• Title/Summary/Keyword: 아피찻퐁 위라세타쿤

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

A Study on Structural Aspect of Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema -Focused on the style of Structural Film and Apichatpong Weerasethakul's Film- (현대영화에 나타난 스토리텔링의 구조적 경향에 관한 연구 -구조영화와 아피찻퐁 위라세타쿤의 영화양식 비교를 중심으로-)

  • Seo, Won-Tae
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.12 no.9
    • /
    • pp.325-333
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this research is to analyse the structural aspect of storytelling in contemporary cinema which is focused on the Apichatpong Weerasethakul's film. The structural/materialist filmmakers insisted the formal experiment of film form itself and the methodology to create meaning by using it. Apichatpong Weerasethakul accepted and recreated aesthetic result of the structural/materialist film to transform his own cinematic style. As a result, he expanded his film aesthetic to post-modern film aesthetics. For this, he created the structure of film by using diegetic and non-diegetic sound and image creatively. The conventional storytelling method of contemporary cinema is based on the classic theory of 'poetica' of Aristoteles, which creates illusory diegesis of cinema. but Apichatpong Weerasethakul seeks and re-constructs storytelling methodology based on the product of structural/materialist film.

The Semiosis of the Body in Modern Asian Cinema - A Comparative Study of Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Tsai Ming Liang Film (현대 아시아 영화에 나타난 몸의 기호작용 연구 - 아피찻퐁 위라세타쿤과 차이밍량의 영화를 중심으로)

  • Kim, Ho Young
    • Cross-Cultural Studies
    • /
    • v.51
    • /
    • pp.133-160
    • /
    • 2018
  • The films of Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Tsai Ming Liang expose one of the main features of modern Asian cinema: corporality. In their films, the various emotions of characters are expressed and exchanged through the body, not the language, so their film world is a world in which language has lost its function and symbolic order has collapsed. In Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Tsai Ming Liang movies, body language plays a more important role than general language. t=The body performs semiosis, pointing to wildness, anti-civilization, rite, alienation, illusion, etc. At the root of this variety of semiosis is the common denial of Western material civilization which has been rapidly transplanted in modern Asian countries. In addition, while the body of the two directors' films are seen as a sign of wildness, or anti-civilization that contains the intention of escaping from the oppressive and inhuman modern civilization, the body as a sign of illusion, and embraces the will of resistance to civilization. The illusion of experience in their films is ultimately a manifestation of the will to resist the physical and emotional pressures of reality and to continue the irrational persistence.