• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.11a
• /
• pp.175-176
• /
• 2018

여름철 북극 해빙 면적의 감소 추세로 빙해선박의 북극항로 통항회수가 증가하고 있어 선박의 안전 항해를 위한 기술 개발에 관심이 집중되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 선박해양플랜트연구소에서 개발 중인 KRISO Arctic Safe Routing System(KARS)의 개념과 함께 핵심 모듈 중 하나인 빙저항 추진 성능 DB 개발 과정을 소개하였다. 우선 빙해수조에서 다양한 빙상환경(평탄빙, 유빙, 빙맥 등)에 따른 선박의 빙성능 평가 시험을 수행한 후 대상선박의 기본적인 빙성능을 도출하였고 빙성능 추정 S/W의 해석결과와 비교 검증을 수행하여 다양한 환경 변수를 고려한 빙저항 추진 성능 DB를 생성하였다. 아울러, 생성된 DB의 검증을 위해 2017년 8월 쇄빙연구선 아라온의 빙해역 실선시험 동안 계측된 결과와 비교 분석하여 정확도를 분석하였고 KARS의 개선 사항 및 향후 활용 가능성을 고찰하였다.

• Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.28-33
• /
• 2014

The Korean icebreaking research vessel "Araon" performed four sea trials in the Arctic and Antarctic Seas. The ice properties, such as the ice thickness, floe size, ice strength, and power of the vessel were quite different in these trials. To compare the speeds of ship with the same ice strength and power, the AARC (Arker Arctic Research Center) method is used with a vessel power of 10 MW and an ice strength of 630 Pa in this paper. Based on the analysis results, the speed of the ship was 1.62 knots (0.83 m/s) with a 1.02-m ice thickness and 2.5-km floe size, 5.3 knots (2.73 m/s) with a 1.2-m ice thickness and 1.0-km floe size, and 13.8 knots (7.10 m/s) with a 1.1-m ice thickness and 200-m floe size. The analysis results showed that the ship speed and floe size have an inversely proportional relationship. Two reasonable reasons are given in this paper for the final result. One is an ice breaking phenomenon, and the other is the effect of the ice floe mass. For the breaking phenomenon, the ice breaking force is very small because the ice floe is not breaking but tearing when a ship is passing through a small ice floe. Regarding the effect of the ice floe mass, it is impossible for a ship to push and tear an ice floe if the mass of the ice floe is too large compared to the mass of the ship. The velocity of the ship decreases when the ice floe has a large mass and a large size because the ship has to break the ice floe to move forward.

• Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.27 no.5
• /
• pp.88-92
• /
• 2013

The icebreaking research vessel (IBRV) ARAON had her second ice trial in the Arctic Ocean in the summer season of 2010. During the voyage, the local ice loads acting on the bow of the port side were measured using 14 strain gauges. These measurements were carried out in three icebreaking performance tests. To convert the measured strains into the local ice pressures, a finite element model of the instrumented area was developed. The influence coefficient method (ICM), which uses the influence coefficient from the finite element model, and the direct method, which uses the measured strain, were selected as the conversion methods. As a result, the maximum measured pressure was 1.236MPa, and the average difference between ICM and the direct method was about 5% for an area of $0.2m^2$. The pressure-area relationship of the measurement falls below the range of the existing pressure-area curve, which is due to the low ice strength of melted ice in the summer.

• Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
• /
• v.49 no.6
• /
• pp.478-483
• /
• 2012

The speed performances of ice sea trial on the Arctic(2010 & 2011) area were shown different results depend on the ice floe size. Penetration phenomena of level ice was not happened on medium ice floe and tore up by the impact force because the mass of medium ice floe is similar to the mass of Araon which is Korean ice breaking research vessel and did not shut up by the ice ridge or iceberg. The sea trial on the Amundsen sea was performed at the big floe which is classified by WMO(World Meteorological Organization). Three measurements of ice properties and five results of speed trial were obtained with different ice thicknesses and engine powers. To evaluate speed of level ice trial and model test results at the same ice thickness and engine power, the correction method of HSVA(Hamburg Ship Model Basin) was used. The thickness, snow effect, flexural strength and friction coefficient were corrected to compare the speed of sea trial. The analyzed speed at 1.03m thickness of big floe was 5.85 knots at 10MW power and it's 6.10 knots at 1.0m ice thickness and the same power. It's bigger than the results of level ice because big floe was also slightly tore up by the impact force of vessel based on the observation of recorded video.