile and compressive loads. The sandwich core was mainly aluminum flex honeycomb but the PMI foam core was limitedly applied to the ramp area which is transition part from sandwich to solid laminate. The face of sandwich panel was made of carbon fiber composite. For configuration 1, the composite flange and the sandwich panel were cocured. For configurations 2 and 3, an aluminum flange was fastened to the solid laminate by HI-LOK pins and adhesive. The average compressive failure loads of configurations 1, 2, and 3 were 295, 226, and 291 kN, respectively, and the average tensile failure loads were 47.3 (delamination), 83.7 (bolt failure), and 291 (fixture damage) kN, respectively. Considering the compressive failure loads only, both the configurations 1 and 3 showed good performance. However, the configuration 1 showed delamination in the corner of the composite flange under tension at early stage of loading. Therefore, it was confirmed that the structure that can effectively support tension and compressive loads at the same time is the configuration 3 which used a mechanically fastened aluminum flange so that there is no risk of delamination at the corner.

Low-velocity Impact Behavior of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Panel (알루미늄 하니컴 샌드위치 판넬의 저속충격거동)

  • 이현석;배성인;함경춘;한경섭;송정일
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society For Composite Materials Conference
    • /
    • 2001.05a
    • /
    • pp.78-82
    • /
    • 2001
  • Impact behaviors of Aluminum Honeycombs Sandwich Panel(AHSP) by drop weight test were investigated. Two types of specimens with 1/2" and 1/4" cell size were tested by two impactors which are weight of $5.25\textrm{kg}_{\textrm{f}}$ and $11.9\textrm{kg}_{\textrm{f}}$. Parametric studies were achieved including the impactor weight and impact sites which consist face, long-edge, short-edge, and point of the specimen. Face one of impact sites was the strongest and short-edge one of impact sites was the weakest. The damaged area of AHSP was enlarged with the increase of impactor weight that is equal to impact energy. After 3 point bending test, fracture modes of AHSP were analyzed with AE counts. Lower facesheet was fractured in the long-edge direction and then separated between facesheet and core. In the short-edge direction after core wrinkled, lower facesheet tear occurred. Impact behavior by FE analysis were increased localized damage in fast velocity because the faster velocity of the impact was, the smaller the stress of core was. Consequently, impactor weight had an effect on widely damaged area, while the impact velocity was caused on the localized damaged area.aged area.

  • PDF

Design and Fabrication of Composite Sandwich Payload Platform and Strut Tubes for Satellite Main Body Structures (인공위성 본체 복합재료 샌드위치 플랫폼 및 튜브 스트럿 구조물의 설계 및 제작)

  • Roh, Hui-Seok;Choi, Heung-Seop;Ha, Jae-Seon;Son, Won-Gi;Kim, Cheol;Lee, Ju-Hun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society For Composite Materials Conference
    • /
    • 2002.10a
    • /
    • pp.228-232
    • /
    • 2002
  • 본 연구에서는 다목적 실용위성 2호기에 적용된 금속 구조물 중 알루미늄 샌드위치 패널 구조인 탑재체 플랫폼과 튜브 스트럿(tube strut) 구조에 복합재료 응용기술을 적용하였다. 복합재료 구조로의 대체 설계에서도 관성하중 및 음향진동등과 같은 극심한 발사환경과 더불어 운용하게 될 우주 열환경을 고려하였다. 연구의 목적은 금속소재보다 비강도, 비강성이 우수한 복합재료를 위성 구조물에 사용함으로써 무게를 경량화함에 있다.

  • PDF

NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL AIR VELOCITY AND DIRECTION ON FLAME SPREAD IN HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH THE ALUMINUM COMPOSITE EXTERNAL MATERIALS (알루미늄 복합 외장재를 사용한 고층 건축물의 외기 풍속, 풍향 변화가 화염전파에 미치는 영향에 대한 수치해석 연구)

  • Kim, H.J;Bae, S.Y.;Choi, Y.K.;Ryou, H.S.
    • 한국전산유체공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2011.05a
    • /
    • pp.225-229
    • /
    • 2011
  • The aluminum composite panel are widely used for the external materials of high rise building because of well insulation of heat and sound and improved Constructability. However, the polyethylene in main material of the aluminum composite panel shows weakness in thermal and fire resistances. For this reason, flame is spread more quickly when the fire break out. Therefore, the potentiality of fire spread to the exterior wall is high due to difficulty of early extinguishment and effect of external air. In this study, numerical investigation was performed by using FDS program for flame spread characteristics with various external air velocity and direction in ten-story building with the aluminum composite external materials. As a result, the flame spread velocity is 0.134m/s and it takes 224 seconds for flames to spread to the 10th floor without external air velocity. however, the flame spread velocity decreases 40% and it takes 348 seconds for flames to spread to the 10th floor when external air velocity is 2.5 m/s. and air direction is little effect compared to air velocity.

  • PDF

An Experimental Study for Vertical Flame Spread Analysis of Aluminum Composite Panel (알루미늄 복합 패널의 수직 화염전파속도 분석을 위한 실험적 연구)

  • Kim, Il-Kwon;Kim, Bong-Chan;Ku, In-hyuck;Seo, Dong-Gu;Lim, Nam Gi;Kwun, Young-Jin
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2013.05a
    • /
    • pp.315-317
    • /
    • 2013
  • To analyze vertical fire spreadability of aluminum composite panel, real scale test of aluminum composite panel and fire retardant aluminum composite panel was conducted as well as analysis of domestic code, test and domestic reaserch resulted in following conclusion. Fire spread risk assessment of aluminum Composite Panel is impossible with the current regulations (Cone Calorimeter Test). It need to changes of regulatory and combustion expanded risk assessment and regulatory changes in the test methods need to be judged. Also, there is quite a big different between the general aluminum Composite Panel and semi-non combustible of aluminum Composite Panel. However it is also deemed to be danger when present in the sidewall to the top consisting of fire spread. From now on, it is needed the study about interpretation of fire spread and sidewall of vertical fire spread analysis not only experiments for aluminum Composite Panel.

  • PDF

An Experimental Study on the Failure of a Novel Composite Sandwich Structure (새로운 형상의 복합재 샌드위치 체결부 구조의 파손거동 연구)

  • Kwak, Byeong-Su;Kim, Hong-Il;Dong, Seung-Jin;Choi, Jin-Ho;Kweon, Jin-Hwe
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.29 no.4
    • /
    • pp.209-215
    • /
    • 2016
  • The failure of composite sandwich structures with thickness and material variation was studied. The main body of the structure is sandwich plate made of the carbon composite face and Aluminum honeycomb core. It is connected with composite laminated flange without core through transition region of tapered sandwich panel with foam core. Tension and compression tests were conducted for the total of 6 panels, 3 for each. Test results showed that the panels under compression are vulnerable to the face failure along the material discontinuity line between two different cores. However the failure load of which panel does not show such failure can carry 16% more load and fails in honeycomb core and face debonding. For the tensile load, the extensive delamination failure was observed at the corner radius which connects the panel and the flange. The average failure load for compression is about 7 times the tensile failure load. Accordingly, these sandwich structures should be applied to the components that endure the compressive loadings.