• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.46 no.10
• /
• pp.1005-1016
• /
• 2013

The objective of this study was to evaluate spatio-temporal water shortage distribution in the Sapgyo catchment considering both permitted and non-permitted water rights obtained from the total water right survey conducted in 2010. The results showed that the agricultural water accounted for 98% of the total water uses with 83% being the non-permitted agricultural water uses. During the 11-year (2001~2011) simulation period, water shortage was shown only in the upper Gokgyo stream sub-catchment with the highest water stress from April to May in 2009, particularly because of the large demand for rice cultivation associated with low precipitation. As water shortage was not expected to happen when the permitted water rights were not considered, it was concluded that a proper management of non-permitted water rights would be urgent.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.56 no.2
• /
• pp.282-294
• /
• 2023

Efforts are being made internationally to pay attention to the landscape value of modern and contemporary heritage and to pass it on. However, in Korea, the registration of modern and contemporary landscape heritage as registered cultural properties is insignificant. There has also been little discussion on ways to improve the system in this regard. This study sought ways to improve the registration criteria and classification system of the registered cultural property system so that modern and contemporary landscaping heritage could be protected. Currently, the registration criteria for registered cultural properties are not stipulated for each type of heritage, but are stipulated as a single comprehensive standard. Registration criteria should be separately prepared so that the landscape value of the heritage can be reviewed. First, the registration criteria have an important value in understanding the development of landscape culture. Second, well-preserved landscaping reflects or characterizes the times. Lastly, it should be defined as related to the works of major artists or important figures or historical events. The classification system must match the studied building cultural property classification system, and the detailed types of modern and contemporary landscape heritage should be specified. The major classification follows the building cultural property classification system, but parks and green spaces, squares, and gardens, which can be called a single landscape heritage, should be added to the middle classification. Landscaping heritage, such as gardens combined with building heritage, shall be specified in the subcategory based on building use.