• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.35 no.8
• /
• pp.50-53
• /
• 2015

• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.1 no.3
• /
• pp.40-44
• /
• 2008

• Safe Food
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2007

• Safe Food
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.28-32
• /
• 2007

• The Science & Technology
• /
• s.525
• /
• pp.52-57
• /
• 2013

• Nuclear industry
• /
• v.36 no.12
• /
• pp.65-70
• /
• 2016

• Magazine of korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.9-25
• /
• 2019

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.18 no.6
• /
• pp.611-619
• /
• 2018

The researches have only conducted regarding construction safety management and risk on interior construction site(workers) and is insufficient about the exterior construction site(third party). As a result, ordinary people who were near construction sites have injured and hold a negative view when they think about the construction industry because construction industry have been exposed to them having a high accidents rate through media. In addition, the importance of industrial disaster prevention is emphasized at this point in time, the overall safety management system should be constructed with considering construction site external(third human) for improving the negative image of the construction industry among ordinary people. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develop the quantification model of human accident utilizing the insurance claim payout occurred construction site exterior(third party). In the future, it can be used as a reference for developing the safety management checklist in construction site interior exterior and development for forecasting control system of human accident.

• The Journal of shipping and logistics
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.565-581
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is evaluate factor for risk management of hazardous substance at ports. The analysis was conducted by applying Fuzzy-AHP methodology, through a questionnaire for hazardous substance experts from Busan, Gwangyang, Incheon, and Ulsan, which are the major Korean ports. Three measurement areas and nine sub-factors were selected for the study. The results of this analysis showed that "human resource management" (HR) was the most important factor (0.445) in the three measurement areas. After applying the conversion weight, the sub-factors were ranked according to their priority as follows: "a secure of administrator skill" (0.158) had the first rank, "an improvement in administrator duty" (0.150) had the second, and "consolidation of safety education" (0.136) had the third rank.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Safety
• /
• v.38 no.6
• /
• pp.72-78
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this paper is to derive a quantified approach for Operator Manual Actions (OMAs) based on the existing fire Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) methodology developed by the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). The existing fire HRA method was reviewed, and supplementary considerations for OMA quantification were established through a comparative analysis with NUREG-1852 criteria and the review of the existing literature. The OMA quantification approach involves a timeline that considers the occurrence of Multiple Spurious Operations (MSOs) during a Main Control Room Abandonment (MCRA) determination and movement towards the Remote Shutdown Panel (RSP) in the event of a Main Control Room (MCR) fire. The derived failure probability of an OMA from the approach proposed in this paper is expected to enhance the understanding of its reliability. Therefore, it allows moving beyond the deterministic classification of "reliable" or "unreliable" in NUREG-1852. Also, in the event of a nuclear power plant fire where multiple OMAs are required within a critical time range, it is anticipated that the OMA failure probability could serve as a criterion for prioritizing OMAs and determining their order of importance.