• Title/Summary/Keyword: 스톡홀름 상공 회의소

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Comparative Analysis of Consolidation Clauses in the Leading Arbitration Rules (주요 중재 규칙에서 병합조항의 비교 분석)

  • Lee, Choonwon
    • Journal of Arbitration Studies
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.67-86
    • /
    • 2020
  • In the case of multiple commerce contracts in commerce, as well as multiple contracts related to it, a solution for the merging of arbitration proceedings is necessary in order to ensure uniformity of dispute resolution. Since the arbitration proceedings are based on the parties' agreement, no merging of two or more arbitration proceedings may transpire unless all parties agree. Claims of merging in arbitration proceedings lead to problems such as lack of party autonomy, resulting from lack of consent of the parties to merging, and how to appoint an arbitrator in a multilateral arbitration proceeding. Many of the major arbitration bodies have recognized the significant benefits of the terms of consolidation, and have recently revised the Arbitration Rules to include or extend existing clauses to reflect the needs of the parties. This study introduces the merging provisions of several selected major arbitration rules, such as the ICC, Switzerland, SCC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, ACICA, and UNCITRAL rules, and looks at the main similarities and differences among the rules.