• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.54-61
• /
• 2005

Sixty years have passed since the police system was established in Korea. So far, there have been consistent discussions on independence of police investigational rights. Political powers have mentioned its independence as one of their public commitments and specifically, it has been a big issue in respect to establishment of the current participation government. The issues involved in investigational rights were derived from the regulations as follows: 'Prosecutors shall manage investigation(No. 195. the Criminal Procedure Act) and 'The police shall be guided by prosecutors in respect to investigation'(No. 195. the Criminal Procedure Act). President No Mu-hyun proposed he would take care of the issues involved in investigational rights at an interview. This study speculates investigational right systems of countries that follow continental law system and English law system and more valid investigational right system based on the guaranty of human rights and the principle of power division to find reasonable suggestions on independence issue.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.59-69
• /
• 2021

The Moon Jae-in administration insisted on reforming the prosecution for the reform of power institutions, and also tried to control the power of the prosecution through the establishment of a high-ranking public officials criminal investigation office. Then, what is the direction of the legal prosecution reform? Above all, it is a logic to drastically reduce the power of the prosecution. How to shrink it? First, it is necessary to control or check the power of prosecution and investigation that the prosecution has. Second, the key to the reform of the prosecution is perhaps to separate personnel rights from power. In order to exclude external pressure from the prosecution's personnel rights, there must be no instruction or intervention from the attorney general. To do this, the prosecutor general must go through various personnel evaluations, such as multi-faceted evaluation. Third, the essence of the High-ranking Officials Criminal Investigations Act is to deal with crimes of prosecutors, judges, police, and members of the National Assembly. It is also the core of the institutional mechanism to cover the corruption of one's family members while holding all the right to investigate, prosecution, and warrant claims, and to check the omnipresent prosecutors who have abused their right to investigate for political purposes. Then, what is necessary for the success of the high-ranking officials criminal investigation office? Above all, We think political neutrality is very necessary. The Ministry of Airborne has a very high authority of the Director. This paper intends to examine the functions and roles of the prosecution and high-ranking officials criminal investigation offices to prevent corruption. We analyzed the contents of the prosecution and the public officials criminal investigation office, and examined the limitations and problems, and the measures to control corruption in public offices.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.97-112
• /
• 1998

암호가 법 질서에 위배되는 목적으로 사용되는 것을 막기 위해 선진 각국에서는 여러 가지 암호 정책을 수립하고 있다. 그 중에서 현재 가장 주목을 받고 있는 것이 키 복구( Key Recovery) 개념이다. 이 개념은 정부 수사기관에게 암호 통신에 대해 수사권을 행사할 수 있는 능력을 부여하는 것이다. 또한 수사권 행사 이외의 프라이버시 침해를 보호할 수 있어야 한다. 본 고에서는 현재까지 제안된 복구 방식과 동향 등을 살펴본다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.20 no.6
• /
• pp.271-288
• /
• 2010

In this paper, we study the dysfunctions of cryptography as dual-use goods and national domestic encryption control policies like key recovery system and decryption order. And we examine risks of the breach of the peoples' constitutional rights like the right to privacy in these policies and analyze these policies by applying the principle of the ban on the over-restriction. Finally, we propose the direction and requirements of our national domestic encryption control policy that maintains the balance of peoples' constitutional rights and investigatory powers.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.127-137
• /
• 2019

In this study, I set the allowable range of viewing / copying rights of investigation records on criminal victims and bereaved families in the procedure of investigation. I tried to grasp the contents of the suspect's statement at an early stage and support it in order to cope appropriately Recently, the social consideration of people suffering from crime victims is expanding in fact. The scope of the investigation is set by the lawyer of the suspect in relation to the subordinate statute concerning the investigation and reading of the investigation record. In parallel, it is necessary to apply to the victim's lawyer or bereaved. This is a part that coincides with the purpose of certifying private rights such as browsing of litigation records to the victim and ultimately has a purpose related to the allowable range. Although it is the right to receive the investigation result at each stage, it is not used properly. Especially when distorted investigation progresses, if the suspect is not prosecuted, the victim may be in a state of regret. The important part can be summarized as the question of whether the investigation of the victim's lawyer is allowed to view and access the criminal records. This section has been reviewed with a focus on the current Act and its functional aspects should be emphasized and revised in accordance with the legal environment. These findings will contribute to ensuring victims' rights in the future. It is also used as an important resource in the legislative process, including the revision of the criminal procedure law.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.191-192
• /
• 2013

형사소송의 목적은 사안의 진상을 밝혀 적정한 형벌권을 실현하는데 있다. 수사기관은 범죄사실을 명백히 밝히기 위하여 아직도 과학적인 수사보다는 자백에 의존하는 경향이 있다는 것은 주지의 사실이다. 수사를 함에 있어 자백에 의존하는 것은 고문 등 강압수사의 위험성이 크다. 이를 방지하기 위하여 형사소송법 제309조는 자백배제법칙을 채택하고 있다. 자백배제법칙을 검토함에 있어서는 무엇보다도 먼저 자백의 임의성에 대한 입증을 살펴보아야 할 것이다. 따라서 본고는 강압수사방지를 위하여 자백의 임의성에 대한 거증책임 문제, 임의성의 기초사실증명 등에 관하여 몇 가지 쟁점을 검토하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.89-90
• /
• 2012

피의자신문시 변호인이 참여할 수 있도록 명문 규정을 둔 2007년 형사소송법 개정은 진일보한 개정이라 할 수 있다. 그러나, 피의자신문시 변호인 참여 제도는 현재까지도 제대로 활성화되지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이 제도를 활성화하기 위해서는 첫째, 피의자에게 국선변호권이 확대되어야 할 것이다. 둘째, '검사의 사법경찰관리에 대한 수사지휘 및 사법경찰관리의 수사준칙에 관한 규정'의 문제점이 개정되어야 할 것이다. 셋째, 수사기관에 대한 교육이 강화되고 변호인에게 수사 일정 등 통지가 제도화 되어야 할 것이다. 이러한 대책을 통해 피의자신문시 변호인 참여 제도가 활겅화되어야 피의자의 인권이 제대로 보장될 것이다.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.14
• /
• pp.485-516
• /
• 2007

Jeju Special Self-Government Province adopted an autonomous police system for the first time since 60 years in Korean police. The purpose of autonomous police system is to offer a police service to be suitable in regional conditions. But Jeju autonomous police system for nearly one year after adoption is criticized to be established on the ground of political reason but not local decentralization. Actually Jeju autonomous police has not a clear cut jurisdiction and operation scope because of the jurisdiction duplication between national and autonomous police. The original task is confined on environment and sightseeing so on given to administration police for local self-government. So criminal investigation authority on general crimes is not to Jeuju autonomous police on account of special judicial police. First, it is the structural rationalization of Jeju autonomous police system. It speaks that Jeju provincial police bureau and police station have to be as national police institution, on the other hand, patrol district station and police box have to be as autonomous police institution. Of course, functional division has to be followed. National police performs managing all the assembly and demonstration by the management law on assembly and demonstration including the suppression against any large scale demonstration and disturbance, also the investigation on serious crimes just as international crimes and broaden area crimes including all the felony. Together national police performs the duty concerned to all the foreign affairs and national securities in along with the investigation on traffic accidents. On the other hand, autonomous police performs the function for citizen's life safety as crime prevention and the enforcement on the violation against police operation law, together the traffic management and the regulation on traffic violations. and the investigation on minor crime as simple violence or petty larceny including the management on local big events. Second, the budgetary of autonomous police is rationalized by the share of budgeting between Korean government and Jeju special self-government province. Third, urgent arrest authority on general crime and the rights of claims for the summary trial on minor crimes are given to autonomous police. Of course, this problem is resolved naturally in case of giving the investigation rights to autonomous police on minor crimes.

• Fire Science and Engineering
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.142-151
• /
• 2009

Nowadays contents of crimes are complicated and diversified because of differentiation and specialization of society. For this reason, special judicial police officer system that each special field officers investigate crimes related to their special fields is introduced to produce high quality private law service. Nevertheless, special judicial police officers who deal with fire crimes show many problems because they have less experiences and ability about investigation than general judicial police officers. Then, purpose of this study is deduction problems by analyzing cases of fire crimes and suggesting improvements which are ways to improve special judcial police officers's who investigate fire crimes efficiencies and professionalisms. Problems about investigation of fire crimes are absence of professional investigation agency, a shortage of professional workforce, absence of professional investigation officers education system. Improvements are creation professional investigation agency, securing experts, developing professional investigation officers education system, construction professional techniques manage system, introduction fire crime cases manage system.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2014

In Korea, all investigations of maritime crime such as murder, robbery, drug trafficking, and illegal fishing that have been committed at sea are under the jurisdiction of maritime police. As maritime crimes tend to have more unique cases, cause damage on a larger scale, and be limited to evidence that is possibly contaminated, compared to non-maritime crimes, the cases demand maritime police investigators with a higher level of expertise. However, there is currently a lack of competent investigators in the maritime police, leading to the training of maritime police investigators in training agencies. so many of maritime investigators goes to land police training agency including Korean Police Investigation Academy. Therefore, in order to improve the capabilities of maritime crime investigation we must first gather information and data in relation to maritime crimes to foster more investigation specialists, and establish specialized training agencies offering a training course more focused on maritime crimes.