• Title/Summary/Keyword: 악성 위장관 협착

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Indication and Post-Procedural Management of Upper GI Stent Implantation (상부 위장관 스텐트 삽입술의 이해 -적응증 및 추적 관리-)

  • Joo, Moon-Kyung;Park, Jong-Jae
    • Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.49-55
    • /
    • 2009
  • Self expandable metal stent (stent) implantation of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract is now widely accepted for the palliation of obstructive symptoms caused by inoperable malignant UGI obstruction. With the technical progress and accumulation of clinical experiences, it became possible to perform the procedure easily, safely and effectively. However, clinicians should pay attention to the post-procedural care, because early or late complications such as ulceration, pain, bleeding, food impaction, perforation, migration or in-stent tumor growth could occur. In this review, several topics about stent placement in the UGI tract are discussed, such as major indications for stenting, kinds of stents, and post-procedural management.

  • PDF

Pyloric Obstruction with Advanced Gastric Cancer: Stent vs. Bypass (악성 위출구 폐쇄 치료의 선택: 스텐트 삽입술 혹은 수술적 우회술?)

  • Lee, Beom-Jae;Park, Jong-Jae
    • Journal of Gastric Cancer
    • /
    • v.9 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-5
    • /
    • 2009
  • In the past, conservative bypass surgery was usually performed for palliation of malignant obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. However, endoscopic stenting was developed recently, and technical advances and clinical experience have made it possible to establish stent implantation as one of the main treatment options. There are several advantages in stent implantation over bypass surgery, such as high feasibility and technical success rate, non-invasiveness, rapid symptomatic response, short hospitalization, and cost-effect benefits. Complications, such as stent ingrowth, stent injury by bile or acid, and migration, may occur and early re-insertion is frequently needed. Recently, diverse novel stents which are powered to predict stent migration or ingrowth have been developed and are being used in the clinical setting. In general, stent implantation is known to be beneficial in patients who are expected to survive <6 months, and surgical bypass may be more effective in patients who can survive >6 months. In this review, we have compared the technical feasibility, clinical outcomes, complications, and cost-benefit between stent implantation and bypass surgery, and determined the optimal treatment strategy in malignant upper gastrointestinal obstruction.

  • PDF