• KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
• /
• v.4 no.8
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 2015

In journal manuscript submission and review systems, authors can submit their manuscript at any time and editorial members are struggling to find proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts and assign them to such reviewers. In order to solve this problem, we propose a greedy algorithm and a genetic algorithm to recommend proper reviewers for the submitted manuscripts. The proposed algorithms evaluate reviewers' speciality for the submitted manuscripts by using the submitted manuscripts' keywords and the reviewers expertises. In addition to that, they take the fairness among the reviewers' speciality and the review frequency for consideration. To verify the proposed algorithms, we apply them to the JIPS manuscript submission and review system that the Korea Information Processing Society has operated, and present the results in this paper. By performing the performance evaluation of the proposed algorithms, we finally show that the genetic algorithm outperforms the greedy algorithm in terms of the recommended reviewers' fitness.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.139-157
• /
• 2022

Finding and selecting proper reviewers is a burden on the publisher of the journal. In order to solve this problem, the online submission system started to recommend appropriate reviewers automatically. It includes a variety of new features, from recommending authors in the references of submitted papers as reviewers to finding similar papers by searching the citation index and suggesting reviewer candidates extensively. This study investigated how the online submission system provides functions such as recommendation of reviewers. As a result of examining major online submission systems, ScholarOne and Editorial Manager were recommending reviewer candidates by commercial citation index and review history platform. On the other hand, JAMS, a domestic online submission system, did not have any advanced functions such as recommendation of candidates for reviewers. Sooner or later, in Korea, it seems that more efforts should be made to improve the function of online submission system, such as recommending suitable reviewers for papers.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.198
• /
• pp.66-67
• /
• 2006

건축가 아라타 이소자키(Arata Isozaki)는 우리에게도 낯설지 않다. 세계 곳곳에서 수많은 작품들을 진행했을 뿐만 아니라 우리나라에 서도 백남준미술관 건립을 위한 건축설계 아이디어 국제 공모전의 심사위원, 행정도시 국제 공모전의 심사위원을 맡았기 때문이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.1684-1689
• /
• 2006

본 논문에서는 진급추천 문제를 과학적이고 체계적으로 시행하기 위한 방안으로 정량적인 요소들과 불확실하고 모호한 정성적인 요소들을 고려하여 최적의 진급 대상자를 선정하는 다기준 순위결정 모델이 제시되었다. 모델은 평가요소에 대한 중요도 계산과 의사결정자들이 부여한 각 대상자들의 평가치를 통합하여 우선순위를 결정하는 방법을 제공한다. 진급추천 심사는 공정성, 객관성, 투명성의 확보를 통해 신뢰성 있는 심사 결과를 제시할 수 있어야 하며, 이를 위해 본 논문에서는 (가) 인사 관련 전문가들이 평가요소를 결정 (나) Internet을 이용하여 전자식 명목집단법으로 평가요소에 대한 중요도 결정 (다) 심사위원들이 진급 대상자별, 평가요소별로 평가 등급을 부여 (라) 심사위원들의 점수를 통합하여 순위를 결정하는 절차를 제시하였다. 평가등급의 부여는 퍼지이론의 소속함수을 응용하여 나타내었으며, Simulation을 통해 적정수의 심사위원 수를 결정하는 방법도 함께 제시되었다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.17 no.6
• /
• pp.201-209
• /
• 2019

Recently various start-up competitions have been held in the government, public and private sectors. There is a need to improve the business model of the majority of preliminary founders and early founders through the start - up contest, while improving the possibility of commercialization. The purpose of this study is to analyze the present status of various start - up contests based on the actual survey results of the major start - up contest operators and major participants in Korea. The main results of this study are as follows: First, in the run - up contest, there is a tendency to break out of the event personality, to prevent the opening of the business model of the entrepreneur in the competition, to reduce the formal procedure considering the input time, Improvement of the use of presentation materials, and the purpose of the contest and precise specification of the object of the recruitment. Secondly, it is necessary to establish a juror and a mentor pool with expertise. It is necessary to establish the judges and the mentor pool with expertise in each field, allocate the region according to the regional composition, entrust the judges with entrepreneurial experience, and introduce the post evaluation system for the judges after the competition. Third, most of the contest winners are manufacturing / technology-based businesses.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.237
• /
• pp.62-64
• /
• 2010

한국토지주택공사가 입찰업체 심사과정을 완전공개 하는 새로운 입찰심사제도를 도입하는 등 입찰 업체선정을 둘러싼 잡음을 제거하기 위해 발 벗고 나섰다. 한국토지주택공사(사장 이지송, 이하 LH)는 건설부조리를 뿌리 뽑고 기술력만으로 경쟁하는 공정한 입찰질서를 확립하기 위하여 "투명한 심사조직, 깨끗한 심사위원, 공정한 심사제도"를 모토로 LH 만의 독자적인 심사제도인 '투명하고 공정한 LH클린심사제도'를 마련 운영키로 했다. 이에 따라 지난 3월 4일부터 6일까지 시행하는 보금자리주택 2차 시범지구(구리갈매, 부천옥길, 시흥은 계) 설계용역 및 아산배방, 인천청라 U-City 구축사업 심사부터 성공적으로 적용했고, 앞으로 시행할 영종자동크린넷 등 모든 턴키심사에 적용한다고 밝혔다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• v.5 no.9 s.25
• /
• pp.6-9
• /
• 1970

• The Science & Technology
• /
• s.474
• /
• pp.70-71
• /
• 2008

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.83 no.5
• /
• pp.1201-1204
• /
• 2022

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.81 no.5
• /
• pp.1019-1022
• /
• 2020