• Title/Summary/Keyword: 아리피프라졸

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjunctive Aripiprazole versus Bupropion Uses to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor on the Specific Symptom of Depression : A post-hoc, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Study (세로토닌 재흡수 억제제에 대한 아리피프라졸 및 부프로피온 부가요법의 우울증 세부증상에 대한 효과 비교 : 다기관, 개방표지, 무작위 연구)

  • Lee, Ga-Won;Lee, Kwang-Hun;Park, Young-Woo;Lee, Jong-hun;Koo, Bon-Hoon;Lee, Seung-Jae;Sung, Hyung-Mo;Cheon, Eun-Jin
    • Anxiety and mood
    • /
    • v.13 no.2
    • /
    • pp.66-73
    • /
    • 2017
  • Objective : The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of adjunctive aripiprazole versus bupropion on specific symptoms of depression. Methods : Data were from 6-week, randomized, prospective, open-label multi-center study in 103 patients with major depressive disorders. Participants were randomized to receive aripiprazole (2.5-10 mg/day) or bupropion (150-300 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Change in four subscales of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) that capture core depression symptoms was determined, and change in individual HAM-D17 items was also assessed. Changes in three composite subscales-anxiety, insomnia, and drive were also examined. Results : Within-group change in the four core subscales was large [effect size (ES)=1.30-1.47] and it was similar to that in the HAM-D17 total score. Differences between aripiprazole and bupropion were significant for each of the four core subscales and the HAM-D17 total score favored aripiprazole (p<0.001). On three composite scales, both treatments caused substantial changes in anxiety (within-group ES=1.10 (aripiprazole) vs. 1.00 (bupropion)], insomnia (ES=0.75 vs 0.50), and drive (ES=1.17 vs 1.15). Conclusion : This results suggested that both aripiprazole and bupropion adjunctive therapies with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors resulted in significant and clinically meaningful changes in core symptom subscales for depression.

Screening of Potential Anticancer Compounds from Marketed Drugs: Aripiprazole, Haloperidol, Miconazole, and Terfenadine Inhibit Cytochrome P450 2J2 (시판 약물의 시토크롬 2J2 약물대사효소 저해능 탐색)

  • Liu, Kwang-Hyeon
    • Journal of Life Science
    • /
    • v.21 no.11
    • /
    • pp.1558-1564
    • /
    • 2011
  • Cytochrome P450 2J2 (CYP2J2) plays important roles in the metabolism of endogenous metabolites such as arachidonic acid as well as therapeutic drugs. CYP2J2 is overexpressed in human cancer tissues and cancer cell lines, as well as in epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) and CYP2J2-mediated metabolites, and prevent apoptosis of cancer cells. This study aimed to screen marketed drugs for inhibitory potential on CYP2J2 isoforms using human liver microsomes. The initial screen isolated 4 compounds, from 120 marketed drugs, that inhibited the CYP2J2-mediated astemizole O-demethylation more than 50% in the following the order: haloperidol (75%) > terfenadine (56%) > aripiprazole (55%) > miconazole (52%). Miconazole strongly inhibited CYP2J2-mediated ebastine hydroxylation ($IC_{50}$=11.2 ${\mu}M$) and terfenadine hydroxylation ($IC_{50}$=2.2 ${\mu}M$), and terfenadine also inhibited CYP2J2-mediated ebastine hydroxylation ($IC_{50}$=13.6 ${\mu}M$) in a dose dependent manner. The present data suggest that these drugs are potential candidates for further evaluation for their anti-cancer activities.

Comparison of the Bupropion versus Aripiprazole Adjunctive Therapy for the Treatment of Female Depression : Post-Hoc Analyses from a Randomized Prospective Open-Label Multi-Center Study (여성 우울증 환자에서 Aripiprazole과 Bupropion 부가요법의 우울증상 및 안전성에 대한 효과 비교 : 사후분석연구)

  • Keum, Mu-sung;Cheon, Eun-Jin;Lee, Kwang-Hun;Koo, Bon-Hoon;Lee, Young-Ji;Park, Young-Woo;Lee, Jong-hun;Lee, Seung-Jae;Sung, Hyung-Mo
    • Mood & Emotion
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.140-151
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives : The purpose of this study was to examine effects of adjunctive aripiprazole versus bupropion, on depressive symptoms of female depression. Methods : Sixty six female patients with major depressive disorders were enrolled from a six-week, randomized prospective open-label multi-center study. Participants were randomized to receive aripiprazole (2.5-10 mg/day) or bupropion (150-300 mg/day). Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D17), Iowa Fatigue Scale, Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale, Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) were obtained at baseline and after one, two, four, and six weeks. Changes on individual items of HAM-D17 were assessed as well as on composite scales (anxiety, insomnia and drive), and on four core subscales that capture core depression symptoms. Results : Overall, both treatments improved depressive symptoms, without causing serious adverse events. There were significant differences in the HAM-D17 total score (p=0.046) and CGI-S (p=0.004), between aripiprazole and bupropion augmentation, favoring aripiprazole over bupropion. Aripiprazole revealed significantly greater effect size in depressed mood (p=0.006), retardation (p=0.005), anxiety psychic (p=0.032), and general somatic symptom (p=0.01). Conclusion : While both treatments were effective, results of this study suggested that aripiprazole may be preferable, in treating general and core symptoms of female depression.